Schneck H J, von Hundelshausen B, Tempel G, Brosch R
Aktuelle Traumatol. 1985 Dec;15(6):249-53.
The injury severity score (ISS) has been most widely accepted as a practicable method of classifying traumatised patients (ie., patients with accident injuries) according to the severity of their injuries, and has become more popular than all other comparable classification systems. By allocating the patients to different severity groups, it facilitates their classification in respect of prognosis. Over and above this, it enables comparison of patient groups of different hospitals. The authors investigated the validity of ISS classification by studying the case records of 432 patients in a traumatological intensive-care ward. They found good correlation between ISS score on the one hand, and lethality, requirements of banked blood during first-aid care and duration of treatment and artificial respiration of survivors on the other. However, the mean survival time of those patients who had died, did not reveal any connection with the severity of the injury. It is definitely impossible to arrive at any prognosis for an individual patient on the basis of his ISS classification. With increasing age, lethality after an accident increases even if the injury is less severe. The validity of ISS could be increased further if the age of the patients could be taken into account as well.
损伤严重程度评分(ISS)作为一种根据创伤患者(即事故受伤患者)损伤严重程度进行分类的可行方法,已被广泛接受,并且比所有其他类似分类系统更受欢迎。通过将患者分配到不同的严重程度组,有助于对其预后进行分类。除此之外,它还能对不同医院的患者群体进行比较。作者通过研究创伤重症监护病房中432例患者的病例记录,调查了ISS分类的有效性。他们发现,一方面ISS评分与致死率、急救期间库存血的需求量以及幸存者的治疗时间和人工呼吸时间之间存在良好的相关性。然而,死亡患者的平均生存时间与损伤严重程度并无关联。绝对不可能根据患者的ISS分类对个体患者做出任何预后判断。随着年龄的增长,即使损伤不太严重,事故后的致死率也会增加。如果也能考虑患者的年龄,ISS的有效性可能会进一步提高。