• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

佩戴和不佩戴口罩时的声学语音特征。

Acoustic voice characteristics with and without wearing a facemask.

机构信息

Voice Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine and Health, D18, Susan Wakil Health Building, Camperdown Campus, The University of Sydney, Western Avenue, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 11;11(1):5651. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85130-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-85130-8
PMID:33707509
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7970997/
Abstract

Facemasks are essential for healthcare workers but characteristics of the voice whilst wearing this personal protective equipment are not well understood. In the present study, we compared acoustic voice measures in recordings of sixteen adults producing standardised vocal tasks with and without wearing either a surgical mask or a KN95 mask. Data were analysed for mean spectral levels at 0-1 kHz and 1-8 kHz regions, an energy ratio between 0-1 and 1-8 kHz (LH1000), harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS), and vocal intensity. In connected speech there was significant attenuation of mean spectral level at 1-8 kHz region and there was no significant change in this measure at 0-1 kHz. Mean spectral levels of vowel did not change significantly in mask-wearing conditions. LH1000 for connected speech significantly increased whilst wearing either a surgical mask or KN95 mask but no significant change in this measure was found for vowel. HNR was higher in the mask-wearing conditions than the no-mask condition. CPPS and vocal intensity did not change in mask-wearing conditions. These findings implied an attenuation effects of wearing these types of masks on the voice spectra with surgical mask showing less impact than the KN95.

摘要

口罩对于医护人员来说是必不可少的,但人们对佩戴这种个人防护设备时声音的特点还不太了解。在本研究中,我们比较了十六名成年人在佩戴或不佩戴外科口罩或 KN95 口罩时,进行标准发声任务的录音中的声学语音测量值。对 0-1kHz 和 1-8kHz 区域的平均频谱水平、0-1 和 1-8kHz 之间的能量比(LH1000)、谐波噪声比(HNR)、平滑倒谱峰 prominance(CPPS)和发声强度进行了分析。在连续语音中,1-8kHz 区域的平均频谱水平有明显的衰减,而在 0-1kHz 区域没有明显的变化。在佩戴口罩的情况下,元音的平均频谱水平没有明显变化。无论是佩戴外科口罩还是 KN95 口罩,在连续语音中 LH1000 都会显著增加,但在元音中没有发现这一测量值有显著变化。HNR 在佩戴口罩的情况下比不戴口罩的情况要高。在佩戴口罩的情况下,CPPS 和发声强度没有变化。这些发现表明,佩戴这些类型的口罩会对声音频谱产生衰减效应,而外科口罩的影响比 KN95 口罩要小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df2/7970997/1d6163b8f436/41598_2021_85130_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df2/7970997/1161def067f6/41598_2021_85130_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df2/7970997/0fd8ebd47811/41598_2021_85130_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df2/7970997/9260551ea7cb/41598_2021_85130_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df2/7970997/4248bd8acf7b/41598_2021_85130_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df2/7970997/1d6163b8f436/41598_2021_85130_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df2/7970997/1161def067f6/41598_2021_85130_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df2/7970997/0fd8ebd47811/41598_2021_85130_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df2/7970997/9260551ea7cb/41598_2021_85130_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df2/7970997/4248bd8acf7b/41598_2021_85130_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df2/7970997/1d6163b8f436/41598_2021_85130_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Acoustic voice characteristics with and without wearing a facemask.佩戴和不佩戴口罩时的声学语音特征。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 11;11(1):5651. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85130-8.
2
COVID-19: Acoustic Measures of Voice in Individuals Wearing Different Facemasks.COVID-19:不同口罩佩戴者的嗓音声学测量。
J Voice. 2023 Nov;37(6):971.e1-971.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
3
Acoustic characteristics of fricatives, amplitude of formants and clarity of speech produced without and with a medical mask.摩擦音的声学特征、共振峰幅度和使用与不使用医用口罩说话的清晰度。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Mar;57(2):366-380. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12705. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
4
Does the wearing of masks change voice and speech parameters?戴口罩是否会改变声音和言语参数?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Apr;279(4):1701-1708. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07086-9. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
5
Effect of Face Masks on Voice Quality Associated with Young and Older Chinese Adult Speakers.口罩对中国青年和老年成年说话者语音质量的影响。
J Voice. 2024 Jun 3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.04.025.
6
Impact of Face Masks on Speech Acoustics and Vocal Effort in Healthcare Professionals.口罩对面部语音声学和医护人员发声用力的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2022 Feb;132(2):391-397. doi: 10.1002/lary.29763. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
7
Acoustic voice analysis in the COVID-19 era.新冠疫情时代的声学语音分析
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2021 Feb;41(1):1-5. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N1002. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
8
Are Acoustic Markers of Voice and Speech Signals Affected by Nose-and-Mouth-Covering Respiratory Protective Masks?口鼻覆盖式呼吸防护口罩会影响语音和言语信号的声学标记吗?
J Voice. 2023 May;37(3):468.e1-468.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
9
Voice Differences When Wearing and Not Wearing a Surgical Mask.佩戴和不佩戴外科口罩时的声音差异。
J Voice. 2023 May;37(3):467.e1-467.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.01.026. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
10
Effect of FFP2/3 Masks on Voice Range Profile Measurement and Voice Acoustics in Routine Voice Diagnostics.FFP2/3 口罩对常规语音诊断中的语音范围谱测量和语音声学的影响。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2022;74(5):335-344. doi: 10.1159/000524299. Epub 2022 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of talker gender and face masks on the speech recognition of 6-year-old children in a classroom.说话者性别和口罩对6岁儿童在教室中语音识别的影响。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 16;13:1430530. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1430530. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of medical mask on voice in patients with dysphonia.医用口罩对发声障碍患者嗓音的影响。
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 May 12;11(1):10-16. doi: 10.1002/wjo2.181. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Effects of Distance, Noise, and Personal Respiratory Protective Equipment on Speech Comprehension in Simulated Critical Care Setting.

