Department of Rheumatology, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier University, 371, avenue du Doyen-Gaston-Giraud, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Department of Rheumatology, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier University, 371, avenue du Doyen-Gaston-Giraud, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Joint Bone Spine. 2018 Jan;85(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
In this review, we summarise the clinical efficacy and safety of B-cell targeted therapies for primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS).
A systematic literature review was conducted using databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane. Only articles reporting controlled or prospective studies of b-DMARDs modulating B cells in treatment of pSS were selected. The highest-quality studies were selected for meta-analysis. The primary outcome of interest was clinical efficacy at week 24 on fatigue, dryness, Schirmer test, salivary flow rate and the full ESSDAI score including biological domain. For the efficacy criteria used, the difference between rituximab and placebo groups was expressed as mean difference (MD).
Eighteen articles (13 of rituximab, 3 of belimumab, 1 of epratuzumab and 1 of baminercept) were identified for detailed evaluation. 4 controlled randomised trials of rituximab treatment vs. placebo involving 300 patients were included for quantitative analysis. No significant differences were observed between groups in the meta-analysis of mean improvements between baseline and week 24 in fatigue VAS [MD -3,24 95% CI (-30,21 to 23,72)], oral dryness VAS [MD -8,41 95% CI (-35,06 to 18,24)], salivary flow rate [MD 0,04 95% CI (-0,03 to 0,11)] and Schirmer test [MD 0,35 95% CI (-2,13 to 2,82)]. Rituximab was relatively safe compared to placebo.
Our review shows that rituximab is not effective in pSS with the designs and outcomes proposed in the trials. Controlled randomised trials are needed to prove the efficacy of belimumab and epratuzumab in this indication. The randomised controlled trial evaluating baminercept failed to achieve its primary endpoint.
本综述总结了 B 细胞靶向治疗原发性干燥综合征(pSS)的临床疗效和安全性。
通过 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 等数据库进行系统文献检索。仅选择报告了调节 B 细胞的 b-DMARDs 治疗 pSS 的对照或前瞻性研究的文章。选择质量最高的研究进行荟萃分析。主要观察终点为 24 周时疲劳、干燥、Schirmer 试验、唾液流率和包括生物学域的 ESSDAI 总分的临床疗效。对于使用的疗效标准,利妥昔单抗组与安慰剂组的差异表示为均数差(MD)。
确定了 18 篇文章(13 篇关于利妥昔单抗、3 篇关于贝利尤单抗、1 篇关于依帕珠单抗和 1 篇关于巴尼单抗)进行详细评估。纳入了 4 项利妥昔单抗治疗与安慰剂对照的随机对照试验,涉及 300 例患者进行定量分析。在基线至 24 周时疲劳 VAS[MD-3.2495%CI(-30.21 至 23.72)]、口腔干燥 VAS[MD-8.4195%CI(-35.06 至 18.24)]、唾液流率[MD0.0495%CI(-0.03 至 0.11)]和 Schirmer 试验[MD0.3595%CI(-2.13 至 2.82)]的平均改善方面,两组间无显著差异。与安慰剂相比,利妥昔单抗相对安全。
我们的综述表明,根据试验提出的设计和结局,利妥昔单抗对 pSS 无效。需要对照随机临床试验来证明贝利尤单抗和依帕珠单抗在这一适应证中的疗效。评估巴尼单抗的随机对照试验未能达到其主要终点。