Assem Naida Zanini, Alves Márcio Luiz Ferro, Lopes Alessandra Barreto, Gualberto Erivan Clementino, Garcia Valdir Gouveia, Theodoro Letícia Helena
Universidade do Estado de São Paulo - Unesp, School of Dentistry, Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
Latin American Institute of Dental Research and Education - Ilapeo, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2017 Jul 3;31:e67. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0067.
The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effect of systemic antibiotics in the periodontal treatment of smokers. The selection criteria were as follows: controlled randomized clinical trials; studies published in English; studies with smoker patients diagnosed with chronic periodontitis; patients without systemic diseases; studies that used systemic antibiotic therapy associated with periodontal treatment; studies that presented results for the test and control groups and assessments of clinical periodontal parameters, such as probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), and clinical attachment level (CAL). The differences in average weights were calculated with a confidence interval (CI) of 95% for PD reduction, CAL gain and BOP. The means of the periodontal clinical parameters were compared between the baseline and post-treatment periods between the test groups and the control groups. The heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test (Q (df = 3), α = 5%). A total of 67 articles were found, and after the selection process, three randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. The results indicate that SRP associated with systemic antibiotics promoted additional benefits when compared to SRP alone, with a greater reduction of PD (p = 0.0359, CI = -0.42, -0.01) and a gain of CAL (p = 0.0161, CI = -0.39, -0.04). There was a modest PD reduction (PD, DM -0.21) and a modest CAL gain (CAL, DM -0.22). The results of our meta-analysis reveal the clinical benefits of systemic antibiotics as an adjunct to the non-surgical periodontal treatment of smokers. These clinical improvements, although statistically significant, appeared to be of little clinical relevance.
本研究的目的是进行一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以检验全身用抗生素在吸烟者牙周治疗中的效果。选择标准如下:对照随机临床试验;英文发表的研究;诊断为慢性牙周炎的吸烟者患者的研究;无全身疾病的患者;使用与牙周治疗相关的全身抗生素治疗的研究;给出试验组和对照组结果以及牙周临床参数评估(如探诊深度(PD)、探诊出血(BOP)和临床附着水平(CAL))的研究。计算PD减少、CAL增加和BOP时平均权重的差异,置信区间(CI)为95%。比较试验组和对照组在基线期和治疗后牙周临床参数的均值。使用Cochran Q检验评估异质性(Q(自由度 = 3),α = 5%)。共检索到67篇文章,经过筛选过程,3项随机对照试验纳入荟萃分析。结果表明,与单独的龈上洁治术(SRP)相比,SRP联合全身用抗生素可带来额外益处,PD减少幅度更大(p = 0.0359,CI = -0.42,-0.01),CAL增加(p = 0.0161,CI = -0.39,-0.04)。有适度PD减少(PD,差值均值 -0.21)和适度CAL增加(CAL,差值均值 -0.22)。我们的荟萃分析结果揭示了全身用抗生素作为吸烟者非手术牙周治疗辅助手段的临床益处。这些临床改善虽然具有统计学意义,但似乎临床相关性不大。