Suppr超能文献

晚期和转移性胰腺癌治疗中化疗方案的毒性:一项网络荟萃分析。

Toxicity of chemotherapy regimens in advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer therapy: A network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Jiangxi Pingxiang People's Hospital, Pingxiang, P. R. China.

出版信息

J Cell Biochem. 2018 Jul;119(7):5082-5103. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26266. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

Abstract

This network meta-analysis is adopted in order to compare the toxicity of different chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about different chemotherapy regimens for advanced/metastatic PC were included in this network meta-analysis using Cochrane Library and PubMed electronic databases. The network meta-analysis was performed to combine direct and indirect evidence in order to calculate the odd ratios (OR) and draw a surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve. A total of 19 RCTs were enrolled in this network meta-analysis including 12 chemotherapy regimens (Gemcitabine, Gemcitabine + S-1 [tegafur], Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, Gemcitabine + Capecitabine, Gemcitabine + Cisplatin, FOLFIRINOX [oxaliplatin + irinotecan + fluorouracil + leucovorin], Gemcitabine + oxaliplatin, Gemcitabine + irinotecan, Gemcitabine + Exatecan, Gemcitabine + pemetrexed, Gemcitabine + 5-FU, S-1). The incidence of anemia of Gemcitabine + Capecitabine regimen was higher compared with Gemcitabine regimen, Gemcitabine + pemetrexed regimen exhibited the highest incidence rates of anemia and neutropenia; while Gemcitabine + S-1, Gemcitabine + Cisplatin and FOLFIRINOX regimens exhibited the highest incidence rates of neutropenia. However, S-1 regimen exhibited lower incidence rates of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. Moreover, the incidence rates of nausea/vomiting and rash of Gemcitabine + S-1 regimen were higher compared with Gemcitabine regimen, while Gemcitabine + Cisplatin regimen had the highest incidence rate of nausea/vomiting. This study demonstrated that the hematologic toxicity of S-1 regimen was the lowest, while Gemcitabine regimen exhibited the lowest incidence rate of non-hematologic toxicity, providing guidance for the treatment of advanced/metastatic PC.

摘要

本网状荟萃分析旨在比较不同化疗方案治疗晚期/转移性胰腺癌(PC)的毒性。使用 Cochrane 图书馆和 PubMed 电子数据库纳入了关于晚期/转移性 PC 不同化疗方案的随机对照试验(RCT)。网状荟萃分析旨在结合直接和间接证据,以计算比值比(OR)并绘制累积排序概率曲线(SUCRA)。本网状荟萃分析共纳入 19 项 RCT,包括 12 种化疗方案(吉西他滨、吉西他滨+替吉奥、吉西他滨+白蛋白紫杉醇、吉西他滨+卡培他滨、吉西他滨+顺铂、FOLFIRINOX[奥沙利铂+伊立替康+氟尿嘧啶+亚叶酸钙]、吉西他滨+奥沙利铂、吉西他滨+伊立替康、吉西他滨+艾立布林、吉西他滨+培美曲塞、吉西他滨+氟尿嘧啶、替吉奥)。与吉西他滨方案相比,吉西他滨+卡培他滨方案贫血发生率更高,吉西他滨+培美曲塞方案贫血和中性粒细胞减少症发生率最高;而吉西他滨+替吉奥、吉西他滨+顺铂和 FOLFIRINOX 方案中性粒细胞减少症发生率最高。然而,替吉奥方案白细胞减少症和血小板减少症发生率较低。此外,吉西他滨+替吉奥方案恶心/呕吐和皮疹发生率高于吉西他滨方案,而吉西他滨+顺铂方案恶心/呕吐发生率最高。本研究表明,替吉奥方案血液学毒性最低,而吉西他滨方案非血液学毒性发生率最低,为晚期/转移性 PC 的治疗提供了指导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验