Department of Cardiology Brest University, Brest, France.
ICPS, Massy, France.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1202-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.049.
The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that 6-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is noninferior to 24-month DAPT in aspirin-sensitive patients.
The ITALIC (Is There a Life for DES After Discontinuation of Clopidogrel) trial showed that rates of bleeding and thrombotic events at 1 year were much the same with 6 versus 12 months of DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stents. In this report, 2-year follow-up is presented.
In a multicenter randomized study, patients with confirmed nonresistance to aspirin undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation were allocated to 6 or 24 months of DAPT. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, urgent target vessel revascularization, stroke, and major bleeding at 12 months post-percutaneous coronary intervention. The secondary endpoints comprised the same composite endpoint at 24 months and each individual component.
Overall, 2,031 patients from 70 centers were screened; 926 were randomized to 6-month and 924 to 24-month DAPT. Noninferiority was demonstrated for 6- versus 12-month DAPT, with an absolute risk difference of 0.11% (95% confidence interval: -1.04% to 1.26%; p = 0.0002). At 2 years, the composite endpoint was unchanged, at 3.5% for 6 months and 3.7% for 24 months (p = 0.79), and rates of myocardial infarction (1.3% vs. 1.0%; p = 0.51), stroke (0.6% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.77), and target vessel revascularization (1.0% vs. 0.3%; p = 0.09) were likewise similar. There was a trend toward higher mortality with longer DAPT (2.2% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.11). Four patients (0.4%) in the 24-month group and none in the 6-month group had major bleeding.
Two-year outcomes in the ITALIC trial confirmed the 1-year results and showed that patients receiving 6-month DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stent have similar outcomes to those receiving 24-month DAPT.
本研究旨在验证以下假设,即对于阿司匹林敏感的患者,6 个月双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)并不逊于 24 个月 DAPT。
ITALIC(停用氯吡格雷后 DES 还有生命力吗)试验表明,在接受第二代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,与 12 个月相比,6 个月和 12 个月 DAPT 的 1 年出血和血栓事件发生率大致相同。本报告介绍了 2 年随访结果。
在一项多中心随机研究中,接受药物洗脱支架植入术的阿司匹林确证无抵抗的患者被随机分为 6 个月或 24 个月 DAPT 组。主要终点为 12 个月经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后复合终点(死亡、心肌梗死、紧急靶血管血运重建、卒中和大出血)。次要终点包括 24 个月和每个单独组成部分的相同复合终点。
共有 70 个中心的 2031 例患者接受了筛选;926 例被随机分为 6 个月 DAPT 组,924 例被随机分为 24 个月 DAPT 组。与 12 个月 DAPT 相比,6 个月 DAPT 显示出非劣效性,绝对风险差异为 0.11%(95%置信区间:-1.04%至 1.26%;p=0.0002)。2 年时,复合终点无变化,6 个月时为 3.5%,24 个月时为 3.7%(p=0.79),心肌梗死发生率(1.3%比 1.0%;p=0.51)、卒中和靶血管血运重建发生率(0.6%比 0.8%;p=0.77)也相似。更长时间 DAPT 治疗的死亡率呈上升趋势(2.2%比 1.2%;p=0.11)。24 个月组中有 4 例(0.4%)患者和 6 个月组中无患者发生大出血。
ITALIC 试验的 2 年结果证实了 1 年的结果,表明接受第二代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后接受 6 个月 DAPT 的患者与接受 24 个月 DAPT 的患者具有相似的结局。