• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架置入术后,氯吡格雷与阿司匹林联合应用30个月与12个月双联抗血小板治疗的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of 30-month vs 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin after drug-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

作者信息

Jiang Minghuan, You Joyce H S

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2017 Oct;40(10):789-796. doi: 10.1002/clc.22756. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1002/clc.22756
PMID:28683175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6490524/
Abstract

Continuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) beyond 1 year reduces late stent thrombosis and ischemic events after drug-eluting stents (DES) but increases risk of bleeding. We hypothesized that extending DAPT from 12 months to 30 months in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after DES is cost-effective. A lifelong decision-analytic model was designed to simulate 2 antiplatelet strategies in event-free ACS patients who had completed 12-month DAPT after DES: aspirin monotherapy (75-162 mg daily) and continuation of DAPT (clopidogrel 75 mg daily plus aspirin 75-162 mg daily) for 18 months. Clinical event rates, direct medical costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained were the primary outcomes from the US healthcare provider perspective. Base-case results showed DAPT continuation gained higher QALYs (8.1769 vs 8.1582 QALYs) at lower cost (USD42 982 vs USD44 063). One-way sensitivity analysis found that base-case QALYs were sensitive to odds ratio (OR) of cardiovascular death with DAPT continuation and base-case cost was sensitive to OR of nonfatal stroke with DAPT continuation. DAPT continuation remained cost-effective when the ORs of nonfatal stroke and cardiovascular death were below 1.241 and 1.188, respectively. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, DAPT continuation was the preferred strategy in 74.75% of 10 000 Monte Carlo simulations at willingness-to-pay threshold of 50 000 USD/QALYs. Continuation of DAPT appears to be cost-effective in ACS patients who were event-free for 12-month DAPT after DES. The cost-effectiveness of DAPT for 30 months was highly subject to the OR of nonfatal stroke and OR of death with DAPT continuation.

摘要

药物洗脱支架(DES)植入后双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)超过1年可降低晚期支架血栓形成和缺血事件,但会增加出血风险。我们假设,DES植入后急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者将DAPT从12个月延长至30个月具有成本效益。设计了一个终身决策分析模型,以模拟DES植入后完成12个月DAPT的无事件ACS患者的两种抗血小板策略:阿司匹林单药治疗(每日75 - 162毫克)和继续DAPT(每日氯吡格雷75毫克加阿司匹林75 - 162毫克)18个月。从美国医疗保健提供者的角度来看,临床事件发生率、直接医疗成本和获得的质量调整生命年(QALY)是主要结果。基础病例结果显示,继续DAPT可获得更高的QALY(8.1769对8.1582 QALY),且成本更低(42,982美元对44,063美元)。单向敏感性分析发现,基础病例QALY对继续DAPT时心血管死亡的比值比(OR)敏感,基础病例成本对继续DAPT时非致命性卒中的OR敏感。当非致命性卒中和心血管死亡的OR分别低于1.241和1.188时,继续DAPT仍具有成本效益。在概率敏感性分析中,在支付意愿阈值为50,000美元/QALY的情况下,在10,000次蒙特卡洛模拟中,74.75%的模拟结果显示继续DAPT是首选策略。DES植入后接受12个月DAPT且无事件的ACS患者继续DAPT似乎具有成本效益。DAPT持续30个月的成本效益高度取决于非致命性卒中的OR和继续DAPT时的死亡OR。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of 30-month vs 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin after drug-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架置入术后,氯吡格雷与阿司匹林联合应用30个月与12个月双联抗血小板治疗的成本效益分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Oct;40(10):789-796. doi: 10.1002/clc.22756. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
2
CYP2C19 LOF and GOF-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.CYP2C19功能缺失和功能增强指导下的急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗血小板治疗:一项成本效益分析
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2017 Feb;31(1):39-49. doi: 10.1007/s10557-016-6705-y.
3
6- Versus 24-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Nonresistant to Aspirin: Final Results of the ITALIC Trial (Is There a Life for DES After Discontinuation of Clopidogrel).抗阿司匹林药物洗脱支架植入术后 6 个月与 24 个月双联抗血小板治疗:ITALIC 试验(停用氯吡格雷后 DES 是否仍有生命力)的最终结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1202-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.049.
4
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for 6 Versus 18 Months After Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation.生物可吸收聚合物药物洗脱支架置入 6 个月与 18 个月后双联抗血小板治疗。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1189-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.04.019.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of short-duration dual antiplatelet therapy with newer drug-eluting stent platforms versus longer-duration dual antiplatelet therapy with a second-generation drug-eluting stent in elective percutaneous coronary intervention.在择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中,新型药物洗脱支架平台短期双联抗血小板治疗与第二代药物洗脱支架长期双联抗血小板治疗的成本效益分析。
Coron Artery Dis. 2019 May;30(3):177-182. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000694.
6
Long-term outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes related to prolonging dual antiplatelet therapy more than 12 months after coronary stenting.冠状动脉支架置入术后双联抗血小板治疗延长超过12个月的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的长期预后
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 1;89(7):1176-1184. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26831. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
7
Myocardial Infarction Risk After Discontinuation of Thienopyridine Therapy in the Randomized DAPT Study (Dual Antiplatelet Therapy).随机双抗血小板治疗(DAPT)研究中停用噻吩吡啶类药物治疗后的心肌梗死风险
Circulation. 2017 May 2;135(18):1720-1732. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024835. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
8
Impact of Sex on 2-Year Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated With 6-Month or 24-Month Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Duration: A Pre-Specified Analysis From the PRODIGY Trial.在接受 6 个月或 24 个月双联抗血小板治疗时长的患者中,性别对 2 年临床结局的影响:来自 PRODIGY 试验的预先设定分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep 12;9(17):1780-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.05.046. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
9
Comparison of one-month versus twelve-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: rationale and design of prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled IVUS-ACS and ULTIMATE-DAPT trial.比较血管内超声或血管造影指导下急性冠脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架植入术后 1 个月与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗:前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照 IVUS-ACS 和 ULTIMATE-DAPT 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2021 Jun;236:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
10
Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin for the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome After a 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis From China Payer's Perspective.氯吡格雷与阿司匹林治疗双抗血小板治疗 12 个月后的急性冠状动脉综合征:中国支付方视角的成本效果分析。
Clin Ther. 2018 Dec;40(12):2125-2137. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
CYP2C19 and ABCB1 genetic polymorphisms correlate with the recurrence of ischemic cardiovascular adverse events after clopidogrel treatment.CYP2C19和ABCB1基因多态性与氯吡格雷治疗后缺血性心血管不良事件的复发相关。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 Jun;32(5):e22369. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22369. Epub 2018 Feb 4.

