• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在真实临床实践中,COPD 患者使用两种长效支气管扩张剂与急性冠状动脉综合征风险增加相关吗?

Is the use of two versus one long-acting bronchodilator by patients with COPD associated with a higher risk of acute coronary syndrome in real-world clinical practice?

机构信息

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Otago Medical School - Dunedin Campus, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

Pharmacoepidemiology Research Network, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021 Jan;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000840.

DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000840
PMID:33495233
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7839854/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular comorbidity is common among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and there is concern that long-acting bronchodilators (long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and long-acting beta agonists (LABAs)) may further increase the risk of acute coronary events. Information about the impact of treatment intensification on acute coronary syndrome (ACS) risk in real-world settings is limited. We undertook a nationwide nested case-control study to estimate the risk of ACS in users of both a LAMA and a LABA relative to users of a LAMA.

METHODS

We used routinely collected national health and pharmaceutical dispensing data to establish a cohort of patients aged 45 years who initiated long-acting bronchodilator therapy for COPD between 1 February 2006 and 30 December 2013. Fatal and non-fatal ACS events during follow-up were identified using hospital discharge and mortality records. For each case we used risk set sampling to randomly select up to 10 controls, matched by date of birth, sex, date of cohort entry (first LAMA and/or LABA dispensing), and COPD severity.

RESULTS

From the cohort (n=83 417), we identified 5399 ACS cases during 281 292 person-years of follow-up. Compared with current use of LAMA therapy, current use of LAMA and LABA dual therapy was associated with a higher risk of ACS (OR 1.28 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.44)). The OR in an analysis restricted to fatal cases was 1.46 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.91).

CONCLUSION

In real-world clinical practice, use of two versus one long-acting bronchodilator by people with COPD is associated with a higher risk of ACS.

摘要

背景

心血管合并症在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中很常见,人们担心长效支气管扩张剂(长效抗毒蕈碱药物(LAMA)和长效β激动剂(LABA))可能会进一步增加急性冠脉事件的风险。关于治疗强化对真实环境中急性冠脉综合征(ACS)风险影响的信息有限。我们进行了一项全国性嵌套病例对照研究,以估计 LAMA 和 LABA 联合使用相对于 LAMA 单一使用的 ACS 风险。

方法

我们使用常规收集的国家卫生和药物配药数据,建立了一个年龄在 45 岁以上的队列,这些患者在 2006 年 2 月 1 日至 2013 年 12 月 30 日期间开始接受 COPD 的长效支气管扩张剂治疗。使用医院出院和死亡率记录来确定随访期间的致命和非致命 ACS 事件。对于每个病例,我们使用风险集抽样随机选择最多 10 名对照者,通过出生日期、性别、队列入组日期(首次 LAMA 和/或 LABA 配药)和 COPD 严重程度进行匹配。

结果

从队列中(n=83417),我们在 281292 人年的随访中发现了 5399 例 ACS 病例。与当前使用 LAMA 治疗相比,当前使用 LAMA 和 LABA 双重治疗与 ACS 的风险增加相关(OR 1.28(95%CI 1.13 至 1.44))。在仅限于致命病例的分析中,OR 为 1.46(95%CI 1.12 至 1.91)。

