Chang Feng-Hang, Chang Kwang-Hwa, Liou Tsan-Hon, Whiteneck Gale G
Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Dec;98(12):2498-2506. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.05.027. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
To examine the construct validity of the Participation Measure-3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D), a multidimensional participation measure developed for use in rehabilitation practice.
Cross-sectional study.
Outpatient rehabilitation programs.
Rehabilitation patients (N=556; mean age, 61.4±23.6y; 47.1% women).
Not applicable.
The PM-3D4D is a 19-item measure designed to evaluate participation in 3 domains-Productivity, Social, and Community-across 4 dimensions-Diversity, Frequency, Desire for change, and Difficulty. Intercorrelations among the 4 dimensions of the PM-3D4D and correlations between the PM-3D4D and 3 legacy instruments-Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective, Participation Measure for Post-Acute Care, and Satisfaction With Life Scale-were examined to establish the convergent and divergent validity of the PM-3D4D. Known-group validity was evaluated by comparing PM-3D4D scores across age groups and groups of people classified by functional level.
The Diversity scale of the PM-3D4D was strongly correlated with the Frequency scale (Spearman correlation coefficient, r=.83-.96 across the 3 domains), and these 2 scales showed moderate to strong correlations with the Difficulty scale (r=.42-.70) but weak (r=-.4 to 0) and insignificant correlations with the Desire for change scale. The Frequency and Difficulty scales of the PM-3D4D showed moderate to strong correlations with the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective and Participation Measure for Post-Acute Care (r=.41-.82), respectively, and the Desire for change scale had weak correlations with the Satisfaction With Life Scale (r=-.32 to -.18). Significant differences in PM-3D4D scores were found by age and functional level.
Findings of this study support the construct validity of the PM-3D4D, providing evidence for using the PM-3D4D to assess rehabilitation patients' participation performance and helping practitioners identify intervention priorities to improve patients' participation outcomes.
检验参与度测量-3领域、4维度量表(PM-3D4D)的结构效度,这是一种为康复实践开发的多维参与度测量工具。
横断面研究。
门诊康复项目。
康复患者(N=556;平均年龄61.4±23.6岁;47.1%为女性)。
不适用。
PM-3D4D是一个包含19个条目的量表,旨在评估在3个领域(生产力、社交和社区)中4个维度(多样性、频率、改变意愿和难度)的参与情况。检验了PM-3D4D的4个维度之间的相互关联,以及PM-3D4D与3种传统工具(重组工具客观参与度评估、急性后期护理参与度测量和生活满意度量表)之间的相关性,以确立PM-3D4D的收敛效度和区分效度。通过比较不同年龄组和按功能水平分类的人群的PM-3D4D得分来评估已知组效度。
PM-3D4D的多样性量表与频率量表高度相关(斯皮尔曼相关系数,在3个领域中r=.83-.96),这两个量表与难度量表呈中度至高度相关(r=.42-.70),但与改变意愿量表的相关性较弱(r=-.4至0)且无显著相关性。PM-3D4D的频率和难度量表分别与重组工具客观参与度评估和急性后期护理参与度测量呈中度至高度相关(r=.41-.82),改变意愿量表与生活满意度量表的相关性较弱(r=-.32至-.18)。按年龄和功能水平发现PM-3D4D得分存在显著差异。
本研究结果支持PM-3D4D的结构效度,为使用PM-3D4D评估康复患者的参与表现提供了证据,并帮助从业者确定干预重点以改善患者的参与结果。