Kim Joon Young, Michaliszyn Sara F, Nasr Alexis, Lee SoJung, Tfayli Hala, Hannon Tamara, Hughan Kara S, Bacha Fida, Arslanian Silva
Division of Weight Management and Wellness, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Human Performance and Exercise Science, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH.
Diabetes Care. 2016 Aug;39(8):1431-9. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0352. Epub 2016 Jun 12.
The shape of the glucose response curve during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), monophasic versus biphasic, identifies physiologically distinct groups of individuals with differences in insulin secretion and sensitivity. We aimed to verify the value of the OGTT-glucose response curve against more sensitive clamp-measured biomarkers of type 2 diabetes risk, and to examine incretin/pancreatic hormones and free fatty acid associations in these curve phenotypes in obese adolescents without diabetes.
A total of 277 obese adolescents without diabetes completed a 2-h OGTT and were categorized to either a monophasic or a biphasic group. Body composition, abdominal adipose tissue, OGTT-based metabolic parameters, and incretin/pancreatic hormone levels were examined. A subset of 106 participants had both hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic and hyperglycemic clamps to measure in vivo insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, and β-cell function relative to insulin sensitivity.
Despite similar fasting and 2-h glucose and insulin concentrations, the monophasic group had significantly higher glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and free fatty acid OGTT areas under the curve compared with the biphasic group, with no differences in levels of glucagon, total glucagon-like peptide 1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, and pancreatic polypeptide. Furthermore, the monophasic group had significantly lower in vivo hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity, lack of compensatory first and second phase insulin secretion, and impaired β-cell function relative to insulin sensitivity.
In obese youth without diabetes, the risk imparted by the monophasic glucose curve compared with biphasic glucose curve, independent of fasting and 2-h glucose and insulin concentrations, is reflected in lower insulin sensitivity and poorer β-cell function, which are two major pathophysiological biomarkers of type 2 diabetes in youth.
口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)期间葡萄糖反应曲线的形状,单相与双相,可识别出胰岛素分泌和敏感性存在差异的生理上不同的个体群体。我们旨在验证OGTT葡萄糖反应曲线相对于更敏感的钳夹测量的2型糖尿病风险生物标志物的价值,并研究无糖尿病肥胖青少年中这些曲线表型的肠促胰岛素/胰腺激素和游离脂肪酸关联。
共有277名无糖尿病的肥胖青少年完成了2小时的OGTT,并被分为单相组或双相组。检查了身体成分、腹部脂肪组织、基于OGTT的代谢参数以及肠促胰岛素/胰腺激素水平。106名参与者的一个子集进行了高胰岛素正常血糖钳夹和高血糖钳夹,以测量体内胰岛素敏感性、胰岛素分泌以及相对于胰岛素敏感性的β细胞功能。
尽管空腹和2小时血糖及胰岛素浓度相似,但与双相组相比,单相组的葡萄糖、胰岛素、C肽和游离脂肪酸OGTT曲线下面积显著更高,而胰高血糖素、总胰高血糖素样肽1、葡萄糖依赖性促胰岛素多肽和胰多肽水平无差异。此外,单相组的体内肝脏和外周胰岛素敏感性显著降低,缺乏代偿性第一和第二阶段胰岛素分泌,且相对于胰岛素敏感性,β细胞功能受损。
在无糖尿病的肥胖青年中,与双相葡萄糖曲线相比,单相葡萄糖曲线所带来的风险,独立于空腹和2小时血糖及胰岛素浓度,体现在较低的胰岛素敏感性和较差的β细胞功能上,而这是青年2型糖尿病的两个主要病理生理生物标志物。