Dumbaugh Mari, Bapolisi Wyvine, van de Weerd Jennie, Zabiti Michel, Mommers Paula, Balaluka Ghislain Bisimwa, Merten Sonja
Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Ecole Régionale de Santé Publique, Université Catholique de Bukavu, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of Congo.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 3;17(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1396-3.
In this protocol we describe a mixed methods study in the province of South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo evaluating the effectiveness of different demand side strategies to increase maternal health service utilization and the practice of birth spacing. Conditional service subsidization, conditional cash transfers and non-monetary incentives aim to encourage women to use maternal health services and practice birth spacing in two different health districts. Our methodology will comparatively evaluate the effectiveness of different approaches against each other and no intervention.
METHODS/DESIGN: This study comprises four main research activities: 1) Formative qualitative research to determine feasibility of planned activities and inform development of the quantitative survey; 2) A community-based, longitudinal survey; 3) A retrospective review of health facility records; 4) Qualitative exploration of intervention acceptability and emergent themes through in-depth interviews with program participants, non-participants, their partners and health providers. Female community health workers are engaged as core members of the research team, working in tandem with female survey teams to identify women in the community who meet eligibility criteria. Female community health workers also act as key informants and community entry points during methods design and qualitative exploration. Main study outcomes are completion of antenatal care, institutional delivery, practice of birth spacing, family planning uptake and intervention acceptability in the communities. Qualitative methods also explore decision making around maternal health service use, fertility preference and perceptions of family planning.
The innovative mixed methods design allows quantitative data to inform the relationships and phenomena to be explored in qualitative collection. In turn, qualitative findings will be triangulated with quantitative findings. Inspired by the principles of grounded theory, qualitative analysis will begin while data collection is ongoing. This "conversation" between quantitative and qualitative data will result in a more holistic, context-specific exploration and understanding of research topics, including the mechanisms through which the interventions are or are not effective. In addition, engagement of female community health workers as core members of the research team roots research methods in the realities of the community and provides teams with key informants who are simultaneously implicated in the health system, community and target population.
在本方案中,我们描述了在刚果民主共和国南基伍省开展的一项混合方法研究,该研究评估了不同需求侧策略对提高孕产妇保健服务利用率和生育间隔做法的有效性。有条件服务补贴、有条件现金转移支付和非货币激励措施旨在鼓励妇女在两个不同的卫生区使用孕产妇保健服务并实行生育间隔。我们的方法将相互比较不同方法与无干预措施的有效性。
方法/设计:本研究包括四项主要研究活动:1)形成性定性研究,以确定计划活动的可行性并为定量调查的开展提供信息;2)基于社区的纵向调查;3)对卫生设施记录的回顾性审查;4)通过对项目参与者、非参与者、他们的伴侣和卫生服务提供者进行深入访谈,对干预措施的可接受性和新出现的主题进行定性探索。女性社区卫生工作者作为研究团队的核心成员参与其中,与女性调查团队协同工作,以识别社区中符合资格标准的妇女。女性社区卫生工作者在方法设计和定性探索过程中还充当关键信息提供者和社区切入点。主要研究成果包括社区中产前保健的完成情况、机构分娩、生育间隔做法、计划生育的采用情况以及干预措施的可接受性。定性方法还探讨围绕孕产妇保健服务使用、生育偏好和计划生育观念的决策。
创新的混合方法设计使定量数据能够为定性收集要探索的关系和现象提供信息。反过来,定性研究结果将与定量研究结果相互印证。受扎根理论原则的启发,定性分析将在数据收集过程中开始。定量和定性数据之间的这种“对话”将导致对研究主题进行更全面、针对具体情况的探索和理解,包括干预措施有效或无效的机制。此外,让女性社区卫生工作者作为研究团队的核心成员参与,使研究方法扎根于社区现实,并为团队提供同时涉及卫生系统、社区和目标人群的关键信息提供者。