Suppr超能文献

孟加拉国卫生服务用户反馈系统混合方法现实主义评价方案

Protocol for a mixed-methods realist evaluation of a health service user feedback system in Bangladesh.

作者信息

Ebenso Bassey, Huque Rumana, Azdi Zunayed, Elsey Helen, Nasreen Shammi, Mirzoev Tolib

机构信息

Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

ARK Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 5;7(6):e017743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017743.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Responsiveness to service users' views is a widely recognised objective of health systems. A key component of responsive health systems is effective interaction between users and service providers. Despite a growing literature on patient feedback from high-income settings, less is known about effectiveness of such systems in low-income and middle-income countries.

METHODOLOGY AND ANALYSIS

This paper disseminates the protocol for an 18-month 'RESPOND' project that aims to evaluate the system of collecting and responding to user feedback in Bangladesh. This mixed-method study uses a realist evaluation approach to examine user feedback systems at two Upazila health complexes in Comilla District of Bangladesh, and comprises three steps: (1) initial theory development; (2) theory validation; and (3) theory refinement and development of lessons learnt. The project also uses (1) process evaluation to understand and ; (2) statistical analysis of patient feedback to clarify the nature of issues reported; (3) social science methods to illuminate feedback processes and user and provider experiences; and (4) health policy and systems research to clarify issues related to integration of feedback systems with quality assurance and human resource management. During data analysis, qualitative and quantitative findings will be integrated throughout to help achieve study objectives. Analysis of qualitative and quantitative data will be done using a convergent mixed-methods model, involving continuous triangulation of multiple data sets to facilitate greater understanding of the context of user feedback systems including the links with relevant policies, practices and programmes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approvals were obtained from the University of Leeds and the Bangladesh Medical Research Council. All data collected for this study will be anonymised, and identifying characteristics of respondents will not appear in a final manuscript or reports. The study findings will be presented at scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

摘要

引言

响应服务使用者的意见是卫生系统广泛认可的目标。响应式卫生系统的一个关键组成部分是使用者与服务提供者之间的有效互动。尽管关于高收入环境下患者反馈的文献越来越多,但对于此类系统在低收入和中等收入国家的有效性了解较少。

方法与分析

本文传播了一项为期18个月的“响应”项目的方案,该项目旨在评估孟加拉国收集和回应使用者反馈的系统。这项混合方法研究采用现实主义评估方法,对孟加拉国科米拉区两个乡卫生综合设施的使用者反馈系统进行研究,包括三个步骤:(1)初始理论发展;(2)理论验证;(3)理论完善及经验教训的总结。该项目还采用(1)过程评估来了解并;(2)对患者反馈进行统计分析,以阐明所报告问题的性质;(3)运用社会科学方法来阐明反馈过程以及使用者和提供者的体验;(4)开展卫生政策与系统研究,以阐明与将反馈系统与质量保证和人力资源管理相结合相关的问题。在数据分析过程中,定性和定量研究结果将全程整合,以帮助实现研究目标。定性和定量数据的分析将采用收敛性混合方法模型,包括对多个数据集进行持续的三角互证,以便更深入地了解使用者反馈系统的背景,包括与相关政策、实践和项目的联系。

伦理与传播

已获得利兹大学和孟加拉国医学研究理事会的伦理批准。本研究收集的所有数据将进行匿名处理,受访者的识别特征不会出现在最终稿件或报告中。研究结果将在科学会议上展示,并发表在同行评审期刊上。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c63/5734574/975b1fa1ae3a/bmjopen-2017-017743f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验