Suppr超能文献

背景噪声对嗓音障碍言语清晰度的影响。

The Effect of Background Noise on Intelligibility of Dysphonic Speech.

作者信息

Ishikawa Keiko, Boyce Suzanne, Kelchner Lisa, Powell Maria Golla, Schieve Heidi, de Alarcon Alessandro, Khosla Sid

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, OH.

Department of Otolaryngology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jul 12;60(7):1919-1929. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0012.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of background noise on the intelligibility of dysphonic speech and to examine the relationship between intelligibility in noise and an acoustic measure of dysphonia: cepstral peak prominence (CPP).

METHOD

A study of speech perception was conducted using speech samples from 6 adult speakers with typical voice and 6 adult speakers with dysphonia. Speech samples were presented to 30 listeners with typical hearing in 3 noise conditions: quiet, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)+5, and SNR+0. Intelligibility scores were obtained via orthographic transcription as the percentage of correctly identified words. Speech samples were acoustically analyzed using CPP, and the correlation between the CPP measurements and intelligibility scores was examined.

RESULTS

The intelligibility of both typical and dysphonic speech was reduced as the level of background noise increased. The reduction was significantly greater in dysphonic speech. A strong correlation was noted between CPP and intelligibility score at SNR+0.

CONCLUSIONS

Dysphonic speech is relatively harder to understand in the presence of background noise as compared with typical speech. CPP may be a useful predictor of this intelligibility deficit. Future work is needed to confirm these findings with a larger number of speakers and speech materials with known predictability.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定背景噪声对嗓音障碍患者语音清晰度的影响,并探讨噪声环境下的语音清晰度与嗓音障碍的声学指标:谐波峰值突出度(CPP)之间的关系。

方法

使用6名嗓音正常的成年说话者和6名嗓音障碍成年说话者的语音样本进行语音感知研究。语音样本在3种噪声条件下呈现给30名听力正常的听众:安静环境、信噪比(SNR)+5和SNR+0。通过正字法转录获得清晰度得分,即正确识别单词的百分比。使用CPP对语音样本进行声学分析,并检验CPP测量值与清晰度得分之间的相关性。

结果

随着背景噪声水平的增加,正常语音和嗓音障碍患者语音的清晰度均降低。嗓音障碍患者语音的清晰度下降更为显著。在SNR+0时,CPP与清晰度得分之间存在强相关性。

结论

与正常语音相比,在存在背景噪声的情况下,嗓音障碍患者的语音相对更难理解。CPP可能是这种清晰度缺陷的一个有用预测指标。未来需要开展更多工作,以更大数量的说话者和具有已知可预测性的语音材料来证实这些发现。

相似文献

1
The Effect of Background Noise on Intelligibility of Dysphonic Speech.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jul 12;60(7):1919-1929. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0012.
2
Predicting Intelligibility Deficit in Dysphonic Speech with Cepstral Peak Prominence.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2018 Feb;127(2):69-78. doi: 10.1177/0003489417743518. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
3
The Effects of Dysphonic Voice on Speech Intelligibility in Cantonese-Speaking Adults.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Jan 14;64(1):16-29. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00190. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
4
Perception and Acoustic Studies of Vowel Intelligibility in Dysphonic Speech.
J Voice. 2021 Jul;35(4):659.e11-659.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.12.022. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
5
The Formant Bandwidth as a Measure of Vowel Intelligibility in Dysphonic Speech.
J Voice. 2023 Mar;37(2):173-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.10.012. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
6
Agreement between Transcription- and Rating-Based Intelligibility Measurements for Evaluation of Dysphonic Speech in Noise.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2021 Oct 3;35(10):983-995. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2020.1852602. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
7
8
Validation of Cepstral Acoustic Analysis for Normal and Pathological Voice in the Japanese Language.
J Voice. 2022 Nov;36(6):770-776. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.08.026. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
9
Effect of Dysphonia and Cognitive-Perceptual Listener Strategies on Speech Intelligibility.
J Voice. 2020 Sep;34(5):806.e7-806.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.03.013. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
10
Use of cepstral analysis for differentiating dysphonic from normal voices in children.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jan;116:107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.10.029. Epub 2018 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

2
Effect of Digital Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids on Speech Intelligibility in Both Quiet and Noisy Environments.
Noise Health. 2024;26(121):220-225. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_67_23. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
4
The impact of a speaker's voice quality on auditory perception and cognition: a behavioral and subjective approach.
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 30;14:1243249. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1243249. eCollection 2023.
5
Measuring speech intelligibility with deaf and hard-of-hearing children: A systematic review.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024 Mar 17;29(2):265-277. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enad054.
6
The Effect of Breathy Vocal Quality on Speech Intelligibility and Listening Effort in Background Noise.
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231206925. doi: 10.1177/23312165231206925.
7
Pareto-Optimized Non-Negative Matrix Factorization Approach to the Cleaning of Alaryngeal Speech Signals.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 16;15(14):3644. doi: 10.3390/cancers15143644.
8
Acoustic voice characteristics with and without wearing a facemask.
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 11;11(1):5651. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85130-8.
9
Effect of Noise on Speech Intelligibility and Perceived Listening Effort in Head and Neck Cancer.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Jun 18;30(3S):1329-1342. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00149. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
10
The impact of noise in the operating theatre: a review of the evidence.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 Feb;103(2):83-87. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.7001.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effect of CAPE-V Sentences on Cepstral/Spectral Acoustic Measures in Dysphonic Speakers.
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2015;67(1):15-20. doi: 10.1159/000371656. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
2
Street-level noise in an urban setting: assessment and contribution to personal exposure.
Environ Health. 2015 Feb 28;14:18. doi: 10.1186/s12940-015-0006-y.
3
Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral- and spectral-based measures during continuous speech.
J Voice. 2013 Jul;27(4):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 May 16.
4
Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics.
Speech Commun. 1996 Dec 1;20(3):255-272. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6393(96)00063-5.
6
Sequencing versus nonsequencing working memory in understanding of rapid speech by older listeners.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2006 Jul-Aug;17(7):506-18. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17.7.6.
7
The influence of noise on vowel and consonant cues.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Dec;118(6):3874-88. doi: 10.1121/1.2118407.
9
Cepstral peak prominence: a more reliable measure of dysphonia.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003 Apr;112(4):324-33. doi: 10.1177/000348940311200406.
10
The relationship between cepstral peak prominence and selected parameters of dysphonia.
J Voice. 2002 Mar;16(1):20-7. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(02)00067-x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验