• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种DNA提取方法用于通过高通量测序全面评估海洋生物膜中16S rRNA细菌多样性的比较

Comparison of four DNA extraction methods for comprehensive assessment of 16S rRNA bacterial diversity in marine biofilms using high-throughput sequencing.

作者信息

Corcoll Natàlia, Österlund Tobias, Sinclair Lucas, Eiler Alexander, Kristiansson Erik, Backhaus Thomas, Eriksson K Martin

机构信息

Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, SE-405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2017 Aug 1;364(14). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx139.

DOI:10.1093/femsle/fnx139
PMID:28673033
Abstract

High-throughput DNA sequencing technologies are increasingly used for the metagenomic characterisation of microbial biodiversity. However, basic issues, such as the choice of an appropriate DNA extraction method, are still not resolved for non-model microbial communities. This study evaluates four commonly used DNA extraction methods for marine periphyton biofilms in terms of DNA yield, efficiency, purity, integrity and resulting 16S rRNA bacterial diversity. Among the tested methods, the Plant DNAzol® Reagent (PlantDNAzol) and the FastDNA® SPIN Kit for Soil (FastDNA Soil) methods were best suited to extract high quantities of DNA (77-130 μg g wet wt-1). Lower amounts of DNA were obtained (<37 μg g wet wt-1) with the Power Plant® Pro DNA Isolation Kit (PowerPlant) and the Power Biofilm® DNA Isolation Kit (PowerBiofilm) methods, but integrity and purity of the extracted DNA were higher. Results from 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing demonstrate that the choice of a DNA extraction method significantly influences the bacterial community profiles generated. A higher number of bacterial OTUs were detected when DNA was extracted with the PowerBiofilm and the PlantDNAzol methods. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential bias in metagenomic diversity estimates associated with different DNA extraction methods.

摘要

高通量DNA测序技术越来越多地用于微生物多样性的宏基因组学表征。然而,对于非模式微生物群落,诸如选择合适的DNA提取方法等基本问题仍未得到解决。本研究从DNA产量、效率、纯度、完整性以及由此产生的16S rRNA细菌多样性方面,评估了四种常用于海洋附生生物膜的DNA提取方法。在所测试的方法中,植物DNAzol试剂(PlantDNAzol)和土壤快速DNA SPIN试剂盒(FastDNA Soil)方法最适合提取大量DNA(77 - 130μg g湿重-1)。使用植物动力Pro DNA分离试剂盒(PowerPlant)和生物膜动力DNA分离试剂盒(PowerBiofilm)方法获得的DNA量较低(<37μg g湿重-1),但提取的DNA完整性和纯度较高。16S rRNA扩增子测序结果表明,DNA提取方法的选择会显著影响所产生的细菌群落概况。当使用PowerBiofilm和PlantDNAzol方法提取DNA时,检测到的细菌OTU数量更多。总体而言,本研究证明了与不同DNA提取方法相关的宏基因组多样性估计中的潜在偏差。

