• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮椎体后凸成形术后球囊扩张过程中微创椎体支架对降低球囊瘪陷效应的作用:一项生物力学研究。

The Role of Minimally Invasive Vertebral Body Stent on Reduction of the Deflation Effect After Kyphoplasty: A Biomechanical Study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic surgery, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Mar 15;43(6):E341-E347. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002317.

DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002317
PMID:28678108
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical investigation using cadaver spines.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to assess the magnitude of the deflation effect after balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) or use of minimally invasive vertebral body stent (MIVBS) in in vitro biomechanical condition.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

BKP is a well-established minimally invasive treatment option for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. However, this technique can lead to a secondary height loss-known as the "deflation effect"-causing intrasegmental kyphosis and an overall alignment failure.

METHODS

The study was conducted on 24 human cadaveric vertebral bodies (T12-L5). After creating a compression fracture model, the fractured vertebral bodies were reduced by BKP (n = 12) or by MIVBS (n = 12) and then augmented with polymethyl methacrylate bone cement. Each step of the procedure was performed under fluoroscopic guidance and the results were analyzed quantitatively. Finally, the strength and stiffness of augmented vertebral bodies were measured by biomechanical tests.

RESULTS

Complete initial reduction of the fractured vertebral body height was achieved by both systems. Secondary loss of reduction after balloon deflation was significantly greater in the BKP group (2.36 ± 0.63 mm vs. 0.34 ± 0.43 mm in the MIVBS group; P < 0.05). Height gain was significantly higher in the MIVBS group (77.68% ± 11.46% vs. 34.87% ± 13.16% in the BKP group; P < 0.05). Increase in the kyphotic angle gain (relative to the preoperative kyphotic angle) was significantly more in the MIVBS group (95.60% ± 6.12% vs. 77.0% ± 4.94% in the BKP group; P < 0.05). Failure load was significantly higher in the MIVBS group (189% ± 16% vs. 146% ± 14%; P < 0.05). However, stiffness was not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The deflation effect after BKP can be significantly decreased with the use of the MIVBS technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

摘要

研究设计

使用尸体脊柱进行生物力学研究。

目的

本研究旨在评估球囊后扩张椎体成形术(BKP)或微创椎体支架(MIVBS)在体外生物力学条件下的膨胀效果。

背景资料概要

BKP 是治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的一种成熟的微创治疗选择。然而,这种技术会导致继发性高度损失,即“膨胀效应”,导致节段性后凸和整体排列失败。

方法

本研究在 24 个人体尸体脊柱(T12-L5)上进行。在创建压缩骨折模型后,通过 BKP(n=12)或 MIVBS(n=12)使骨折椎体复位,然后用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯骨水泥进行增强。每个步骤都在透视引导下进行,结果进行了定量分析。最后,通过生物力学测试测量增强椎体的强度和刚度。

结果

两种系统均能完全实现初始骨折椎体高度的复位。BKP 组的球囊膨胀后,复位的二次损失明显更大(2.36±0.63mm 比 MIVBS 组的 0.34±0.43mm;P<0.05)。MIVBS 组的高度增益明显更高(77.68%±11.46%比 BKP 组的 34.87%±13.16%;P<0.05)。MIVBS 组的后凸角度增益(相对于术前后凸角)增加更为明显(95.60%±6.12%比 BKP 组的 77.0%±4.94%;P<0.05)。MIVBS 组的失效载荷明显更高(189%±16%比 BKP 组的 146%±14%;P<0.05)。然而,两组之间的刚度没有显著差异。