本文引用的文献

1
CYP2C19 LOF and GOF-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.CYP2C19功能缺失和功能增强指导下的急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗血小板治疗:一项成本效益分析
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2017 Feb;31(1):39-49. doi: 10.1007/s10557-016-6705-y.
2
Dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting.冠状动脉支架置入术后的双联抗血小板治疗。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016 Sep;17(13):1775-87. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2016.1202924. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of personalized antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者个性化抗血小板治疗的成本效益分析
Pharmacogenomics. 2016 May;17(7):701-13. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2016-0008. Epub 2016 May 11.
4
Meta-Analysis of the Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Treated With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents.第二代药物洗脱支架治疗患者双联抗血小板治疗持续时间的Meta分析
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jun 1;117(11):1714-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
5
Coronary Thrombosis and Major Bleeding After PCI With Drug-Eluting Stents: Risk Scores From PARIS.经药物洗脱支架 PCI 术后的冠状动脉血栓形成和大出血:PARIS 风险评分。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 May 17;67(19):2224-2234. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.064. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
6
2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2016美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会关于冠状动脉疾病患者双联抗血小板治疗持续时间的指南聚焦更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 6;68(10):1082-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.513. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
7
Development and Validation of a Prediction Rule for Benefit and Harm of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Beyond 1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗1年后双联抗血小板治疗获益与风险预测规则的制定与验证
JAMA. 2016 Apr 26;315(16):1735-49. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3775.
8
CYP2C19 genotype plus platelet reactivity-guided antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients: a decision analysis.CYP2C19基因分型联合血小板反应性指导急性冠脉综合征患者抗血小板治疗的决策分析
Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2015 Dec;25(12):609-17. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000177.
9
Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Stenting: A Review of the Evidence.冠状动脉支架置入术后双联抗血小板治疗的持续时间:证据回顾。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Aug 18;66(7):832-847. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.053.
10
Oral dual antiplatelet therapy: what have we learnt from recent trials?口服双联抗血小板治疗:我们从最近的试验中学到了什么?
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 21;37(4):344-52. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv377. Epub 2015 Aug 6.