相似文献

1
Comparison of four DNA extraction methods for comprehensive assessment of 16S rRNA bacterial diversity in marine biofilms using high-throughput sequencing.四种DNA提取方法用于通过高通量测序全面评估海洋生物膜中16S rRNA细菌多样性的比较
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2017 Aug 1;364(14). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx139.
2
Optimization of DNA extraction for advancing coral microbiota investigations.优化 DNA 提取方法以推进珊瑚微生物组研究。
Microbiome. 2017 Feb 8;5(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0229-y.
3
Combined bacterial and fungal targeted amplicon sequencing of respiratory samples: Does the DNA extraction method matter?联合细菌和真菌靶向扩增子测序呼吸道样本:DNA 提取方法重要吗?
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0232215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232215. eCollection 2020.
4
DNA extraction for streamlined metagenomics of diverse environmental samples.用于各种环境样本简化宏基因组学的DNA提取。
Biotechniques. 2017 Jun 1;62(6):290-293. doi: 10.2144/000114559.
5
Evaluation of Methods for the Extraction of Microbial DNA From Vaginal Swabs Used for Microbiome Studies.用于宏基因组研究的阴道拭子中微生物 DNA 提取方法的评估。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019 Jun 6;9:197. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00197. eCollection 2019.
6
The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies.宏基因组学的真相:量化和抵消16S rRNA研究中的偏差
BMC Microbiol. 2015 Mar 21;15:66. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0351-6.
7
Optimizing 16S rRNA gene profile analysis from low biomass nasopharyngeal and induced sputum specimens.优化鼻咽和诱导痰低生物量标本 16S rRNA 基因谱分析。
BMC Microbiol. 2020 May 12;20(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01795-7.
8
Host DNA depletion efficiency of microbiome DNA enrichment methods in infected tissue samples.微生物组 DNA 富集方法在感染组织样本中对宿主 DNA 的去除效率。
J Microbiol Methods. 2020 Mar;170:105856. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105856. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
9
Impact of metagenomic DNA extraction procedures on the identifiable endophytic bacterial diversity in Sorghum bicolor (L. Moench).宏基因组DNA提取程序对双色高粱(L. Moench)中可鉴定内生细菌多样性的影响。
J Microbiol Methods. 2015 May;112:104-17. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.03.012. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
10
"MINES" method for genomic DNA extraction from deep biosphere biofilms.从深层生物圈生物膜中提取基因组 DNA 的“MINES”方法。
J Microbiol Methods. 2019 Dec;167:105730. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2019.105730. Epub 2019 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The interplay between bacterial biofilms, encrustation, and wall shear stress in ureteral stents: a review across scales.输尿管支架中细菌生物膜、结痂与壁面剪应力之间的相互作用:跨尺度综述
Front Urol. 2024 Jan 16;3:1335414. doi: 10.3389/fruro.2023.1335414. eCollection 2023.
2
Proficiency testing and cross-laboratory method comparison to support standardisation of diatom DNA metabarcoding for freshwater biomonitoring.能力验证和跨实验室方法比较,以支持用于淡水生物监测的硅藻DNA宏条形码标准化。
Metabarcoding Metagenom. 2025 Jan 10;3:1-23. doi: 10.3897/mbmg.9.133264.
3
Comparison of Lysis and Amplification Methodologies for Optimal 16S rRNA Gene Profiling for Human and Mouse Microbiome Studies.
用于人类和小鼠微生物组研究的最佳16S rRNA基因分析的裂解和扩增方法比较
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jan 29;26(3):1180. doi: 10.3390/ijms26031180.
4
Quantification of Viruses in Wastewater on a Centrifugal Microfluidic Disc.离心微流控芯片上废水中病毒的定量分析
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 Feb 18;59(6):3088-3097. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c13718. Epub 2025 Feb 2.
5
Impact of storage and extraction methods on peat soil microbiomes.储存和提取方法对泥炭土微生物群落的影响。
PeerJ. 2024 Dec 23;12:e18745. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18745. eCollection 2024.
6
Benchmarking DNA isolation methods for marine metagenomics.海洋宏基因组学中 DNA 提取方法的基准测试。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 13;13(1):22138. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48804-z.
7
Blood Supplementation Enhances Bartonella henselae Growth and Molecular Detection of Bacterial DNA in Liquid Culture.血液补充剂增强巴尔通体 DNA 的液体培养物中汉赛巴尔通体生长和分子检测。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0512622. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.05126-22. Epub 2023 May 25.
8
Sequence-Based Characterization of Microalgal Microbiomes: Impact of DNA Extraction Protocol on Yield and Community Composition.基于序列的微藻微生物群落特征分析:DNA提取方法对产量和群落组成的影响
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Mar 28;11(2):e0340822. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03408-22.
9
Cholesteatoma has an altered microbiota with a higher abundance of species.胆脂瘤具有改变的微生物群,其中某些物种的丰度更高。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022 Oct 3;7(6):2011-2019. doi: 10.1002/lio2.934. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
Developing whole cell standards for the microbiome field.开发微生物组领域的全细胞标准。
Microbiome. 2022 Aug 9;10(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01313-z.