Marx Robert, Tanner-Smith Emily E, Davison Colleen M, Ufholz Lee-Anne, Freeman John, Shankar Ravi, Newton Lisa, Brown Robert S, Parpia Alyssa S, Cozma Ioana, Hendrikx Shawn
Department of Human and Organizational Development, Peabody College of Education and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 3;7(7):CD009467. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009467.pub2.
A number of school systems worldwide have proposed and implemented later school start times as a means of avoiding the potentially negative impacts that early morning schedules can have on adolescent students. Even mild sleep deprivation has been associated with significant health and educational concerns: increased risk for accidents and injuries, impaired learning, aggression, memory loss, poor self-esteem, and changes in metabolism. Although researchers have begun to explore the effects of delayed school start time, no one has conducted a rigorous review of evidence to determine whether later school start times support adolescent health, education, and well-being.
We aimed to assess the effects of a later school start time for supporting health, education, and well-being in high school students.Secondary objectives were to explore possible differential effects of later school start times in student subgroups and in different types of schools; to identify implementation practices, contextual factors, and delivery modes associated with positive and negative effects of later start times; and to assess the effects of later school start times on the broader community (high school faculty and staff, neighborhood, and families).
We conducted the main search for this review on 28 October 2014 and updated it on 8 February 2016. We searched CENTRAL as well as 17 key electronic databases (including MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, PsycINFO, and Sociological Abstracts), current editions of relevant journals and organizational websites, trial registries, and Google Scholar.
We included any randomized controlled trials, controlled before-and-after studies, and interrupted time series studies with sufficient data points that pertained to students aged 13 to 19 years and that compared different school start times. Studies that reported either primary outcomes of interest (academic outcomes, amount or quality of sleep, mental health indicators, attendance, or alertness) or secondary outcomes (health behaviors, health and safety indicators, social outcomes, family outcomes, school outcomes, or community outcomes) were eligible.
At least two review authors independently determined inclusion and exclusion decisions through screening titles, abstracts, and full-text reports. Two review authors independently extracted data for all eligible studies. We presented findings through a narrative synthesis across all studies. When two or more study samples provided sufficient information to permit effect size calculations, we conducted random-effects meta-analyses to synthesize effects across studies.
Our search located 17 eligible records reporting on 11 unique studies with 297,994 participants; the studies examined academic outcomes, amount and quality of sleep, mental health indicators, attendance, and student alertness. Overall, the quality of the body of evidence was very low, as we rated most studies as being at high or unclear risk of bias with respect to allocation, attrition, absence of randomization, and the collection of baseline data. Therefore, we cannot be confident about the effects of later school start times.Preliminary evidence from the included studies indicated a potential association between later school start times and academic and psychosocial outcomes, but quality and comparability of these data were low and often precluded quantitative synthesis. Four studies examined the association between later school start times and academic outcomes, reporting mixed results. Six studies examined effects on total amount of sleep and reported significant, positive relationships between later school start times and amount of sleep. One study provided information concerning mental health outcomes, reporting an association between decreased depressive symptoms and later school start times. There were mixed results for the association between later school start times and absenteeism. Three studies reported mixed results concerning the association between later school start times and student alertness. There was limited indication of potential adverse effects on logistics, as the qualitative portions of one study reported less interaction between parents and children, and another reported staffing and scheduling difficulties. Because of the insufficient evidence, we cannot draw firm conclusions concerning adverse effects at this time.It is important to note the limitations of this evidence, especially as randomized controlled trials and high-quality primary studies are difficult to conduct; school systems are often unwilling or unable to allow researchers the necessary control over scheduling and data collection. Moreover, this evidence does not speak to the process of implementing later school starts, as the included studies focused on reporting the effects rather than exploring the process.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review on later school start times suggests several potential benefits for this intervention and points to the need for higher quality primary studies. However, as a result of the limited evidence base, we could not determine the effects of later school start times with any confidence.
全球许多学校系统都已提议并实施推迟上学时间,以此避免清晨课程安排可能对青少年学生产生的潜在负面影响。即使是轻微的睡眠剥夺也与重大的健康和教育问题相关:事故和受伤风险增加、学习能力受损、攻击性增强、记忆力减退、自尊心低落以及新陈代谢变化。尽管研究人员已开始探索推迟上学时间的影响,但尚未有人对证据进行严格审查,以确定推迟上学时间是否有助于青少年的健康、教育和幸福。
我们旨在评估推迟上学时间对高中生健康、教育和幸福的影响。次要目的是探讨推迟上学时间在学生亚组和不同类型学校中可能存在的差异效应;确定与推迟上学时间的正负效应相关的实施做法、背景因素和实施模式;并评估推迟上学时间对更广泛社区(高中教职员工、社区和家庭)的影响。
我们于2014年10月28日进行了本次综述的主要检索,并于2016年2月8日进行了更新。我们检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库以及17个主要电子数据库(包括医学索引数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、教育资源信息中心数据库、心理学文摘数据库和社会学文摘数据库)、相关期刊的当期版本和组织网站、试验注册库以及谷歌学术。
我们纳入了任何随机对照试验、前后对照研究以及中断时间序列研究,这些研究涉及13至19岁的学生,且比较了不同的上学时间。报告了感兴趣的主要结局(学业成绩、睡眠量或质量、心理健康指标、出勤率或警觉性)或次要结局(健康行为、健康和安全指标、社会结局、家庭结局、学校结局或社区结局)的研究均符合要求。
至少两名综述作者通过筛选标题、摘要和全文报告,独立确定纳入和排除标准。两名综述作者独立为所有符合要求的研究提取数据。我们通过对所有研究进行叙述性综合来呈现研究结果。当两个或更多研究样本提供了足够的信息以进行效应量计算时,我们进行随机效应荟萃分析以综合各项研究的效应。
我们的检索找到了17条符合要求的记录,这些记录报告了11项独特的研究,涉及297,994名参与者;这些研究考察了学业成绩、睡眠量和质量、心理健康指标、出勤率和学生警觉性。总体而言,证据的质量非常低,因为我们将大多数研究在分配、失访、缺乏随机化以及基线数据收集方面的偏倚风险评为高或不清楚。因此,我们对推迟上学时间的影响无法确定。纳入研究的初步证据表明,推迟上学时间与学业和心理社会结局之间可能存在关联,但这些数据的质量和可比性较低,且常常无法进行定量综合。四项研究考察了推迟上学时间与学业成绩之间的关联,结果不一。六项研究考察了对总睡眠时间的影响,报告了推迟上学时间与睡眠时间之间存在显著的正相关关系。一项研究提供了关于心理健康结局的信息,报告了抑郁症状减轻与推迟上学时间之间的关联。推迟上学时间与缺勤率之间的关联结果不一。三项研究报告了推迟上学时间与学生警觉性之间的关联结果不一。关于后勤方面潜在不利影响的迹象有限,因为一项研究的定性部分报告称父母与孩子之间的互动减少,另一项研究报告了人员配备和排班困难。由于证据不足,我们目前无法就不利影响得出确凿结论。需要注意这一证据的局限性,尤其是因为随机对照试验和高质量的原始研究难以开展;学校系统通常不愿意或无法让研究人员对课程安排和数据收集进行必要的控制。此外,这一证据并未涉及实施推迟上学时间的过程,因为纳入的研究侧重于报告影响而非探索过程。
这项关于推迟上学时间的系统综述表明了这一干预措施的几个潜在益处,并指出需要开展更高质量的原始研究。然而,由于证据基础有限,我们无法确定推迟上学时间的影响。