结论

使用 MIVBS 技术可以显著减少 BKP 后的膨胀效应。

证据水平

无。

相似文献

1
The Role of Minimally Invasive Vertebral Body Stent on Reduction of the Deflation Effect After Kyphoplasty: A Biomechanical Study.经皮椎体后凸成形术后球囊扩张过程中微创椎体支架对降低球囊瘪陷效应的作用:一项生物力学研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Mar 15;43(6):E341-E347. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002317.
2
Cement augmentation in a thoracolumbar fracture model: reduction and stability after balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebral body stenting.胸腰椎骨折模型中的骨水泥强化:球囊后凸成形术与椎体支架置入术后的复位与稳定性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Sep 1;39(19):E1147-53. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000470.
3
Height restoration and preservation in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a biomechanical analysis of standard balloon kyphoplasty versus radiofrequency kyphoplasty in a cadaveric model.骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折中的身高恢复与维持:尸体模型中标准球囊后凸成形术与射频后凸成形术的生物力学分析
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Jul;27(5):283-9. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182aab205.
4
Height restoration of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures using different intravertebral reduction devices: a cadaveric study.使用不同椎体内复位装置恢复骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的高度:一项尸体研究
Spine J. 2015 May 1;15(5):1092-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.094. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
5
Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty versus a titanium mesh implant with cement for stabilization of vertebral compression fractures.球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术与钛网加骨水泥植入物治疗椎体压缩性骨折的生物力学比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Sep 1;35(19):1783-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b7cc5d.
6
Vertebral body stenting: a new method for vertebral augmentation versus kyphoplasty.椎体支架置入术:一种新的椎体增强方法与球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术比较。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Jun;19(6):916-23. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1341-x. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
7
Biomechanical evaluation of calcium phosphate-based nanocomposite versus polymethylmethacrylate cement for percutaneous kyphoplasty.磷酸钙基纳米复合材料与聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯骨水泥经皮椎体后凸成形术的生物力学评价。
Spine J. 2019 Nov;19(11):1871-1884. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
8
Height restoration and sustainability using bilateral vertebral augmentation systems for vertebral compression fractures: a cadaveric study.使用双侧椎体强化系统治疗椎体压缩骨折的身高恢复及可持续性:一项尸体研究
Spine J. 2022 Dec;22(12):2072-2081. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.06.011. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
9
Secondary balloon kyphoplasty for new vertebral compression fracture after initial single-level balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.在初次对骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折进行单节段球囊椎体后凸成形术后,针对新出现的椎体压缩骨折进行二次球囊椎体后凸成形术。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Jul;26(7):1842-1851. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4784-x. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
10
Height and volume restoration in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a biomechanical comparison of standard balloon kyphoplasty versus Tektona® in a cadaveric fracture model.骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的高度和体积恢复:尸体骨折模型中标准球囊后凸成形术与Tektona®的生物力学比较
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jan 13;22(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03899-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes of Vertebral Body Stenting for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Focus on Collapse Prevention and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Indication.骨质疏松性椎体骨折椎体支架置入术的临床结果:聚焦于塌陷预防及基于磁共振成像的适应证
Global Spine J. 2025 Aug 20:21925682251370280. doi: 10.1177/21925682251370280.
2
Biomechanical Comparisons between One- and Two-Compartment Devices for Reconstructing Vertebrae by Kyphoplasty.经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗椎体骨折中,单节段与双节段装置重建椎体的生物力学比较。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Aug 5;11(8):795. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11080795.
3
The Effectiveness of Vertebral Height Restoration Based on the Vertebroplasty Procedure Used to Treat Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.
基于椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折的椎体高度恢复效果
Neurospine. 2023 Dec;20(4):1159-1165. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346754.377. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
4
Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes of vertebral body stenting versus percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮椎体后凸成形术与球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的临床和影像学结果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2024 Jan 1;35(1):218-230. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.1356. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
5
A novel device with pedicular anchorage provides better biomechanical properties than balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures.一种具有椎弓根锚固的新型装置在治疗椎体压缩骨折方面比球囊后凸成形术具有更好的生物力学性能。
J Exp Orthop. 2023 Jul 21;10(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00635-7.
6
A 20-Year Review of Biomechanical Experimental Studies on Spine Implants Used for Percutaneous Surgical Repair of Vertebral Compression Fractures.经皮手术治疗椎体压缩性骨折的脊柱植入物生物力学实验研究 20 年回顾。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Sep 21;2022:6015067. doi: 10.1155/2022/6015067. eCollection 2022.
7
Therapeutic Efficacy of Third-Generation Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation System (PVAS) in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures (OVCFs): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.第三代经皮椎体后凸成形术系统(PVAS)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCFs)的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 May 7;2022:9637831. doi: 10.1155/2022/9637831. eCollection 2022.
8
Minimally Invasive Stent Screw-Assisted Internal Fixation Technique Corrects Kyphosis in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures with Severe Collapse: A Pilot "Vertebra Plana" Series.微创支架螺钉辅助内固定技术矫正严重塌陷骨质疏松性椎体骨折后凸畸形:一项“椎体平板”系列初步研究。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022 May;43(5):776-783. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7493. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
9
Is unilateral transverse process-pedicle percutaneous kyphoplasty a better choice for osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures in the old patients?单侧经皮横突-椎弓根椎体后凸成形术是否是老年骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折患者的更佳选择?
BMC Surg. 2021 May 21;21(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01246-8.
10
Is vertebral body stenting in combination with CaP cement superior to kyphoplasty?椎体支架置入联合 CaP 骨水泥与球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术相比是否更优?
Eur Spine J. 2018 Oct;27(10):2602-2608. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5717-7. Epub 2018 Aug 11.