Department of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University Vienna, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 6;7(1):4742. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04751-0.
Exploration (interacting with objects to gain information) and neophobia (avoiding novelty) are considered independent traits shaped by the socio-ecology of a given species. However, in the literature it is often assumed that neophobia inhibits exploration. Here, we investigate how different approaches to novelty (fast or slow) determine the time at which exploration is likely to occur across a number of species. We presented four corvid and five parrot species with a touchscreen discrimination task in which novel stimuli were occasionally interspersed within the familiar training stimuli. We investigated the likelihood that an animal would choose novelty at different stages of its training and found evidence for a shift in the pattern of exploration, depending on neotic style. The findings suggest that faster approaching individuals explored earlier, whilst animals with long initial approach latencies showed similar amounts of exploration but did so later in training. Age rather than species might have influenced the amount of total exploration, with juveniles exploring more than adults. Neotic style varied consistently only for one species and seems to involve a strong individual component, rather than being a purely species-specific trait. This suggests that variation in behavioural phenotypes within a species may be adaptive.
探索(通过与物体交互获取信息)和新奇抑制(避免新奇事物)被认为是由特定物种的社会生态塑造的独立特征。然而,在文献中,人们通常假设新奇抑制会抑制探索。在这里,我们研究了不同的新奇应对方式(快速或缓慢)如何决定了在多个物种中探索发生的时间。我们在触摸屏辨别任务中向四种鸦科鸟类和五种鹦鹉类展示了新颖的刺激,偶尔会在熟悉的训练刺激中穿插新的刺激。我们调查了动物在训练的不同阶段选择新奇事物的可能性,并发现了依赖于新奇风格的探索模式变化的证据。研究结果表明,更快接近的个体更早地进行探索,而初始接近潜伏期较长的动物表现出相似的探索量,但在训练后期才进行探索。年龄而不是物种可能会影响总探索量,幼体比成年体探索更多。只有一种物种的新奇风格始终变化,似乎涉及到强烈的个体成分,而不仅仅是一种纯粹的物种特异性特征。这表明,同一物种内行为表型的变化可能是适应性的。