结论

在真实的临床实践中,COPD 患者使用两种而非一种长效支气管扩张剂与 ACS 风险增加相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/332e/7839854/78a230a7c025/bmjresp-2020-000840f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/332e/7839854/78a230a7c025/bmjresp-2020-000840f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/332e/7839854/78a230a7c025/bmjresp-2020-000840f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Is the use of two versus one long-acting bronchodilator by patients with COPD associated with a higher risk of acute coronary syndrome in real-world clinical practice?在真实临床实践中,COPD 患者使用两种长效支气管扩张剂与急性冠状动脉综合征风险增加相关吗?
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021 Jan;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000840.
2
Dual versus single long-acting bronchodilator use could raise acute coronary syndrome risk by over 50%: A population-based nested case-control study.双联长效支气管扩张剂使用比单药使用会使急性冠状动脉综合征风险增加超过 50%:一项基于人群的巢式病例对照研究。
J Intern Med. 2021 Nov;290(5):1028-1038. doi: 10.1111/joim.13348. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
3
Association of Cardiovascular Risk With Inhaled Long-Acting Bronchodilators in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Nested Case-Control Study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入长效支气管扩张剂与心血管风险的相关性:一项巢式病例对照研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Feb 1;178(2):229-238. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.7720.
4
Comparative effectiveness of LABA-ICS versus LAMA as initial treatment in COPD targeted by blood eosinophils: a population-based cohort study.基于人群队列的研究:血嗜酸性粒细胞靶向 COPD 患者中 LABA-ICS 与 LAMA 作为初始治疗的比较效果。
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Nov;6(11):855-862. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30368-0. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
5
Comparative Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Safety of Inhaled Long-Acting Bronchodilators in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入长效支气管扩张剂的心血管和脑血管安全性比较:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Jan;36(1):26-37. doi: 10.1002/phar.1684.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Long-Acting Beta -Agonist Combined with a Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist or Inhaled Corticosteroid in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.长效β受体激动剂联合长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂或吸入性糖皮质激素治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较疗效
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Apr;37(4):447-455. doi: 10.1002/phar.1913.
7
Randomized controlled trials and real-world observational studies in evaluating cardiovascular safety of inhaled bronchodilator therapy in COPD.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)吸入性支气管扩张剂治疗心血管安全性的随机对照试验和真实世界观察性研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Nov 25;11:2885-2895. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S118867. eCollection 2016.
8
Patient-reported outcomes of dual bronchodilator fixed-dose combination versus bronchodilator monotherapy in individuals with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中,双联支气管扩张剂固定剂量复方制剂与支气管扩张剂单药治疗的患者报告结局。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Jun 28;14:1377-1388. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S194856. eCollection 2019.
9
Pharmacological interaction between LABAs and LAMAs in the airways: optimizing synergy.长效β2受体激动剂(LABAs)与长效抗胆碱能药物(LAMAs)在气道中的药理相互作用:优化协同作用。
Eur J Pharmacol. 2015 Aug 15;761:168-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.05.020. Epub 2015 May 14.
10
Patterns of use of long-acting bronchodilators in patients with COPD: A nationwide follow-up study of new users in New Zealand.COPD 患者长效支气管扩张剂的使用模式:新西兰新使用者的全国随访研究。
Respirology. 2018 Jun;23(6):583-592. doi: 10.1111/resp.13235. Epub 2017 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Dual versus single long-acting bronchodilator use could raise acute coronary syndrome risk by over 50%: A population-based nested case-control study.双联长效支气管扩张剂使用比单药使用会使急性冠状动脉综合征风险增加超过 50%:一项基于人群的巢式病例对照研究。
J Intern Med. 2021 Nov;290(5):1028-1038. doi: 10.1111/joim.13348. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacologic Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的药物治疗。美国胸科学会临床实践指南。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 May 1;201(9):e56-e69. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202003-0625ST.
2
High level of capture of coronary intervention and associated acute coronary syndromes in the all New Zealand acute coronary syndrome quality improvement cardiac registry and excellent agreement with national administrative datasets (ANZACS-QI 25).在全新西兰急性冠状动脉综合征质量改进心脏登记处中,冠状动脉介入治疗及相关急性冠状动脉综合征的高捕获率,且与国家行政数据集(ANZACS-QI 25)具有高度一致性。
N Z Med J. 2019 Mar 29;132(1492):19-29.
3
Combined aclidinium bromide and long-acting beta2-agonist for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
溴化阿地氯铵与长效β2受体激动剂联合用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 11;12(12):CD011594. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011594.pub2.
4
Dual combination therapy versus long-acting bronchodilators alone for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review and network meta-analysis.双重联合疗法与长效支气管扩张剂单药治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的疗效比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 3;12(12):CD012620. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012620.pub2.
5
Risk of Severe Cardiovascular Events From Add-On Tiotropium in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.加用噻托溴铵治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的严重心血管事件风险。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Oct;93(10):1462-1473. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.05.030. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
6
Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple versus Dual Therapy in Patients with COPD.COPD 患者每日一次单吸入器三联与双联治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 3;378(18):1671-1680. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1713901. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
7
Association of Cardiovascular Risk With Inhaled Long-Acting Bronchodilators in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Nested Case-Control Study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入长效支气管扩张剂与心血管风险的相关性:一项巢式病例对照研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Feb 1;178(2):229-238. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.7720.
8
Risk of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events in COPD Patients Treated With Long-Acting β-Agonist Combined With a Long-Acting Muscarinic or Inhaled Corticosteroid.长效β受体激动剂联合长效毒蕈碱或吸入性糖皮质激素治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者发生心血管和脑血管事件的风险
Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Nov;51(11):945-953. doi: 10.1177/1060028017719716. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
9
Umeclidinium bromide versus placebo for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).溴化乌美溴铵对比安慰剂用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 20;6(6):CD011897. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011897.pub2.
10
Concurrent use of long-acting bronchodilators in COPD and the risk of adverse cardiovascular events.COPD 中长效支气管扩张剂的联合使用与不良心血管事件风险。
Eur Respir J. 2017 May 23;49(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02245-2016. Print 2017 May.