Samp Jennifer C, Joo Min J, Schumock Glen T, Calip Gregory S, Pickard A Simon, Lee Todd A
1 University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Nov;51(11):945-953. doi: 10.1177/1060028017719716. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
The recent approval of several fixed-dose combination long-acting β-agonist (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) products has increased the use of dual bronchodilators in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Understanding the comparative safety of this combination is important for informing treatment decisions.
To compare the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular (CCV) events associated with LABA/LAMA compared with a combination of LABA and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS).
This was a retrospective, observational cohort study using health insurance claims data to identify COPD patients initiating LABA/LAMA or LABA/ICS. CCV outcomes included hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis for acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, cardiac dysrhythmia, stroke, or transient ischemic attack. Patients were followed until they experienced an event, discontinued treatment, initiated medication from the opposite cohort, or lost enrollment. Patients were matched 1:4 on propensity scores, and time to event was compared using Cox proportional hazards models.
After matching, there were 3842 patients in the LABA/LAMA cohort and 15 225 in the LABA/ICS cohort. Cardiovascular events in the LABA/LAMA cohort were lower than in the LABA/ICS: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.794; 95% CI = 0.623-0.997. No significant difference in the risk of cerebrovascular events (HR = 1.166; 95% CI = 0.653-1.959) was observed.
Despite concerns about the CCV effects of LAMA and LABA monotherapy, the LABA/LAMA combination had similar or lower risk of these events in comparison to LABA/ICS. Further studies are recommended to confirm these findings.
近期多种固定剂量复方长效β受体激动剂(LABA)和长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)产品的获批,增加了双支气管扩张剂在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)治疗中的使用。了解这种联合用药的相对安全性对于指导治疗决策很重要。
比较LABA/LAMA与LABA和吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)联合用药相比,发生心血管和脑血管(CCV)事件的风险。
这是一项回顾性观察队列研究,利用医疗保险理赔数据识别开始使用LABA/LAMA或LABA/ICS的COPD患者。CCV结局包括以急性冠状动脉综合征、心力衰竭、心律失常、中风或短暂性脑缺血发作为主要诊断的住院治疗。对患者进行随访,直至他们发生事件、停止治疗、开始使用另一队列的药物或失访。根据倾向得分将患者按1:4进行匹配,并使用Cox比例风险模型比较事件发生时间。
匹配后,LABA/LAMA队列中有3842例患者,LABA/ICS队列中有15225例患者。LABA/LAMA队列中的心血管事件低于LABA/ICS队列:风险比(HR)=0.794;95%置信区间(CI)=0.623-0.997。未观察到脑血管事件风险有显著差异(HR=1.166;95%CI=0.653-1.959)。
尽管有人担心LAMA和LABA单药治疗对CCV的影响,但与LABA/ICS相比,LABA/LAMA联合用药发生这些事件的风险相似或更低。建议进一步研究以证实这些发现。