• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用最少的数据估算学校封釉计划的成本。

Estimating the cost of school sealant programs with minimal data.

机构信息

Division of Oral Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Barney Barnett School of Business and Free Enterprise, Florida Southern College, Lakeland, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Public Health Dent. 2018 Dec;78(1):17-24. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12224. Epub 2017 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1111/jphd.12224
PMID:28675452
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7978484/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Develop methodology to estimate the annual cost of resources used by school sealant programs (SSPs) and demonstrate its use.

METHODS

We used existing literature and expert opinion to identify SSP cost components and the most appropriate units for their measurement (e.g., per operator) and collection frequency (e.g., per day). For equipment and reusable instruments, costs were sufficiently homogenous across SSPs that we could provide default per unit cost estimates (2016 US$) that SSPs can use in lieu of collecting their own data. We also provide default costs for supply items such that SSPs can estimate total supply costs with program-specific information on sealant material used, as well as number of: sealant stations, operators, service delivery days, children screened/sealed, and number of teeth sealed. For the remaining three categories (labor, mileage, and administrative), costs varied substantially by SSP and required us to develop and pilot collection logs for program-specific data.

RESULTS

The annual cost per sealant station ranged from $584 to $797 depending on program characteristics. For a hypothetical SSP that staffed each of two stations with two operators (hygienist and assistant) compensated at the national rate, hourly labor costs would equal $77.97. Assuming this SSP used disposable instruments, light-cured sealants and delivered sealants (3 per child) to 60 percent of the 3,390 children screened over 100 service days, infection control/supply costs per child would equal $5.30.

CONCLUSION

This methodology allows SSPs to estimate costs with minimal data collection and time.

摘要

目的

开发一种估算学校封釉计划(SSP)所用资源年度成本的方法并展示其应用。

方法

我们利用现有文献和专家意见,确定 SSP 成本构成及最适合其测量的单位(例如,每个操作人员)和采集频率(例如,每天)。对于设备和可重复使用的器械,SSP 之间的成本具有足够的同质性,我们可以提供默认的单位成本估算(2016 年美元),供 SSP 替代自己收集数据时使用。我们还提供了供应物品的默认成本,以便 SSP 可以根据所用封釉材料、封釉站数量、操作人员数量、服务提供天数、筛查/封釉儿童数量以及封釉牙齿数量等特定于计划的信息来估算总供应成本。对于其余的三个类别(劳动力、里程和行政),成本因 SSP 而异,我们需要开发并试用特定于计划的数据采集日志。

结果

根据计划特点,每个封釉站的年度成本在 584 美元至 797 美元之间。对于一个假设的 SSP,假设其每个站配备两名操作人员(卫生员和助手),按照国家费率支付工资,每小时的劳动力成本将等于 77.97 美元。假设该 SSP 使用一次性器械、光固化封釉剂,并为 100 个服务日中筛查的 3390 名儿童中的 60%提供封釉剂(每名儿童 3 个),则每个儿童的感染控制/供应成本将等于 5.30 美元。

