Anderson Karen E, Stamler David, Davis Mat D, Factor Stewart A, Hauser Robert A, Isojärvi Jouko, Jarskog L Fredrik, Jimenez-Shahed Joohi, Kumar Rajeev, McEvoy Joseph P, Ochudlo Stanislaw, Ondo William G, Fernandez Hubert H
Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;4(8):595-604. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30236-5. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
Tardive dyskinesia results from exposure to dopamine receptor antagonists, such as typical and atypical antipsychotics. If clinically appropriate, clinicians often manage this disorder by lowering the dose of, or discontinuing, the causative drug. There is a significant unmet need for a treatment option that does not disrupt treatment regimens for underlying psychiatric illnesses. We aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fixed doses of deutetrabenazine-a novel vesicular monoamine transporter-2 inhibitor-in patients with tardive dyskinesia.
We did this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial at 75 centres in the USA and Europe. Patients aged 18-80 years with tardive dyskinesia (≥3 months before screening) were randomly assigned centrally (1:1:1:1), via interactive response technology, to receive one of three fixed doses of deutetrabenazine (12 mg/day, 24 mg/day, or 36 mg/day) or matching placebo. Randomisation was stratified by baseline use of dopamine receptor antagonists. Patients were started on oral deutetrabenazine 12 mg/day, and this dose was increased through week 4 until the randomised dose was achieved, then maintained over 8 weeks. During the treatment period, patients, investigators, their site personnel, and sponsor were masked to group assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) score from baseline to week 12 in patients with at least one post-baseline rating. The primary efficacy analysis was done in the modified intention-to-treat population (baseline AIMS score ≥6 and at least one post-baseline rating). The safety analysis was done in patients who received any study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02291861.
Between Oct 29, 2014, and Aug 19, 2016, we randomly assigned 298 patients to receive at least one dose of placebo (n=74), deutetrabenazine 12 mg/day (n=75), 24 mg/day (n=74), or 36 mg/day (n=75); 222 patients comprised the modified intention-to-treat population and 293 patients comprised the safety population. From baseline to week 12, the least-squares mean AIMS score improved by -3·3 points (SE 0·42) in the deutetrabenazine 36 mg/day group, -3·2 points (0·45) in the 24 mg/day group, and -2·1 points (0·42) in the 12 mg/day group, with a treatment difference of -1·9 points (SE 0·58, 95% CI -3·09 to -0·79; p=0·001), -1·8 points (0·60, -3·00 to -0·63; p=0·003), and -0·7 points (0·57, -1·84 to 0·42; p=0·217), respectively, versus -1·4 points (0·41) in the placebo group. The rate of adverse events was similar between patients in the deutetrabenazine 36 mg/day group (n=38/74 [51%]), 24 mg/day group (n=32/73 [44%]), and 12 mg/day group (n=36/74 [49%]), and those in the placebo group (n=34/72 [47%]). Serious adverse events were reported in four (5%) patients given deutetrabenazine 36 mg/day, six (8%) patients given 24 mg/day, and two (3%) patients given 12 mg/day, compared with four (6%) patients given placebo. Two (1%) patients in the safety population died, one each in the deutetrabenazine 24 mg/day and 36 mg/day groups; neither death was deemed related to study drug by the investigator or sponsor.
Deutetrabenazine 24 mg/day and 36 mg/day provided a significant reduction in tardive dyskinesia, with favourable safety and tolerability. These findings suggest that dosing regimens could be individualised and tailored for patients on the basis of dyskinesia control and tolerability.
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries.
迟发性运动障碍由接触多巴胺受体拮抗剂引起,如典型和非典型抗精神病药物。在临床合适的情况下,临床医生通常通过降低致病药物的剂量或停药来治疗这种疾病。对于一种不干扰潜在精神疾病治疗方案的治疗选择,存在着巨大的未满足需求。我们旨在评估固定剂量的氘代丁苯那嗪(一种新型囊泡单胺转运体2抑制剂)治疗迟发性运动障碍患者的疗效、安全性和耐受性。
我们在美国和欧洲的75个中心进行了这项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的3期试验。年龄在18 - 80岁、患有迟发性运动障碍(筛查前≥3个月)的患者通过交互式响应技术进行集中随机分组(1:1:1:1),以接受三种固定剂量的氘代丁苯那嗪(12毫克/天、24毫克/天或36毫克/天)之一或匹配的安慰剂。随机分组按多巴胺受体拮抗剂的基线使用情况进行分层。患者从口服氘代丁苯那嗪12毫克/天开始,该剂量在第4周前逐渐增加直至达到随机分配的剂量,然后维持8周。在治疗期间,患者、研究者、其所在机构人员和申办者均对分组情况不知情。主要疗效终点是在至少有一次基线后评估的患者中,从基线到第12周异常不自主运动量表(AIMS)评分的变化。主要疗效分析在改良意向性治疗人群(基线AIMS评分≥6且至少有一次基线后评估)中进行。安全性分析在接受任何研究药物的患者中进行。本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT02291861。
在2014年10月29日至2016年8月19日期间,我们随机分配298例患者接受至少一剂安慰剂(n = 74)、氘代丁苯那嗪12毫克/天(n = 75)、24毫克/天(n = 74)或36毫克/天(n = 75);222例患者构成改良意向性治疗人群,293例患者构成安全性人群。从基线到第12周,氘代丁苯那嗪36毫克/天组的最小二乘均值AIMS评分改善了-3.3分(标准误0.42),24毫克/天组改善了-3.2分(0.45),12毫克/天组改善了-2.1分(0.42),与安慰剂组的-1.4分(0.41)相比,治疗差异分别为-1.9分(标准误0.58,95%置信区间-3.09至-0.79;p = 0.001)、-1.8分(0.60,-3.00至-0.63;p = 0.003)和-0.7分(0.57,-1.84至0.42;p = 0.217)。氘代丁苯那嗪36毫克/天组(n = 38/74 [51%])、24毫克/天组(n = 32/73 [44%])、12毫克/天组(n = 36/74 [49%])的患者与安慰剂组(n = 34/72 [47%])的患者不良事件发生率相似。接受36毫克/天氘代丁苯那嗪的患者中有4例(5%)、接受24毫克/天的患者中有6例(8%)、接受12毫克/天的患者中有2例(3%)报告了严重不良事件,而接受安慰剂的患者中有4例(6%)。安全性人群中有2例(1%)患者死亡,分别在氘代丁苯那嗪24毫克/天组和36毫克/天组各1例;研究者或申办者均认为这两例死亡与研究药物无关。
氘代丁苯那嗪24毫克/天和36毫克/天可显著减轻迟发性运动障碍,安全性和耐受性良好。这些发现表明,可根据运动障碍的控制情况和耐受性为患者制定个体化的给药方案。
梯瓦制药工业公司。