From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (E.T., M. Sinn, M.A., J.W., G.A., G.K.L.), University Heart Center, Department of General and Interventional Cardiology (S. Bohnen, U.K.R., S. Blankenberg, K.M.), and Department for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology (C.E.), University Hospital Eppendorf, Martinistr 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany; Department of Information Technology and Image Processing, University of Applied Sciences, Wedel, Germany (D.S.); Philips Research Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany (C.S.); Philips Healthcare Germany, Hamburg, Germany (B.S.); Department of Radiology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (C.B.H.); and Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M. Saeed).
Radiology. 2017 Oct;285(1):83-91. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162338. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
Purpose To analyze the diagnostic accuracy of native T1 and T2 mapping compared with visual and quantitative assessment of edema on T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) images to differentiate between acute and chronic myocardial infarction. Materials and Methods This study had institutional ethics committee approval. Written informed consent was obtained from 67 consecutive patients (57 years ± 12; 78% men) with a first acute myocardial infarction, who were prospectively enrolled between April 2011 and June 2015. Four serial 1.5-T MR imaging examinations were performed at 8 days ± 5, 7 weeks ± 2, 3 months ± 0.5, and 6 months ± 1.4 after infarction and included T2-weighted, native T1/T2 mapping, and late gadolinium enhancement MR imaging. Complete follow-up data were obtained in 42 patients. Regional native T1/T2 relaxation time, T2-weighted ratio, and extracellular volume were serially measured in infarcted and remote myocardium. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the MR imaging parameters for discriminating between acute and chronic myocardial infarction. Results Native T1 of infarcted myocardium decreased from 1286 msec ± 99 at baseline to 1077 msec ± 50 at 6 months (P < .0001), whereas T2 decreased from 84 msec ± 10 to 58 msec ± 4 (P < .0001). The T2-weighted ratio decreased from 4.1 ± 1.0 to 2.4 ± 0.6 (P < .0001). Of all the MR imaging parameters obtained, native T1 and T2 yielded the best areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) of 0.975 and 0.979, respectively, for differentiating between acute and chronic myocardial infarction. Visual analysis of the presence of edema at standard T2-weighted cardiac MR imaging resulted in an inferior AUC of 0.863 (P < .01). Conclusion Native T1 and T2 of infarcted myocardium are excellent discriminators between acute and chronic myocardial infarction and are superior to all other MR imaging parameters. Online supplemental material is available for this article.
分析心脏磁共振(CMR)T1 及 T2 自然对比mapping 与 T2 加权水肿视觉和定量评估诊断急性和慢性心肌梗死的准确性。
本研究获得机构伦理委员会批准,2011 年 4 月至 2015 年 6 月前瞻性纳入 67 例首次急性心肌梗死患者(57 岁±12;78%为男性),并获得书面知情同意。在梗死后 8 天±5、7 周±2、3 个月±0.5 和 6 个月±1.4 进行 4 次 1.5-T CMR 检查,包括 T2 加权、T1/T2 自然对比 mapping 和钆延迟增强磁共振成像。对 42 例患者获得完整随访数据。在梗死区和正常心肌中连续测量局部 T1/T2 弛豫时间、T2 加权比值和细胞外容积。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析确定 CMR 成像参数诊断急性和慢性心肌梗死的准确性。
梗死心肌的 T1 从基线时的 1286±99msec 降至 6 个月时的 1077±50msec(P<.0001),而 T2 从 84±10msec 降至 58±4msec(P<.0001)。T2 加权比值从 4.1±1.0 降至 2.4±0.6(P<.0001)。在所有获得的 MR 成像参数中,T1 和 T2 的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)最佳,分别为 0.975 和 0.979,用于区分急性和慢性心肌梗死。标准 T2 加权 CMR 图像上水肿的视觉分析得出的 AUC 较差,为 0.863(P<.01)。
梗死心肌的 T1 和 T2 是急性和慢性心肌梗死的良好鉴别指标,优于其他所有 MR 成像参数。本文提供了补充材料。