结论

这种方法允许 SSP 以最小的数据收集和时间来估算成本。

相似文献

1
Estimating the cost of school sealant programs with minimal data.用最少的数据估算学校封釉计划的成本。
J Public Health Dent. 2018 Dec;78(1):17-24. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12224. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
2
Evaluation of School-Based Dental Sealant Programs: An Updated Community Guide Systematic Economic Review.基于学校的窝沟封闭项目评估:《社区指南》最新系统经济综述
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Mar;52(3):407-415. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
3
Impact of school sealant programs on oral health among youth and identification of potential barriers to implementation.学校密封剂计划对青少年口腔健康的影响及实施潜在障碍的识别。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2022 Oct;153(10):970-978.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2022.05.011. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
4
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.用于预防儿童和青少年恒牙龋齿的窝沟封闭剂与氟化物涂剂对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 4;11(11):CD003067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub5.
5
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.窝沟封闭剂与氟化物漆预防儿童和青少年恒牙龋齿的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 18;2016(1):CD003067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub4.
6
Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in permanent teeth.用于预防恒牙龋齿的窝沟封闭剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):CD001830. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001830.pub5.
7
Impact of increasing Medicaid dental reimbursement and implementing school sealant programs on sealant prevalence.提高医疗补助计划牙科报销额度及实施学校窝沟封闭项目对窝沟封闭普及率的影响
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007 Mar-Apr;13(2):202-6. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200703000-00019.
8
Building community support for a school dental sealant program.为学校牙齿防龋剂项目建立社区支持。
J Dent Hyg. 2001 Fall;75(4):305-9.
9
Sealants for preventing dental caries in primary teeth.窝沟封闭剂预防儿童乳牙龋齿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 11;2(2):CD012981. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012981.pub2.
10
The cost of sealant application in a state dental disease prevention program.某州牙齿疾病预防项目中窝沟封闭剂的应用成本。
J Public Health Dent. 1983 Summer;43(3):249-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1983.tb01916.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening for High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Reveals HPV52 and HPV58 among Pediatric and Adult Patient Saliva Samples.高危型人乳头瘤病毒筛查在儿童和成人患者唾液样本中发现了HPV52和HPV58。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Feb 29;12(3):56. doi: 10.3390/dj12030056.
2
Safety and effectiveness of an innosvative SS-suction device to control moisture in dental procedures.一种用于控制牙科手术中湿度的创新型SS抽吸装置的安全性和有效性。
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 8;9(7):e18129. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18129. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
An Economic Evaluation of a Comprehensive School-Based Caries Prevention Program.一项基于学校的综合性龋齿预防项目的经济评估。
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2019 Oct;4(4):378-387. doi: 10.1177/2380084419837587. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
4
Economic Evaluations of School Sealant Programs and the Consent Conundrum.学校窝沟封闭项目的经济评估与同意难题
J Dent Res. 2019 Feb;98(2):145-147. doi: 10.1177/0022034518806838. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of School-Based Dental Sealant Programs: An Updated Community Guide Systematic Economic Review.基于学校的窝沟封闭项目评估:《社区指南》最新系统经济综述
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Mar;52(3):407-415. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
2
Vital Signs: Dental Sealant Use and Untreated Tooth Decay Among U.S. School-Aged Children.生命体征:美国学龄儿童的牙面窝沟封闭使用情况和未经治疗的龋齿。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Oct 21;65(41):1141-1145. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6541e1.
3
Calculating averted caries attributable to school-based sealant programs with a minimal data set.利用最少数据集计算归因于学校窝沟封闭项目的龋齿预防情况。
J Public Health Dent. 2014 Summer;74(3):202-9. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12047. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
4
Sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth.用于预防恒牙龋齿的窝沟封闭剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28(3):CD001830. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001830.pub4.
5
Preventing dental caries through school-based sealant programs: updated recommendations and reviews of evidence.通过学校窝沟封闭项目预防龋齿:更新的建议和证据回顾。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Nov;140(11):1356-65. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0070.
6
The effectiveness of sealants in managing caries lesions.窝沟封闭剂在处理龋损方面的有效性。
J Dent Res. 2008 Feb;87(2):169-74. doi: 10.1177/154405910808700211.
7
Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2004.口腔健康状况趋势:美国,1988 - 1994年及1999 - 2004年
Vital Health Stat 11. 2007 Apr(248):1-92.
8
Guidelines for infection control in dental health-care settings--2003.牙科保健机构感染控制指南——2003年版
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2003 Dec 19;52(RR-17):1-61.
9
Updated comparison of the caries susceptibility of various morphological types of permanent teeth.恒牙不同形态类型龋齿易感性的最新比较。
J Public Health Dent. 2003 Summer;63(3):174-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2003.tb03496.x.
10
Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine.健康与医学成本效益小组的建议
JAMA. 1996 Oct 16;276(15):1253-8.