Plessner Henning, Betsch Tilmann
1 University of Heidelberg.
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2002 Sep;24(3):334-337. doi: 10.1123/jsep.24.3.334.
In their comments on a study on penalty decisions in soccer (Plessner & Betsch, 2001), Mascarenhas, Collins, and Mortimer (2002) point to several factors that, in their view, weaken the external validity of this laboratory study. In our response, we argue that although it may be helpful to substantiate the prior findings in a study closer to the natural setting of refereeing, Mascarenhas et al. provide no conclusive argument as to why the observed judgment biases should vanish under more realistic conditions.
马斯卡雷尼亚斯、柯林斯和莫蒂默(2002年)在对一项关于足球判罚决定的研究(普莱斯纳和贝奇,2001年)发表评论时指出了几个因素,在他们看来,这些因素削弱了这项实验室研究的外部效度。在我们的回应中,我们认为,虽然在一项更接近裁判自然场景的研究中证实先前的发现可能会有所帮助,但马斯卡雷尼亚斯等人并未就为何在更现实的条件下观察到的判断偏差应该消失给出确凿的论据。