• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆管刷片中恶性肿瘤的细胞学预测因子:60 例多评阅者分析。

Cytologic predictors of malignancy in bile duct brushings: a multi-reviewer analysis of 60 cases.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Mod Pathol. 2017 Sep;30(9):1273-1286. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.51. Epub 2017 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1038/modpathol.2017.51
PMID:28664934
Abstract

Diagnosing malignancy in bile duct brushings is highly challenging. Seven reviewers of variable backgrounds and levels of participation in bile duct brushing sign out blindly reviewed 60 specimens (30 malignant with histologic confirmation and 30 benign (15 stented) with resection or ≥18 months of uneventful follow-up), testing the utility of 14 malignant characteristics. Eleven characteristics were statistically significantly associated with malignancy including 3-dimensional clusters (63% in malignant vs 3% in benign, odds ratio 50, P=0.0003), pleomorphism (62 vs 3, odds ratio 48, P=0.0004), 2-cell population (60% vs 3, odds ratio 44, P=0.0005), chromatin pattern (hypo/hyperchromasia) changes (70% vs 7%, odds ratio 33, P<0.0001), high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio (48 vs 3%, odds ratio 27, P=0.0023), cytoplasmic vacuoles (43 vs 3%, odds ratio 22, P=0.0042), nuclear irregularity (70 vs 10%, odds ratio 21, P<0.0001), cellular discohesion (38 vs 3%, odds ratio 18, P=0.0082), hypercellularity (23% vs 0), nuclear molding (20% vs 0) and prominent nucleoli (21% vs 0). Necrosis and infiltrating inflammation were not helpful in identifying malignancy ('neutrophil cannibalism' was noted in 43% malignant); 21/30 (70%) malignant brushings had ≥3 malignant characteristics, while 23 (77%) benign brushings had none. Of 20 brushings with ≥4 characteristics, 1(5%) proved benign and showed detachment atypia, a close malignant mimicker in brushings. Identification of 3 characteristics maximized the combined sensitivity (70%), specificity (97%) and accuracy (83%), but sensitivity dropped as number of characteristics increased. Identification of 3/11 characteristics (3-dimensional clusters, pleomorphism, high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio, nuclear irregularity, hypercellularity, discohesion, chromatin changes, vacuoles, prominent nucleoli, molding and 2-cell population) improves pathologists' overall performance greatly.

摘要

在胆管刷检中诊断恶性肿瘤极具挑战性。七位具有不同背景和参与程度的审阅者对 60 个标本进行了盲法审阅(30 个恶性标本经组织学证实,30 个良性标本(15 个支架置入)有切除或≥18 个月无不良随访),检测了 14 种恶性特征的效用。11 种特征与恶性肿瘤显著相关,包括三维簇(恶性为 63%,良性为 3%,优势比 50,P=0.0003)、多形性(62 比 3,优势比 48,P=0.0004)、2 细胞群(60%比 3,优势比 44,P=0.0005)、染色质模式(低/高嗜碱性)改变(70%比 7%,优势比 33,P<0.0001)、核浆比升高(48 比 3%,优势比 27,P=0.0023)、细胞质空泡(43 比 3%,优势比 22,P=0.0042)、核不规则性(70 比 10%,优势比 21,P<0.0001)、细胞分离(38 比 3%,优势比 18,P=0.0082)、细胞密集(23%比 0%)、核塑型(20%比 0%)和明显核仁(21%比 0%)。坏死和浸润性炎症对识别恶性肿瘤没有帮助(“中性粒细胞自噬”在 43%的恶性刷片中可见);30 个恶性刷片中 21 个(70%)有≥3 个恶性特征,而 30 个良性刷片中 23 个(77%)没有任何特征。在 20 个有≥4 个特征的刷片中,有 1 个(5%)被证实为良性,表现为刷片中恶性肿瘤的密切类似物-脱落异型性。识别 3 个特征可最大程度地提高联合敏感性(70%)、特异性(97%)和准确性(83%),但随着特征数量的增加,敏感性会下降。识别 3/11 个特征(三维簇、多形性、核浆比升高、核不规则性、细胞密集、分离、染色质改变、空泡、明显核仁、塑型和 2 细胞群)可极大地提高病理学家的整体表现。

