Piccoli Micaela, Mullineris Barbara, Santi Daniele, Gozzo Davide
Division of General, Emergency Surgery and New Technologies, OCSAE (Ospedale Civile Sant'Agostino Estense), Via Giardini 1455, Baggiovara, Modena, Italy.
Unit of Endocrinology, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Curr Surg Rep. 2017;5(8):17. doi: 10.1007/s40137-017-0180-7. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
The robotic surgical approach for minimally invasive thyroid surgery has been well described from the Korean surgeons and shows a wide spread diffusion in Asian area. This paper gives a systematic review aiming to pointed out the interest and the way of behaving of the European surgeons about the role of the robotic thyroidectomy (RT).
A literature search was performed using Pubmed, MEDLINE, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, including only papers wrote from european surgeons enrolling patients operated in Europe. Outcomes of interest included patients characteristics, patients position, surgical devices, surgical technique, surgical outcomes, and complications. Eighteen studies have been included in the analysis, published from 2011 to 2017. An overall number of 1108 patients were treated in studies included. In the 44.4% of studies (eight trials), the Kuppersmith position was chosen, whereas in the 22.2% (four trials), the Chung position was selected, with a mean length on axilla skin incision of 5.8 ± 1.5 cm. Considering the characteristics of the surgical technique, the mean total surgical time was 166.8 ± 36.6 min (including total thyroidectomy and loboisthmectomy together), divided three consecutive phases, such as mean working space was 50.7 ± 21.8 min, mean docking time 16.0 ± 11.9 min and mean console time 102.87 ± 38.8 min. Considering the complications, only 50% of studies included reported data about acute complications. In particular, the most frequent was hypocalcemia, occurring in 32 cases (2.9%). RLN palsy occurred in 29 patients (2.6%), definitive in 13.8% of these cases and transient in 86.2%. Only nine studies reported the discharge time, with a mean of 2.4 ± 1.2 days after surgery.
Despite the papers included in the study show a different way of collecting data, the transaxillary approach for robotic thyroidectomy for European patients is both feasible and safe. This procedure has to be carried out by surgeons expert in thyroid surgery with knowledge in robotic procedure. In the future, the incoming of dedicated instruments could improve and developed this technique.
韩国外科医生对机器人辅助微创甲状腺手术方法已有详尽描述,且在亚洲地区广泛传播。本文进行系统综述,旨在指出欧洲外科医生对机器人甲状腺切除术(RT)的兴趣及操作方式。
使用Pubmed、MEDLINE、Cochrane和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库进行文献检索,仅纳入欧洲外科医生撰写的、纳入在欧洲接受手术患者的论文。关注的结果包括患者特征、患者体位、手术器械、手术技术、手术结果及并发症。分析纳入了18项研究,发表于2011年至2017年。纳入研究共治疗了1108例患者。在44.4%的研究(八项试验)中选择了库珀史密斯体位,而在22.2%(四项试验)中选择了钟氏体位,腋窝皮肤切口平均长度为5.8±1.5厘米。考虑手术技术特点,平均总手术时间为166.8±36.6分钟(包括全甲状腺切除术和甲状腺叶峡部切除术),分为三个连续阶段,如平均操作空间为50.7±21.8分钟,平均对接时间16.0±11.9分钟,平均控制台操作时间102.87±38.8分钟。考虑并发症情况,仅50%的纳入研究报告了急性并发症数据。具体而言,最常见的是低钙血症,发生32例(2.9%)。喉返神经麻痹发生在29例患者(2.6%)中,其中13.8%为永久性,86.2%为暂时性。仅有九项研究报告了出院时间,平均为术后2.4±1.2天。
尽管纳入研究的论文显示出不同的数据收集方式,但欧洲患者经腋窝入路机器人甲状腺切除术既可行又安全。该手术必须由精通甲状腺手术且具备机器人手术知识的外科医生进行。未来,专用器械的出现可能会改进和发展这项技术。