本文引用的文献

1
Vocal Self-Perception of Home Office Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间居家办公者的嗓音自我感知。
J Voice. 2023 Jan;37(1):144.e15-144.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.10.016. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
2
Face masks can be devastating for people with hearing loss.口罩对听力受损者可能是灾难性的。
BMJ. 2020 Jul 9;370:m2683. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2683.
3
Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks.呼气中呼吸道病毒的释放和口罩的效果。
距离、噪音和个人呼吸防护设备对模拟重症监护环境中言语理解的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 12;13(4):398. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13040398.
4
Investigating the moments of "aha" and "hmm" through acoustic analysis of voice and speech in pre-service physics teacher education-A novel method for identifying significant learning moments.通过职前物理教师教育中语音和言语的声学分析探究“顿悟”和“思考”时刻——一种识别重要学习时刻的新方法。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0314344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314344. eCollection 2025.
5
Effects of face protector devices on acoustic parameters of voice.面部防护装置对嗓音声学参数的影响。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2024 Dec;44(6):377-391. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N2851.
6
Effects on communication due to face mask use: an integrative review.使用口罩对面部交流的影响:综合评价。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2023 Oct 9;76(4):e20220674. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0674. eCollection 2023.
7
The Impact of Protective Face Coverings on Acoustic Markers in Voice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.防护面罩对语音声学标志物的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 12;12(18):5922. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185922.
8
Acoustic and perceptual impact of face masks on speech: A scoping review.口罩对面部语音的声学和感知影响:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 25;18(8):e0285009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285009. eCollection 2023.
9
The correlation between six-minute walking distance and maximum phonation time in healthy adults.健康成年人六分钟步行距离与最大发声时间之间的相关性。
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Feb 5;69(1):40-45. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2023.10944. eCollection 2023 Mar.
10
The effects of face mask on speech production and its implication for forensic speaker identification-A cross-linguistic study.口罩对面部语音产生的影响及其对口音鉴定的启示——一项跨语言研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 30;18(3):e0283724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283724. eCollection 2023.
Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):676-680. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0843-2. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
4
Effects of Fundamental Frequency, Vocal Intensity, Sample Duration, and Vowel Context in Cepstral and Spectral Measures of Dysphonic Voices.基频、发声强度、样本时长及元音语境对嗓音障碍语音的倒谱和频谱测量的影响
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 May 22;63(5):1326-1339. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00049. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
5
Medical masks vs N95 respirators for preventing COVID-19 in healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.医用口罩与 N95 呼吸器预防医护人员感染 COVID-19:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2020 Jul;14(4):365-373. doi: 10.1111/irv.12745. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
6
The maximum audible low-pass cutoff frequency for speech.言语可听度的最大低通截止频率。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Dec;146(6):EL496. doi: 10.1121/1.5140032.
7
Acoustic voice variation within and between speakers.说话人内和说话人间的声学嗓音变化。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Sep;146(3):1568. doi: 10.1121/1.5125134.
8
The Impact of Nasalance on Cepstral Peak Prominence and Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio.鼻音对谐波峰值突出度和声噪比的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2019 Aug;129(8):E299-E304. doi: 10.1002/lary.27685. Epub 2018 Dec 25.
9
Immediate Effects of the Semi-Occluded Ventilation Mask on Subjects Diagnosed With Functional Dysphonia and Subjects With Normal Voices.半封闭通气面罩对功能性发音障碍患者和正常嗓音患者的即时影响。
J Voice. 2020 May;34(3):398-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
10
The relationship between acoustical and perceptual measures of vocal effort.声学和感知测量在发声努力方面的关系。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Sep;144(3):1643. doi: 10.1121/1.5055234.