Thomson Nicholas D, Centifanti Luna C M
Department of Psychology, University of Durham, South Road, Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.
Department of Clinical Psychology, Liverpool University, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2018 Apr;49(2):197-208. doi: 10.1007/s10578-017-0741-0.
This study aimed to assess whether groups of aggressive children differed on psychopathic traits, and neuropsychological and neurobiological measures of prefrontal functioning consistent with the objectives of their aggression-reactive or proactive. Including 110 typically developing children (9-11 years), a latent class analysis identified a low aggression group, a high reactive aggression group, and a mixed (high reactive and proactive) aggression group. Results show high callous-unemotional traits and low resting respiratory sinus arrhythmia increased the likelihood of children being in the mixed aggression group, when compared to the reactive and low aggression groups. However, deficits in planning and inhibitory control increased the likelihood of children being in the reactive aggression group, when compared to the mixed and low aggression groups. Executive functioning deficits did not differentiate the mixed group from the low aggression group. These findings highlight psychobiological and executive functioning differences that may explain heterogeneity in childhood aggression.
本研究旨在评估具有攻击性的儿童群体在心理变态特质、与他们的攻击性反应性或主动性目标一致的前额叶功能的神经心理学和神经生物学测量方面是否存在差异。该研究纳入了110名发育正常的儿童(9至11岁),通过潜在类别分析确定了一个低攻击性组、一个高反应性攻击组和一个混合(高反应性和主动性)攻击组。结果显示,与反应性攻击组和低攻击性组相比,高度冷酷无情的特质和低静息呼吸性窦性心律不齐增加了儿童属于混合攻击组的可能性。然而,与混合攻击组和低攻击性组相比,计划和抑制控制方面的缺陷增加了儿童属于反应性攻击组的可能性。执行功能缺陷并未区分混合组和低攻击性组。这些发现突出了心理生物学和执行功能方面的差异,这些差异可能解释儿童期攻击行为的异质性。