• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用大剂量口服头孢氨苄对儿童中度蜂窝织炎进行门诊治疗

Outpatient management of moderate cellulitis in children using high-dose oral cephalexin.

作者信息

Trottier Evelyne D, Farley St-Amand Beatrice, Vincent Mélanie, Chevalier Isabelle, Autmizguine Julie, Tremblay Stéphanie, Gouin Serge

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Department of Paediatrics, Université de Montréal, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Paediatr Child Health. 2022 May 3;27(4):213-219. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxac031. eCollection 2022 Jul.

DOI:10.1093/pch/pxac031
PMID:35859686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9291389/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of a high-dose (HD) oral cephalexin treatment guideline for children with moderate cellulitis treated as outpatients.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we included children who presented to the emergency department (ED) with moderate cellulitis and treated according to the institution's HD oral cephalexin guideline over a 2-year period. All children had standardized follow-up at a medical day hospital (MDH). Treatment was considered effective in the absence of treatment failure, defined as admission, switch to IV treatment or ED visit within 2 weeks of discharge from the MDH. Safety was ascertained by recording adverse events and severe complications at follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 123 children were treated as outlined in the guideline, including 117 treated with HD oral cephalexin. The success rate was 89.7% (105/117). Among 12 (10.3%) children who had treatment failure, 10 (8.5%) required admission, 1 (0.9%) received IV antibiotics at the MDH and 1 (0.9%) had a return visit to the ED without admission. No severe complications were reported; four abscesses required drainage and one patient had a rash. The mean number of visits per child at the MDH was 1.6 (SD 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

With a success rate of 89.7%, HD oral cephalexin seems effective and safe for the treatment of children with moderate cellulitis. Its use potentially reduces hospitalization rates for this condition and decreases the need for IV insertion.

摘要

目的

评估高剂量(HD)口服头孢氨苄治疗指南对门诊治疗的中度蜂窝织炎儿童的有效性。

方法

在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们纳入了在两年期间因中度蜂窝织炎到急诊科就诊并按照机构的HD口服头孢氨苄指南进行治疗的儿童。所有儿童均在医疗日间医院(MDH)接受标准化随访。若未出现治疗失败,即未在MDH出院后2周内入院、改用静脉治疗或到急诊科就诊,则认为治疗有效。通过记录随访时的不良事件和严重并发症来确定安全性。

结果

共有1​​23名儿童按照指南进行了治疗,其中117名接受了HD口服头孢氨苄治疗。成功率为89.7%(105/117)。在12名(10.3%)治疗失败的儿童中,10名(8.5%)需要入院,1名(0.9%)在MDH接受了静脉抗生素治疗,1名(0.9%)返回急诊科但未入院。未报告严重并发症;4例脓肿需要引流,1例患者出现皮疹。每个儿童在MDH的平均就诊次数为1.6次(标准差1.0)。

