Seebacher Frank, Krause Jens
School of Life and Environmental Sciences A08, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
Department of Biology and Ecology of Fishes, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587 Berlin, Germany.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Aug 19;372(1727). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0231.
Many species of animal live in groups, and the group represents the organizational level within which ecological and evolutionary processes occur. Understanding these processes, therefore, relies on knowledge of the mechanisms that permit or constrain group formation. We suggest that physiological capacities and differences in physiology between individuals modify fission-fusion dynamics. Differences between individuals in locomotor capacity and metabolism may lead to fission of groups and sorting of individuals into groups with similar physiological phenotypes. Environmental impacts such as hypoxia can influence maximum group sizes and structure in fish schools by altering access to oxygenated water. The nutritional environment determines group cohesion, and the increase in information collected by the group means that individuals should rely more on social information and form more cohesive groups in uncertain environments. Changing environmental contexts require rapid responses by individuals to maintain group coordination, which are mediated by neuroendocrine signalling systems such as nonapeptides and steroid hormones. Brain processing capacity may constrain social complexity by limiting information processing. Failure to evaluate socially relevant information correctly limits social interactions, which is seen, for example, in autism. Hence, functioning of a group relies to a large extent on the perception and appropriate processing of signals from conspecifics. Many if not all physiological systems are mechanistically linked, and therefore have synergistic effects on social behaviour. A challenge for the future lies in understanding these interactive effects, which will improve understanding of group dynamics, particularly in changing environments.This article is part of the themed issue 'Physiological determinants of social behaviour in animals'.
许多动物物种以群体形式生活,群体代表了生态和进化过程发生的组织层次。因此,理解这些过程依赖于对允许或限制群体形成的机制的了解。我们认为,个体之间的生理能力和生理差异会改变裂变-融合动态。个体在运动能力和新陈代谢方面的差异可能导致群体裂变,并将个体分类到具有相似生理表型的群体中。缺氧等环境影响可以通过改变对含氧水的获取来影响鱼群的最大群体规模和结构。营养环境决定群体凝聚力,群体收集信息的增加意味着个体在不确定环境中应更多地依赖社会信息并形成更具凝聚力的群体。不断变化的环境背景要求个体迅速做出反应以维持群体协调,这由神经内分泌信号系统如九肽和类固醇激素介导。大脑处理能力可能通过限制信息处理来限制社会复杂性。未能正确评估与社会相关的信息会限制社会互动,例如在自闭症中就可以看到这种情况。因此,群体的功能在很大程度上依赖于对来自同种个体信号的感知和适当处理。许多(如果不是全部)生理系统在机制上相互关联,因此对社会行为具有协同作用。未来的一个挑战在于理解这些相互作用的影响,这将增进对群体动态的理解,尤其是在不断变化的环境中。本文是主题为“动物社会行为的生理决定因素”的特刊的一部分。