Krug Kathrin Barbara, Houbois Christian, Grinstein Olga, Borggrefe Jan, Puesken Michael, Hanstein Bettina, Malter Wolfram, Maintz David, Hellmich Martin
Dept. of Diagnostical and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne Medical School, Cologne, Germany.
Breast Center and Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cologne Medical School, Cologne, Germany.
Rofo. 2017 Oct;189(10):977-989. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-112749. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
Based on radiological reports, the percentage of breast cancers visualized as incidental findings in routine CT examinations is estimated at ≤ 2 %. In view of the rising number of CT examinations and the high prevalence of breast cancer, it was the goal of the present study to verify the frequency and image morphology of false-negative senological CT findings. All first contrast-enhanced CT examinations of the chest in adult female patients carried out in 2012 were retrospectively included. A senior radiologist systematically assessed the presence of breast lesions on all CT images using the BI-RADS system. All BI-RADS ≥ 3 notations were evaluated by a second senior radiologist. A consensus was obtained in case of differing BI-RADS assessments. Reference diagnoses were elaborated based on all available clinical, radiological and pathological data. The findings of the CT reports were classified according to the BI-RADS system and were compared with the retrospective consensus findings as well as with the reference diagnoses. The range of indications comprised a broad spectrum including staging and follow-up examinations of solid tumors/lymphoma (N = 701, 59.9 %) and vascular (190, 16.2 %), inflammatory (48, 4.1 %) and pulmonologic (22, 1.9 %) issues. BI-RADS 1/2 classifications were present in 92.5 % and BI-RADS 6 classifications were assessed in 1.7 % of the 1170 included examinations. 68 patients (5.8 %) had at least one lesion retrospectively classified as BI-RADS 3 - 5. The histological potential was known in 57 of these lesions as benign (46, 3.9 %) or malignant (11, 0.9 %). 13 BI-RADS 4/5 consensus assessments (1.1 %) were false-positive. 2 of the 10 lesions classified as being malignant based on the further clinical and radiological course were not mentioned in the written CT reports (0.2 %). Both false-negative CT reports were therapeutically and prognostically irrelevant. The relative frequency of BI-RADS 3 - 5 findings was 5.8 %. It reflects the situation encountered in clinical imaging for primarily non-senologic questions and therefore differs from what would be expected in a dedicated screening program. The rates of known false-positive BI-RADS 4/5 findings in the retrospective evaluations (1.1 %) and of false-negative findings in the written CT reports (0.2 %) reflect the different diagnostic approaches of image-based senological screening and radiological examinations indicated in order to solve clinical problems not primarily concerning the breast region. Statements regarding the prevalence of clinically occult breast cancers can only be made with caution in the presented, highly selective group of patients due to the often incomplete visualization of breast tissue and the retrospective approach. · Intramammary mass and non-mass lesions needing clarification may be present in up to 5.8 % of all contrast enhanced CT-examinations of the female chest.. · Irregular forms, unscharp/spiculated margins, inhomogeneous matrices and a pronounced contrast medium enhancement point towards a malignant genesis of an intramammary mass or non-mass lesion.. · The results of the study highlight the importance of paying systematical and targeted attention on senological additional findings in CT-examinations of the chest also in other clinical settings than that of the included patients in a clinic with oncological main focus.. · Krug KB, Houbois C, Grinstein O et al. Focal Breast Lesions in Clinical CT Examinations of the Chest: A Retrospective Analysis. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017; 189: 977 - 988.
根据放射学报告,在常规CT检查中作为偶然发现的乳腺癌百分比估计≤2%。鉴于CT检查数量的增加以及乳腺癌的高患病率,本研究的目的是验证乳腺CT假阴性结果的频率和图像形态。回顾性纳入了2012年成年女性患者进行的所有首次胸部增强CT检查。一位资深放射科医生使用BI-RADS系统系统地评估了所有CT图像上乳腺病变的存在情况。所有BI-RADS≥3的标注均由另一位资深放射科医生进行评估。在BI-RADS评估存在差异的情况下达成共识。基于所有可用的临床、放射学和病理学数据制定参考诊断。CT报告的结果根据BI-RADS系统进行分类,并与回顾性共识结果以及参考诊断进行比较。检查指征范围广泛,包括实体瘤/淋巴瘤的分期和随访检查(N = 701,59.9%)以及血管(190,16.2%)、炎症(48,4.1%)和肺部(22,1.9%)问题。在纳入的1170例检查中,92.5%为BI-RADS 1/2分类,1.7%为BI-RADS 6分类。68例患者(5.8%)至少有一个病变在回顾性分析中被分类为BI-RADS 3 - 5。在这些病变中,57个病变的组织学性质已知为良性(46,3.9%)或恶性(11,0.9%)。有13个BI-RADS 4/5的共识评估(1.1%)为假阳性。在根据进一步的临床和放射学病程分类为恶性的10个病变中,有2个在CT书面报告中未提及(0.2%)。两份CT假阴性报告在治疗和预后方面均无相关性。BI-RADS 3 - 5结果的相对频率为5.8%。它反映了主要针对非乳腺问题的临床影像检查中遇到的情况,因此与专门的筛查计划中预期的情况不同。回顾性评估中已知的BI-RADS 4/5假阳性结果率(1.1%)和CT书面报告中的假阴性结果率(0.2%)反映了基于图像的乳腺筛查和为解决主要不涉及乳腺区域的临床问题而进行的放射学检查的不同诊断方法。由于乳腺组织通常显示不完整以及采用回顾性方法,在本研究中高度选择性的患者群体中,关于临床隐匿性乳腺癌患病率的陈述只能谨慎做出。· 在所有女性胸部增强CT检查中,高达5.8%的检查可能存在需要进一步明确的乳腺内肿块和非肿块病变。· 不规则形态、边缘模糊/有毛刺、基质不均匀以及明显的造影剂强化提示乳腺内肿块或非肿块病变的恶性起源。· 研究结果强调,在胸部CT检查中,除了以肿瘤学为主要重点的诊所中纳入的患者情况外,在其他临床环境下,系统且有针对性地关注乳腺相关额外发现也很重要。· Krug KB, Houbois C, Grinstein O等。胸部临床CT检查中的局灶性乳腺病变:一项回顾性分析。Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017; 189: 977 - 988。