Aquin Joshua P, Roos Leslie E, Distasio Jino, Katz Laurence Y, Bourque Jimmy, Bolton James M, Bolton Shay-Lee, Wong Jacquelyne Y, Chateau Dan, Somers Julian M, Enns Murray W, Hwang Stephen W, Frankish James C, Sareen Jitender
1 Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
2 Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Can J Psychiatry. 2017 Jul;62(7):473-481. doi: 10.1177/0706743717694836. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
This study attempted to determine if Housing First (HF) decreased suicidal ideation and attempts compared to treatment as usual (TAU) amongst homeless persons with mental disorders, a population with a demonstrably high risk of suicidal behaviour.
The At Home/Chez Soi project is an unblinded, randomised control trial conducted across 5 Canadian cities (Vancouver, Winnipeg, Toronto, Montreal, Moncton) from 2009 to 2013. Homeless adults with a diagnosed major mental health disorder were recruited through community agencies and randomised to HF ( n = 1265) and TAU ( n = 990). HF participants were provided with private housing units and received case management support services. TAU participants retained access to existing community supports. Past-month suicidal ideation was measured at baseline and 6, 12, 18, and 21/24 months. A history of suicide attempts was measured at baseline and the 21/24-month follow-up.
Compared to baseline, there was an overall trend of decreased past-month suicidal ideation (estimate = -.57, SE = .05, P < 0.001), with no effect of treatment group (i.e., HF vs. TAU; estimate = -.04, SE = .06, P = 0.51). Furthermore, there was no effect of treatment status (estimate = -.10, SE = .16, P = 0.52) on prevalence of suicide attempts (HF = 11.9%, TAU = 10.5%) during the 2-year follow-up period.
This study failed to find evidence that HF is superior to TAU in reducing suicidal ideation and attempts. We suggest that HF interventions consider supplemental psychological treatments that have proven efficacy in reducing suicidal behaviour. It remains to be determined what kind of suicide prevention interventions (if any) are specifically effective in further reducing suicidal risk in a housing-first intervention.
本研究试图确定与常规治疗(TAU)相比,“先安置后治疗”(HF)模式能否降低患有精神障碍的无家可归者的自杀意念和自杀未遂情况,这一人群具有明显较高的自杀行为风险。
“在家/在自己家中”项目是一项非盲法随机对照试验,于2009年至2013年在加拿大5个城市(温哥华、温尼伯、多伦多、蒙特利尔、蒙克顿)开展。通过社区机构招募被诊断患有严重精神健康障碍的无家可归成年人,并将其随机分为HF组(n = 1265)和TAU组(n = 990)。HF组参与者被提供私人住房单元,并接受个案管理支持服务。TAU组参与者继续利用现有的社区支持。在基线以及6、12、18和21/24个月时测量过去一个月的自杀意念。在基线以及21/24个月随访时测量自杀未遂史。
与基线相比,过去一个月的自杀意念总体呈下降趋势(估计值 = -0.57,标准误 = 0.05,P < 0.001),治疗组无影响(即HF组与TAU组;估计值 = -0.04,标准误 = 0.06,P = 0.51)。此外,在2年随访期内,治疗状态对自杀未遂患病率无影响(估计值 = -0.10,标准误 = 0.16,P = 0.52)(HF组 = 11.9%,TAU组 = 10.5%)。
本研究未能找到证据表明HF模式在降低自杀意念和自杀未遂方面优于TAU模式。我们建议HF干预措施考虑采用已证明在降低自杀行为方面有效的补充心理治疗方法。在“先安置后治疗”干预中,何种自杀预防干预措施(如果有的话)能特别有效地进一步降低自杀风险仍有待确定。