Chan Monica, Ooi Chee Kheong, Wong Joshua, Zhong Lihua, Lye David
Department of Infectious Diseases, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore.
Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy Clinic, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 6;17(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2569-4.
Treatment of community acquired skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) is a common indication for outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) in USA, UK and Australasia, however data from Asia are lacking. OPAT is well established within the Singapore healthcare since 2002, however, systematic use of OPAT for the treatment of SSTIs remains infrequent. In this report, we describe the treatment and outcome of patients with SSTIs referred directly from Emergency Department (ED) to OPAT for continuation of intravenous (IV) antibiotics in Singapore, thus avoiding potential hospital admission.
This is a single center university hospital retrospective study of patients with SSTIs presenting to ED who were assessed to require IV antibiotics and accepted to the OPAT clinic for continuation of IV treatment. Exclusion criteria were: haemodynamic instability, uncontrolled or serious underlying co-morbidities, necessity for inpatient surgical drainage, facial cellulitis and cephalosporin allergy. Patients returned daily to the hospital’s OPAT clinic for administration of IV antibiotics and review, then switched to oral antibiotics on improvement.
From 7 February 2012 to 31 July 2015, 120 patients with SSTIs were treated in OPAT. Median age was 56 years and 63% were male. Lower limbs were affected in 91%. Diabetes was present in 20%. Sixty-seven (56%) had been treated with oral antibiotics for a median duration of 3 days prior to OPAT treatment. Common symptoms were erythema (100%), swelling (96%), pain (88%) and fever (55%). Antibiotics administered were IV cefazolin with oral probenecid (71%) or IV ceftriaxone (29%) for median 3 days then oral cloxacillin (85%) for median 7 days. Clinical improvement occurred in 90%. Twelve patients (10%) were hospitalized for worsening cellulitis, with 4 patients requiring surgical drainage of abscess. Microbiological cultures from 2 patients with drained abscess grew methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and Klebsiella pneumoniae, both of which were susceptible to cefazolin and ceftriaxone. Hospital bed days saved was 318 days.
OPAT treatment of community acquired SSTIs in a selected patient population has good outcomes in Singapore. Treatment with IV cefazolin or IV ceftriaxone was successful in the majority with low hospital readmission rate.
在美国、英国和澳大拉西亚,社区获得性皮肤和软组织感染(SSTIs)的治疗是门诊胃肠外抗生素治疗(OPAT)的常见适应证,然而亚洲的数据尚缺。自2002年起,OPAT在新加坡医疗体系中已确立,但系统性地使用OPAT治疗SSTIs仍不常见。在本报告中,我们描述了在新加坡直接从急诊科(ED)转诊至OPAT以继续静脉注射(IV)抗生素治疗的SSTIs患者的治疗情况及结局,从而避免了潜在的住院治疗。
这是一项单中心大学医院的回顾性研究,研究对象为到ED就诊的SSTIs患者,这些患者经评估需要静脉注射抗生素,并被OPAT诊所接收以继续静脉治疗。排除标准为:血流动力学不稳定、未控制或严重的基础合并症、住院手术引流的必要性、面部蜂窝织炎和头孢菌素过敏。患者每天返回医院的OPAT诊所接受静脉抗生素注射及复查,病情改善后改为口服抗生素。
2012年2月7日至2015年7月31日,120例SSTIs患者接受了OPAT治疗。中位年龄为56岁,63%为男性。91%的患者下肢受累。20%的患者患有糖尿病。67例(56%)在接受OPAT治疗前曾接受口服抗生素治疗,中位疗程为3天。常见症状为红斑(100%)、肿胀(96%)、疼痛(88%)和发热(55%)。使用的抗生素为静脉注射头孢唑林加口服丙磺舒(71%)或静脉注射头孢曲松(29%),中位疗程为3天,然后口服氯唑西林(85%),中位疗程为7天。90%的患者临床症状改善。12例患者(10%)因蜂窝织炎恶化而住院,4例患者需要手术引流脓肿。2例脓肿引流患者的微生物培养结果显示为甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)和肺炎克雷伯菌,二者均对头孢唑林和头孢曲松敏感。节省的住院天数为318天。
在新加坡,对选定患者群体采用OPAT治疗社区获得性SSTIs取得了良好的效果。静脉注射头孢唑林或头孢曲松治疗多数患者成功,住院再入院率低。