结论

HD口服头孢氨苄治疗中度蜂窝织炎儿童的成功率为89.7%,似乎有效且安全。使用该药可能会降低这种疾病的住院率,并减少静脉穿刺的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f898/9291389/486c230e7b54/pxac031_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f898/9291389/486c230e7b54/pxac031_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f898/9291389/486c230e7b54/pxac031_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Outpatient management of moderate cellulitis in children using high-dose oral cephalexin.使用大剂量口服头孢氨苄对儿童中度蜂窝织炎进行门诊治疗
Paediatr Child Health. 2022 May 3;27(4):213-219. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxac031. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
High-dose cephalexin for cellulitis: a pilot randomized controlled trial.高剂量头孢氨苄治疗蜂窝织炎的前瞻性随机对照研究
CJEM. 2023 Jan;25(1):22-30. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00433-7. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
3
Pediatric cellulitis: success of emergency department short-course intravenous antibiotics.小儿蜂窝织炎:急诊科短期静脉用抗生素治疗的成效
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Mar;26(3):171-6. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181d1de08.
4
Management of cellulitis in a pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊科蜂窝织炎的管理
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Nov;23(11):805-11. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31815a032f.
5
Treatment of urinary tract infections among febrile young children with daily intravenous antibiotic therapy at a day treatment center.在日间治疗中心对发热幼儿的尿路感染采用每日静脉注射抗生素疗法进行治疗。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e469-76. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0421.
6
Predictors of failure of empiric outpatient antibiotic therapy in emergency department patients with uncomplicated cellulitis.急诊门诊单纯性蜂窝织炎患者经验性门诊抗生素治疗失败的预测因素。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 May;21(5):526-31. doi: 10.1111/acem.12371.
7
Empiric outpatient therapy with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, cephalexin, or clindamycin for cellulitis.经验性门诊治疗蜂窝织炎,可选择使用复方磺胺甲噁唑、头孢氨苄或克林霉素。
Am J Med. 2010 Oct;123(10):942-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.05.020.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Evaluation of cephalexin failure rates in morbidly obese patients with cellulitis.对患有蜂窝织炎的病态肥胖患者中头孢氨苄失败率的评估。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Aug;41(4):409-13. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12402. Epub 2016 May 19.
10
Use of a telehealth follow-up system to facilitate treatment and discharge of emergency department patients with severe cellulitis.利用远程医疗随访系统为急诊科严重蜂窝织炎患者提供治疗和出院便利。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;41:184-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.01.061. Epub 2020 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of first- and second-line antibiotics for cellulitis and erysipelas: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.一线和二线抗生素治疗蜂窝织炎和丹毒的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Sep 6;316(8):603. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03317-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Managing pain and distress in children undergoing brief diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.在接受简短诊断和治疗程序的儿童中管理疼痛和痛苦。
Paediatr Child Health. 2019 Dec;24(8):509-535. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxz026. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
2
Cellulitis: oral versus intravenous and home versus hospital-what makes clinicians decide?蜂窝织炎:口服治疗与静脉治疗以及家庭治疗与住院治疗——临床医生如何做出决策?
Arch Dis Child. 2020 Apr;105(4):413-415. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-316824. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
3
Efficacy and safety of intravenous ceftriaxone at home versus intravenous flucloxacillin in hospital for children with cellulitis (CHOICE): a single-centre, open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.
静脉注射头孢曲松在家中与静脉注射氟氯西林在医院治疗蜂窝织炎儿童的疗效和安全性(CHOICE):一项单中心、开放标签、随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 May;19(5):477-486. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30729-1. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
4
Development and Validation of a Cellulitis Risk Score: The Melbourne ASSET Score.开发和验证一种蜂窝织炎风险评分:墨尔本 ASSET 评分。
Pediatrics. 2019 Feb;143(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-1420. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
5
Limitations of ceftriaxone compared with cefazolin against MSSA: an integrated pharmacodynamic analysis.头孢曲松与头孢唑林比较治疗 MSSA 的局限性:一项综合药效学分析。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Jul 1;73(7):1888-1894. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky120.
6
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy and Judicious Use of Pediatric Emergency Resources.门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗与儿科急诊资源的合理使用。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 May;36(5):e247-e253. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001215.
7
Role of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy in the treatment of community acquired skin and soft tissue infections in Singapore.门诊胃肠外抗生素治疗在新加坡社区获得性皮肤及软组织感染治疗中的作用
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 6;17(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2569-4.
8
Effect of Cephalexin Plus Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole vs Cephalexin Alone on Clinical Cure of Uncomplicated Cellulitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.头孢氨苄联合甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑与单用头孢氨苄治疗单纯性蜂窝织炎临床疗效的对比:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 May 23;317(20):2088-2096. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.5653.
9
Managing Pediatric Pain in the Emergency Department.急诊科小儿疼痛的管理
Paediatr Drugs. 2016 Aug;18(4):287-301. doi: 10.1007/s40272-016-0181-5.
10
Cost Analysis of the STONE Randomized Trial: Can Health Care Costs be Reduced One Test at a Time?STONE随机试验的成本分析:医疗保健成本能否一次通过一项检测得以降低?
Med Care. 2016 Apr;54(4):337-42. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000487.