Suppr超能文献

从促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂转换为促性腺激素释放激素激动剂:10例芬兰晚期前列腺癌患者的病例报告

Switching from an LHRH Antagonist to an LHRH Agonist: A Case Report of 10 Finnish Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer.

作者信息

Visapää Harri

机构信息

Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Oncol Ther. 2017;5(1):119-123. doi: 10.1007/s40487-017-0040-8. Epub 2017 Feb 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues are widely used for the treatment of advanced hormone-dependent prostate cancer. However, there are currently no clinical guidelines for switching between LHRH analogues. It has been reported that there may be clinical benefits for patients switching between different formulations of LHRH agonists, as well as from an LHRH agonist to LHRH antagonist, but there are no published data on switching from an LHRH antagonist to an LHRH agonist. In this paper, we summarize the clinical notes of 10 patients with hormone-sensitive advanced prostate cancer who switched from an LHRH antagonist to an LHRH agonist.

METHODS

Patients with T3N0M0-T4N1M1 prostate cancer experiencing injection site reactions, such as pain and swelling, with monthly degarelix (Firmagon) subcutaneous injections were switched to the 3-monthly leuprorelin acetate implant (Leuprorelin Sandoz) subcutaneous injections.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 75 years (SD 8.3; range 59-85) and Gleason scores ranged from 7 to 9. The mean [±standard deviation (SD)] duration of degarelix treatment was 5 ± 3.7 months (range 2-13). After switching, prostate serum antigen levels were comparable or reduced from those measured prior to switching, showing that efficacy was not compromised. Throughout the course of treatment, no patients reported injection site reactions. Patients reported increased satisfaction with the leuprorelin acetate implant versus degarelix, mainly because of a lack of injection site reactions and reduced frequency of injection.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of the clinical experience and potential cost implications of switching from an LHRH antagonist to an LHRH agonist. These data are consistent with other experiences of switching between LHRH analogues in terms of efficacy, safety, and potential cost savings, and provide preliminary evidence that the switch from an LHRH antagonist to an agonist is safe and equally efficacious.

摘要

引言

促黄体生成激素释放激素(LHRH)类似物广泛用于治疗晚期激素依赖性前列腺癌。然而,目前尚无关于LHRH类似物之间转换的临床指南。据报道,在不同剂型的LHRH激动剂之间转换,以及从LHRH激动剂转换为LHRH拮抗剂,可能对患者有临床益处,但尚无从LHRH拮抗剂转换为LHRH激动剂的公开数据。在本文中,我们总结了10例从LHRH拮抗剂转换为LHRH激动剂的激素敏感性晚期前列腺癌患者的临床记录。

方法

患有T3N0M0 - T4N1M1前列腺癌且每月接受度洛西汀(Firmagon)皮下注射出现注射部位反应(如疼痛和肿胀)的患者,改为每三个月接受醋酸亮丙瑞林植入剂(Leuprorelin Sandoz)皮下注射。

结果

患者平均年龄为75岁(标准差8.3;范围59 - 85岁), Gleason评分范围为7至9分。度洛西汀治疗的平均[±标准差(SD)]持续时间为5 ± 3.7个月(范围2 - 13个月)。转换后,前列腺血清抗原水平与转换前测量的水平相当或降低,表明疗效未受影响。在整个治疗过程中,没有患者报告注射部位反应。与度洛西汀相比,患者对醋酸亮丙瑞林植入剂的满意度有所提高,主要原因是没有注射部位反应且注射频率降低。

结论

这是关于从LHRH拮抗剂转换为LHRH激动剂的临床经验和潜在成本影响的首次报告。这些数据在疗效、安全性和潜在成本节约方面与LHRH类似物之间转换的其他经验一致,并提供了初步证据表明从LHRH拮抗剂转换为激动剂是安全且疗效相当的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c4/5488110/a90e58f3a7ca/40487_2017_40_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验