• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过非随机对照临床试验评估黄金海岸综合护理对慢性病患者或住院高风险患者的效果:一项试点研究方案。

Evaluation of the Gold Coast Integrated Care for patients with chronic disease or high risk of hospitalisation through a non-randomised controlled clinical trial: a pilot study protocol.

作者信息

Scuffham Paul A, Mihala Gabor, Ward Lauren, McMurray Anne, Connor Martin

机构信息

Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia.

Centre for Health Innovation, Griffith University and the Gold Coast Health and Hospital Service, Gold Coast, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 2;7(6):e016776. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016776.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016776
PMID:28674147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5734577/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Chronic diseases are the leading cause of illness, disability and death in Australia. The prevalence and associated health expenditure are projected to soar. There is no 'whole system' approach to healthcare in Australia. To overcome this fragmentation, the Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service (GCHHS) is developing a new model known as Gold Coast Integrated Care (GCIC). To evaluate GCIC a 4-year pilot trial commenced in March 2015. This protocol paper describes the evaluation of GCIC.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A pragmatic non-randomised controlled clinical trial is conducted to test the hypothesis that GCIC will result in improved health and well-being at no additional cost to the healthcare system. Using a mixed methods approach, impact, outcome and process evaluations will be undertaken to assess the effectiveness and acceptability, including the balance of costs between primary and public secondary care sectors, staff and training requirements, clinical service delivery, and trial implementation.Fifteen general practices have agreed to deliver GCIC. One thousand five hundred of their adult patients with treated chronic diseases, high risk of hospitalisation or healthcare utilisation were recruited to the intervention arm. Approximately 3000 patients not associated with the participating general practices were identified as controls using propensity matching which will provide service utilisation and disease data for usual care.Baseline data and follow-up observations are collected annually until the end of 2018. Quantitative analyses will measure patient healthcare costs, utilisation of health services, and health outcomes, and general practice clinical service delivery according to clinical guidelines (number of foot exams, HbA1c tests). Qualitative analyses will focus on patient and staff experiences, satisfaction, engagement and implementation of the programme as planned.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approval was received from the GCHHS and Griffith University. The study is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12616000821493). Findings will be communicated via yearly reports to funding bodies and scientific publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12616000821493; Pre-results.

摘要

引言

慢性病是澳大利亚疾病、残疾和死亡的主要原因。其患病率及相关医疗支出预计将飙升。澳大利亚的医疗保健缺乏“全系统”方法。为克服这种碎片化状况,黄金海岸医院与健康服务机构(GCHHS)正在开发一种名为黄金海岸综合护理(GCIC)的新模式。为评估GCIC,于2015年3月启动了一项为期4年的试点试验。本方案文件描述了对GCIC的评估。

方法与分析

开展一项务实的非随机对照临床试验,以检验GCIC在不增加医疗系统成本的情况下能改善健康和福祉这一假设。采用混合方法,进行影响、结果和过程评估,以评估其有效性和可接受性,包括初级和公立二级医疗部门之间的成本平衡、人员和培训需求、临床服务提供以及试验实施情况。15家普通诊所已同意提供GCIC。招募了1500名患有慢性病、住院风险高或医疗利用率高的成年患者作为干预组。使用倾向匹配法确定了约3000名与参与试验的普通诊所无关的患者作为对照组,这将提供常规护理的服务利用率和疾病数据。每年收集基线数据和随访观察结果,直至2018年底。定量分析将衡量患者的医疗保健成本、医疗服务利用率、健康结果,以及普通诊所根据临床指南提供的临床服务(足部检查次数、糖化血红蛋白检测次数)。定性分析将侧重于患者和工作人员的体验、满意度、参与度以及该项目按计划的实施情况。

伦理与传播

已获得GCHHS和格里菲斯大学的批准。该研究已在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心注册(ACTRN12616000821493)。研究结果将通过年度报告传达给资助机构并发表科学论文。

