Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, UMR 5175 CNRS, Université Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France.
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053077. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
Feeding stations are commonly used to sustain conservation programs of scavengers but their impact on behaviour is still debated. They increase the temporal and spatial predictability of food resources while scavengers have supposedly evolved to search for unpredictable resources. In the Grands Causses (France), a reintroduced population of Griffon vultures Gyps fulvus can find carcasses at three types of sites: 1. "light feeding stations", where farmers can drop carcasses at their farm (spatially predictable), 2. "heavy feeding stations", where carcasses from nearby farms are concentrated (spatially and temporally predictable) and 3. open grasslands, where resources are randomly distributed (unpredictable). The impact of feeding stations on vulture's foraging behaviour was investigated using 28 GPS-tracked vultures. The average home range size was maximal in spring (1272 ± 752 km(2)) and minimal in winter (473 ± 237 km(2)) and was highly variable among individuals. Analyses of home range characteristics and feeding habitat selection via compositional analysis showed that feeding stations were always preferred compared to the rest of the habitat where vultures can find unpredictable resources. Feeding stations were particularly used when resources were scarce (summer) or when flight conditions were poor (winter), limiting long-ranging movements. However, when flight conditions were optimal, home ranges also encompassed large areas of grassland where vultures could find unpredictable resources, suggesting that vultures did not lose their natural ability to forage on unpredictable resources, even when feeding stations were available. However during seasons when food abundance and flight conditions were not limited, vultures seemed to favour light over heavy feeding stations, probably because of the reduced intraspecific competition and a pattern closer to the natural dispersion of resources in the landscape. Light feeding stations are interesting tools for managing food resources, but don't prevent vultures to feed at other places with possibly high risk of intoxication (poison).
投喂站常用于维持食腐动物的保护计划,但它们对行为的影响仍存在争议。投喂站增加了食物资源的时间和空间可预测性,而食腐动物据称已经进化到寻找不可预测的资源。在法国的 Grands Causses,重新引入的大秃鹫 Gyps fulvus 种群可以在三种地点找到尸体:1. “轻投喂站”,农民可以在农场投放尸体(空间上可预测);2. “重投喂站”,附近农场的尸体集中在这里(空间和时间上可预测);3. 开阔的草原,资源随机分布(不可预测)。通过 28 只 GPS 跟踪的秃鹫研究了投喂站对秃鹫觅食行为的影响。平均家域大小在春季最大(1272±752km²),冬季最小(473±237km²),个体之间差异很大。通过成分分析对家域特征和觅食栖息地选择进行分析表明,与秃鹫可以找到不可预测资源的其他栖息地相比,投喂站总是首选。当资源稀缺(夏季)或飞行条件较差(冬季)时,投喂站特别有用,限制了远距离移动。然而,当飞行条件最佳时,家域也包括大片草原,秃鹫可以在那里找到不可预测的资源,这表明即使有投喂站,秃鹫也没有失去寻找不可预测资源的自然觅食能力。然而,在食物丰富和飞行条件不受限制的季节,秃鹫似乎更喜欢轻投喂站而不是重投喂站,这可能是因为竞争减少,而且与景观中资源的自然分散模式更接近。轻投喂站是管理食物资源的有趣工具,但不能防止秃鹫在其他可能中毒风险较高的地方进食(中毒)。