Suppr超能文献

口服葡萄糖耐量试验中达到血糖峰值的时间可识别糖尿病前期风险。

Time to glucose peak during an oral glucose tolerance test identifies prediabetes risk.

机构信息

Section on Ethnicity and Health, Diabetes Endocrinology and Obesity Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA.

Laboratory of Biological Modeling, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2017 Nov;87(5):484-491. doi: 10.1111/cen.13416. Epub 2017 Aug 6.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Morphological characteristics of the glucose curve during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (time to peak and shape) may reflect different phenotypes of insulin secretion and action, but their ability to predict diabetes risk is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the ability of time to glucose peak and curve shape to detect prediabetes and β-cell function.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

In a cross-sectional evaluation using an OGTT, 145 adults without diabetes (age 42±9 years (mean±SD), range 24-62 years, BMI 29.2±5.3 kg/m , range 19.9-45.2 kg/m ) were characterized by peak (30 minutes vs >30 minutes) and shape (biphasic vs monophasic).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prediabetes and disposition index (DI)-a marker of β-cell function.

RESULTS

Prediabetes was diagnosed in 36% (52/145) of participants. Peak>30 minutes, not monophasic curve, was associated with increased odds of prediabetes (OR: 4.0 vs 1.1; P<.001). Both monophasic curve and peak>30 minutes were associated with lower DI (P≤.01). Time to glucose peak and glucose area under the curves (AUC) were independent predictors of DI (adjR =0.45, P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Glucose peak >30 minutes was a stronger independent indicator of prediabetes and β-cell function than the monophasic curve. Time to glucose peak may be an important tool that could enhance prediabetes risk stratification.

摘要

背景

口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)期间葡萄糖曲线的形态特征(达峰时间和形状)可能反映了不同的胰岛素分泌和作用表型,但它们预测糖尿病风险的能力尚不确定。

目的

比较达峰时间和曲线形状预测糖尿病前期和β细胞功能的能力。

设计和参与者

在一项横断面评估中,使用 OGTT 对 145 名无糖尿病的成年人(年龄 42±9 岁(均值±标准差),范围 24-62 岁,BMI 29.2±5.3 kg/m ,范围 19.9-45.2 kg/m )进行了特征描述,包括达峰时间(30 分钟 vs >30 分钟)和形状(双峰 vs 单峰)。

主要结局测量

糖尿病前期和β细胞功能标志物——胰岛β细胞功能指数(DI)。

结果

在 145 名参与者中,36%(52/145)被诊断为糖尿病前期。达峰时间>30 分钟、非单峰曲线与糖尿病前期的发生几率增加相关(OR:4.0 比 1.1;P<.001)。单峰曲线和达峰时间>30 分钟均与较低的 DI 相关(P≤.01)。达峰时间和葡萄糖曲线下面积(AUC)是 DI 的独立预测因素(adjR =0.45,P<.001)。

结论

达峰时间>30 分钟是糖尿病前期和β细胞功能的独立预测指标,比单峰曲线更为有力。达峰时间可能是增强糖尿病前期风险分层的重要工具。

相似文献

1
Time to glucose peak during an oral glucose tolerance test identifies prediabetes risk.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2017 Nov;87(5):484-491. doi: 10.1111/cen.13416. Epub 2017 Aug 6.
2
Two- vs one-hour glucose tolerance testing: Predicting prediabetes in adolescent girls with obesity.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2019 Mar;20(2):154-159. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12803. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
4
Impact of short-term exercise training intensity on β-cell function in older obese adults with prediabetes.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 Dec 1;125(6):1979-1986. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00680.2018. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
6
Metabolic and Genetic Determinants of Glucose Shape After Oral Challenge in Obese Youths: A Longitudinal Study.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Feb 1;105(2):534-42. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgz207.
7
Disposition index identifies defective beta-cell function in cystic fibrosis subjects with normal glucose tolerance.
J Cyst Fibros. 2015 Jan;14(1):135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

3
Cardiovascular risk, fatty liver disease, glucose and insulin curve among prediabetes phenotypes in Peruvian population.
Am J Med Open. 2022 Feb 2;7:100007. doi: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2022.100007. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Myths and methodologies: Assessing glycaemic control and associated regulatory mechanisms in human physiology research.
Exp Physiol. 2024 Sep;109(9):1461-1477. doi: 10.1113/EP091433. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
5
The glucose tolerance peak parameter revisited. Definition for a novel use in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus confirmation.
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2024 Apr 26;23(1):1351-1357. doi: 10.1007/s40200-024-01432-4. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
High-accuracy noninvasive continuous glucose monitoring using OCT angiography-purified blood scattering signals in human skin.
Biomed Opt Express. 2024 Jan 24;15(2):991-1003. doi: 10.1364/BOE.506092. eCollection 2024 Feb 1.
8
Estimating insulin sensitivity and β-cell function from the oral glucose tolerance test: validation of a new insulin sensitivity and secretion (ISS) model.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Apr 1;326(4):E454-E471. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00189.2023. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
9
Characteristics and Risk of Diabetes in People With Rare Glucose Response Curve During an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Feb 20;109(3):e975-e982. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad698.
10
Hypoglycemia and anxiolysis mediated by levofloxacin treatment in diabetic rats.
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2023 Jun 5;22(2):1197-1209. doi: 10.1007/s40200-023-01234-0. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Shape of the OGTT glucose curve and risk of impaired glucose metabolism in the EGIR-RISC cohort.
Metabolism. 2017 May;70:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
2
Glucose patterns during the OGTT and risk of future diabetes in an urban Indian population: The CARRS study.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Apr;126:192-197. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
3
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes.
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jan;40(Suppl 1):S11-S24. doi: 10.2337/dc17-S005.
5
Heterogeneity in glucose response curves during an oral glucose tolerance test and associated cardiometabolic risk.
Endocrine. 2017 Feb;55(2):427-434. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-1126-z. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
8
Diabetes: T2DM risk prediction in populations of African descent.
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016 Mar;12(3):131-2. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2016.2. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
9
A Mathematical Model of the Pathogenesis, Prevention, and Reversal of Type 2 Diabetes.
Endocrinology. 2016 Feb;157(2):624-35. doi: 10.1210/en.2015-1564. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
10
Prevalence of and Trends in Diabetes Among Adults in the United States, 1988-2012.
JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1021-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10029.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验