de Vocht Frank, Tilling Kate, Pliakas Triantafyllos, Angus Colin, Egan Matt, Brennan Alan, Campbell Rona, Hickman Matthew
NIHR School for Public Health Research, Sheffield, UK.
School of Social and Community Medicine,University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Sep;71(9):912-918. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-208931. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
Control of alcohol licensing at local government level is a key component of alcohol policy in England. There is, however, only weak evidence of any public health improvement. We used a novel natural experiment design to estimate the impact of new local alcohol licensing policies on hospital admissions and crime.
We used Home Office licensing data (2007-2012) to identify (1) interventions: local areas where both a cumulative impact zone and increased licensing enforcement were introduced in 2011; and (2) controls: local areas with neither. Outcomes were 2009-2015 alcohol-related hospital admissions, violent and sexual crimes, and antisocial behaviour. Bayesian structural time series were used to create postintervention synthetic time series (counterfactuals) based on weighted time series in control areas. Intervention effects were calculated from differences between measured and expected trends. Validation analyses were conducted using randomly selected controls.
5 intervention and 86 control areas were identified. Intervention was associated with an average reduction in alcohol-related hospital admissions of 6.3% (95% credible intervals (CI) -12.8% to 0.2%) and to lesser extent with a reduced in violent crimes, especially up to 2013 (-4.6%, 95% CI -10.7% to 1.4%). There was weak evidence of an effect on sexual crimes up 2013 (-8.4%, 95% CI -21.4% to 4.6%) and insufficient evidence of an effect on antisocial behaviour as a result of a change in reporting.
Moderate reductions in alcohol-related hospital admissions and violent and sexual crimes were associated with introduction of local alcohol licensing policies. This novel methodology holds promise for use in other natural experiments in public health.
在英国,地方政府层面的酒精许可管制是酒精政策的关键组成部分。然而,几乎没有证据表明这对公众健康有任何改善。我们采用了一种新颖的自然实验设计来评估新的地方酒精许可政策对医院入院率和犯罪的影响。
我们利用英国内政部的许可数据(2007 - 2012年)来确定:(1)干预措施:2011年引入了累积影响区和加强许可执法的地方区域;(2)对照区域:既没有引入累积影响区也没有加强许可执法的地方区域。结果指标为2009 - 2015年与酒精相关的医院入院率、暴力和性犯罪以及反社会行为。使用贝叶斯结构时间序列,根据对照区域的加权时间序列创建干预后的合成时间序列(反事实)。通过测量趋势与预期趋势之间的差异来计算干预效果。使用随机选择的对照进行验证分析。
确定了5个干预区域和86个对照区域。干预措施与酒精相关医院入院率平均降低6.3%(95%可信区间(CI)为 - 12.8%至0.2%)相关,在较小程度上与暴力犯罪减少相关,尤其是到2013年( - 4.6%,95% CI为 - 10.7%至1.4%)。在2013年之前,对性犯罪有影响的证据较弱( - 8.4%,95% CI为 - 21.4%至4.6%),并且由于报告方式的变化,对反社会行为有影响的证据不足。
地方酒精许可政策的引入与酒精相关医院入院率以及暴力和性犯罪的适度降低有关。这种新颖的方法有望用于公共卫生领域的其他自然实验。