Brand H, Michelsen K
Landesinstitut für den Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienst Nordrhein-Westfalen (lögd).
Gesundheitswesen. 2007 Oct;69(10):527-33. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-992163.
For about 20 years public health reporting has increasingly been developed as a resource in health policy counselling. Both with regard to its use as well as its further development it is important to reflect on the possibilities and limits of this resource. A basis for this is provided by theories, models and hypotheses derived from the discussion about scientific policy counselling. In early conceptual reflections on the organisation of health reporting a technocratic use was rejected. This is reflected by the ideas and views about the institutional embedding of health reporting activities. Against the background of diverging opinions about the political dimensions of health reporting activities, reflections were guided by the decisionistic and pragmatic model of the "scientification of politics". Public health reporting must provide the possibility for being used in a flexible way in order to add a pragmatistic component to its decisionistic and strategic uses. For action-oriented, pragmatistic and scientific policy counselling through the health reporting discipline it is important to link "information about politically relevant facts" with the "targeted processing of knowledge geared towards problems in the field of decision-making processes" (expertise).
在大约20年的时间里,公共卫生报告越来越成为健康政策咨询中的一种资源。无论是就其使用还是进一步发展而言,反思这种资源的可能性和局限性都很重要。源于科学政策咨询讨论的理论、模型和假设为此提供了基础。在对健康报告组织的早期概念性思考中,技术官僚式的使用被摒弃。这体现在关于健康报告活动机构嵌入的理念和观点中。在关于健康报告活动政治层面的不同意见背景下,反思以“政治科学化”的决策主义和实用主义模型为指导。公共卫生报告必须提供以灵活方式使用的可能性,以便在其决策主义和战略用途中加入实用主义成分。对于通过健康报告学科进行的面向行动、实用主义和科学性的政策咨询而言,将“与政治相关事实的信息”与“针对决策过程领域问题的有针对性的知识处理”(专业知识)联系起来很重要。