相似文献

1
Cytologic predictors of malignancy in bile duct brushings: a multi-reviewer analysis of 60 cases.胆管刷片中恶性肿瘤的细胞学预测因子:60 例多评阅者分析。
Mod Pathol. 2017 Sep;30(9):1273-1286. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.51. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
2
Use of the ThinPrep method in bile duct brushings: analysis of morphologic parameters associated with malignancy and determination of interobserver reliability.液基薄层制片法在胆管刷检中的应用:与恶性肿瘤相关的形态学参数分析及观察者间可靠性的测定
Diagn Cytopathol. 2008 Sep;36(9):651-6. doi: 10.1002/dc.20855.
3
Factors Impacting the Performance Characteristics of Bile Duct Brushings: A Clinico-Cytopathologic Analysis of 253 Patients.影响胆管刷检性能特征的因素:253 例患者的临床-细胞病理分析。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018 Jul;142(7):863-870. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0150-OA. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
4
Cytomorphologic characteristics of next-generation sequencing-positive bile duct brushing specimens.下一代测序阳性胆管刷检标本的细胞形态学特征。
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2020 Nov-Dec;9(6):520-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Endoscopic bile duct brushing of malignant pancreatic biliary strictures: retrospective study with comparison of conventional smear and ThinPrep techniques.恶性胰胆管狭窄的内镜下胆管刷检:传统涂片与液基薄层制片技术比较的回顾性研究
Diagn Cytopathol. 2003 Apr;28(4):196-204. doi: 10.1002/dc.10267.
6
Automated analysis of computerized morphological features of cell clusters associated with malignancy on bile duct brushing whole slide images.胆管刷片全玻片图像中与恶性肿瘤相关的细胞簇的计算机形态特征的自动分析。
Cancer Med. 2023 Mar;12(5):6365-6378. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5365. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
7
Cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma on bile duct brushings in the presence of stent associated changes: A retrospective analysis.存在支架相关改变时胆管刷检腺癌的细胞学诊断:一项回顾性分析
Diagn Cytopathol. 2018 Oct;46(10):826-832. doi: 10.1002/dc.24052. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
8
Effect of single operator cholangioscopy on accuracy of bile duct cytology.单操作员胆管镜检查对胆管细胞学检查准确性的影响。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2020 Dec;48(12):1230-1236. doi: 10.1002/dc.24553. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
9
Bile duct brushing cytology: statistical analysis of proposed diagnostic criteria.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1998 Nov;110(5):635-40. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/110.5.635.
10
Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional smears in detecting carcinoma in bile duct brushings.ThinPrep涂片与传统涂片在胆管刷检中检测癌的比较。
Cancer. 2003 Aug 25;99(4):205-10. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11481.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of a novel bile marker clusterin and a public online prediction platform based on deep learning for cholangiocarcinoma.基于深度学习的新型胆汁标志物簇蛋白和公共在线预测平台用于胆管癌的诊断。
BMC Med. 2023 Aug 8;21(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02990-9.
2
Automated analysis of computerized morphological features of cell clusters associated with malignancy on bile duct brushing whole slide images.胆管刷片全玻片图像中与恶性肿瘤相关的细胞簇的计算机形态特征的自动分析。
Cancer Med. 2023 Mar;12(5):6365-6378. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5365. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
3
Pronounced squamous cell contamination in biliary tract cytology: A diagnostic pitfall.

本文引用的文献

1
Intrapancreatic distal common bile duct carcinoma: Analysis, staging considerations, and comparison with pancreatic ductal and ampullary adenocarcinomas.胰腺内远端胆总管癌:分析、分期考量以及与胰腺导管腺癌和壶腹腺癌的比较
Mod Pathol. 2016 Nov;29(11):1358-1369. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.125. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
2
Diagnostic value of maspin in distinguishing adenocarcinoma from benign biliary epithelium on endoscopic bile duct biopsy.Maspin在内镜下胆管活检中鉴别腺癌与良性胆管上皮的诊断价值。
Hum Pathol. 2015 Nov;46(11):1647-54. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
3
An Optimized Set of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Probes for Detection of Pancreatobiliary Tract Cancer in Cytology Brush Samples.
胆道细胞学中明显的鳞状细胞污染:一个诊断陷阱。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2022 Nov;50(11):E320-E324. doi: 10.1002/dc.25008. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
4
Biliary Strictures and Cholangiocarcinoma - Untangling a Diagnostic Conundrum.胆管狭窄与胆管癌——解开诊断难题
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 30;11:699401. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.699401. eCollection 2021.
5
Benign biliary neoplasms and biliary tumor precursors.良性胆道肿瘤和胆道肿瘤前体。
Pathologica. 2021 Jun;113(3):147-157. doi: 10.32074/1591-951X-251.
用于细胞学刷样本中检测胰胆管癌的一组优化荧光原位杂交探针。
Gastroenterology. 2015 Dec;149(7):1813-1824.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.08.046. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
4
Triple modality testing by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的三联模态检测用于胆管癌的诊断
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar;8(2):56-65. doi: 10.1177/1756283X14564674.
5
Strategies for improving diagnostic accuracy of biliary strictures.提高胆管狭窄诊断准确性的策略。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2015 Apr;123(4):244-52. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21509. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
6
Standardized terminology and nomenclature for pancreatobiliary cytology: the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines.胰腺胆管细胞学的标准化术语和命名法:帕潘尼古拉乌细胞病理学协会指南
Diagn Cytopathol. 2014 Apr;42(4):338-50. doi: 10.1002/dc.23092. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
7
Sensitivity of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography standard cytology: 10-y review of the literature.内镜逆行胰胆管造影标准细胞学检查的敏感性:文献 10 年回顾。
J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):304-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.06.028. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
8
Tissue yield and diagnostic efficacy of fluoroscopic and cholangioscopic techniques to assess indeterminate biliary strictures.评估不确定胆道狭窄的荧光镜和胆道镜技术的组织产量和诊断效果。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Sep;10(9):1042-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.05.025. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
9
IMP3 immunocytochemical staining increases sensitivity in the routine cytologic evaluation of biliary brush specimens.IMP3免疫细胞化学染色提高了胆管刷检标本常规细胞学评估的敏感性。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2012 Apr;40(4):321-6. doi: 10.1002/dc.21571. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
10
Biliary brush cytology in the assessment of biliary strictures at a tertiary center in Iran.伊朗一家三级中心运用胆道刷检细胞学评估胆道狭窄情况
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(10):2793-6.