Holland Amanda E, Byrne Michael E, Bryan A Lawrence, DeVault Travis L, Rhodes Olin E, Beasley James C
Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Aiken, South Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 5;12(7):e0179819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179819. eCollection 2017.
Knowledge of black vulture (Coragyps atratus) and turkey vulture (Cathartes aura) spatial ecology is surprisingly limited despite their vital ecological roles. Fine-scale assessments of space use patterns and resource selection are particularly lacking, although development of tracking technologies has allowed data collection at finer temporal and spatial resolution. Objectives of this study were to conduct the first assessment of monthly home range and core area sizes of resident black and turkey vultures with consideration to sex, as well as elucidate differences in monthly, seasonal, and annual activity patterns based on fine-scale movement data analyses. We collected 2.8-million locations for 9 black and 9 turkey vultures from June 2013 -August 2015 using solar-powered GSM/GPS transmitters. We quantified home ranges and core areas using the dynamic Brownian bridge movement model and evaluated differences as a function of species, sex, and month. Mean monthly home ranges for turkey vultures were ~50% larger than those of black vultures, although mean core area sizes did not differ between species. Turkey vulture home ranges varied little across months, with exception to a notable reduction in space-use in May, which corresponds with timing of chick-rearing activities. Black vulture home ranges and core areas as well as turkey vulture core areas were larger in breeding season months (January-April). Comparison of space use between male and female vultures was only possible for black vultures, and space use was only slightly larger for females during breeding months (February-May). Analysis of activity patterns revealed turkey vultures spend more time in flight and switch motion states (between flight and stationary) more frequently than black vultures across temporal scales. This study reveals substantive variability in space use and activity rates between sympatric black and turkey vultures, providing insights into potential behavioral mechanisms contributing to niche differentiation between these species.
尽管黑兀鹫(Coragyps atratus)和火鸡兀鹫(Cathartes aura)在生态系统中发挥着至关重要的作用,但其空间生态学知识却惊人地有限。尽管追踪技术的发展使得能够以更高的时间和空间分辨率收集数据,但对空间利用模式和资源选择的精细尺度评估尤为缺乏。本研究的目的是首次评估常住黑兀鹫和火鸡兀鹫的月度家域和核心区域大小,并考虑性别因素,同时基于精细尺度的运动数据分析阐明月度、季节和年度活动模式的差异。我们在2013年6月至2015年8月期间,使用太阳能GSM/GPS发射器收集了9只黑兀鹫和9只火鸡兀鹫的280万个位置数据。我们使用动态布朗桥运动模型对家域和核心区域进行了量化,并评估了物种、性别和月份之间的差异。火鸡兀鹫的平均月度家域比黑兀鹫大~50%,尽管不同物种之间的平均核心区域大小没有差异。火鸡兀鹫的家域在各月份之间变化不大,不过在5月份空间利用显著减少,这与育雏活动的时间相对应。黑兀鹫的家域和核心区域以及火鸡兀鹫的核心区域在繁殖季节月份(1月至4月)更大。仅对黑兀鹫进行了雄性和雌性兀鹫空间利用的比较,并且在繁殖月份(2月至5月)雌性的空间利用仅略大于雄性。活动模式分析表明,在各个时间尺度上,火鸡兀鹫在空中飞行的时间更多,并且比黑兀鹫更频繁地切换运动状态(在飞行和静止之间)。这项研究揭示了同域分布的黑兀鹫和火鸡兀鹫在空间利用和活动率方面存在显著差异,为这些物种之间生态位分化的潜在行为机制提供了见解。