试验注册号

ACTRN12616000821493;预结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc5a/5734577/c2879368193d/bmjopen-2017-016776f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc5a/5734577/c2879368193d/bmjopen-2017-016776f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc5a/5734577/c2879368193d/bmjopen-2017-016776f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Gold Coast Integrated Care for patients with chronic disease or high risk of hospitalisation through a non-randomised controlled clinical trial: a pilot study protocol.通过非随机对照临床试验评估黄金海岸综合护理对慢性病患者或住院高风险患者的效果:一项试点研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 2;7(6):e016776. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016776.
2
Effectiveness of quality incentive payments in general practice (EQuIP-GP): a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial of an outcomes-based funding model in Australian general practice to improve patient care.质量激励支付在全科医学中的效果(EQuIP-GP):一项基于结局的澳大利亚全科医学中基于资金模型的改善患者护理的群组随机试验研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4336-2.
3
Integrated children's clinic care (ICCC) versus a self-directed care pathway for children with a chronic health condition: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial study protocol.综合儿童诊所护理(ICCC)与慢性健康状况儿童的自主护理路径对比:一项多中心随机对照试验研究方案
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Feb 19;18(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1034-x.
4
Implementing Kanyini GAP, a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in Australia: findings from a qualitative study.在澳大利亚开展务实随机对照试验“卡尼尼差距行动”:一项定性研究的结果
Trials. 2015 Sep 23;16:425. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0956-y.
5
Prioritising Responses Of Nurses To deteriorating patient Observations (PRONTO) protocol: testing the effectiveness of a facilitation intervention in a pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial with an embedded process evaluation and cost analysis.护士对病情恶化患者观察结果的优先响应(PRONTO)方案:一项在实际情况下进行的、采用群组随机试验、嵌入过程评估和成本分析的促进干预措施的有效性测试。
Implement Sci. 2017 Jul 11;12(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0617-5.
6
Implementation of a guideline-based clinical pathway of care to improve health outcomes following whiplash injury (Whiplash ImPaCT): protocol of a randomised, controlled trial.基于指南的临床路径护理实施以改善挥鞭样损伤(Whiplash ImPaCT)后的健康结局:一项随机对照试验方案。
J Physiother. 2016 Apr;62(2):111. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
7
The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) approach to low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.早期恐惧减轻运动(FREE)治疗腰痛方法:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 17;18(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2225-8.
8
Clinical and healthcare improvement through My Health Record usage and education in general practice (CHIME-GP): a study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial.通过在全科医疗中使用 My Health Record 并进行教育来改善临床和医疗服务(CHIME-GP):一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Aug 28;22(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05438-8.
9
Evaluating the effectiveness of a healthy lifestyle clinician in addressing the chronic disease risk behaviours of community mental health clients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估健康生活方式临床医生对社区心理健康服务对象慢性病风险行为的干预效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jun 15;18(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2017-1.
10
At-risk registers integrated into primary care to stop asthma crises in the UK (ARRISA-UK): study protocol for a pragmatic, cluster randomised trial with nested health economic and process evaluations.英国将风险登记册纳入初级保健以预防哮喘危机(ARRISA-UK):一项实用的整群随机试验的研究方案,包含嵌套式卫生经济和过程评估
Trials. 2018 Aug 29;19(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2816-z.

引用本文的文献

1
The Cost Consequences of the Gold Coast Integrated Care Programme.黄金海岸综合护理计划的成本影响
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Sep 15;21(3):9. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5542. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
2
The Gold Coast Integrated Care Programme: The Perspectives of Patients, Carers, General Practitioners and Healthcare Staff.黄金海岸综合护理计划:患者、护理人员、全科医生及医护人员的观点
Int J Integr Care. 2021 May 7;21(2):18. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5550.
3
A risk stratification tool for hospitalisation in Australia using primary care data.基于初级保健数据的澳大利亚住院风险分层工具。

本文引用的文献

1
Impact Evaluation of a System-Wide Chronic Disease Management Program on Health Service Utilisation: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.一项全系统慢性病管理项目对卫生服务利用影响的评估:一项倾向匹配队列研究
PLoS Med. 2016 Jun 7;13(6):e1002035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002035. eCollection 2016 Jun.
2
Attributes common to programs that successfully treat high-need, high-cost individuals.成功治疗高需求、高成本个体的项目所共有的属性。
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Nov 1;21(11):e597-600.
3
Systematic review of integrated models of health care delivered at the primary-secondary interface: how effective is it and what determines effectiveness?
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 21;9(1):5011. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41383-y.
对在初级医疗与二级医疗衔接界面提供的综合医疗模式的系统评价:其效果如何以及哪些因素决定效果?
Aust J Prim Health. 2015;21(4):391-408. doi: 10.1071/PY14172.
4
Successful linking of patient records between hospital services and general practice to facilitate integrated care in a hospital and health service in south-east Queensland.成功连接医院服务与全科医疗之间的患者记录,以促进昆士兰州东南部一家医院及医疗服务机构的综合医疗服务。
Aust Health Rev. 2016 Feb;40(1):78-81. doi: 10.1071/AH15048.
5
Measuring patient satisfaction with health care treatment using the Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction measure delivered superior and robust satisfaction estimates.使用简短患者满意度评估量表来衡量患者对医疗护理的满意度,可以得到更高质量和更稳健的满意度评估结果。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 May;67(5):527-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.010.
6
Quality of life instruments for economic evaluations in health and social care for older people: a systematic review.用于老年人健康和社会护理经济评估的生活质量工具:系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Feb;102:83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.050. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
7
Evaluation of complex integrated care programmes: the approach in North West London.复杂综合护理计划的评估: 西北伦敦的方法。
Int J Integr Care. 2013 Mar 8;13:e006. doi: 10.5334/ijic.974. Print 2013 Jan-Mar.
8
Population norms for the AQoL derived from the 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing.基于 2007 年澳大利亚全国精神健康和福利调查得出的 AQoL 人群常模。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2013 Feb;37(1):7-16. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12004.
9
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials.SPIRIT 2013 解释和说明:临床试验方案指南。
BMJ. 2013 Jan 8;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.
10
Measuring and valuing quality of life for public health research: application of the ICECAP-O capability index in the Australian general population.测量和评估公共卫生研究中的生活质量:澳大利亚普通人群中 ICECAP-O 能力指数的应用。
Int J Public Health. 2013 Jun;58(3):367-76. doi: 10.1007/s00038-012-0407-4. Epub 2012 Sep 8.