Insalaco Louis, Rashes Emma R, Rubin Samuel J, Spiegel Jeffrey H
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Buckingham Browne & Nichols School, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Dec 1;19(6):510-515. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2017.0463.
The lateral crural overlay technique is a powerful technique for altering nasal tip projection and rotation. By overlapping and thus shortening the lateral crura, the nasal tip is shortened and rotated upward, thus decreasing projection and increasing rotation. There is no data to show the association of this technique with the strength of the lower lateral cartilage. Strengthening of the lower lateral cartilages would presumably lead to resistance to external nasal valve collapse and improved airway.
In this cadaver study, we set out to determine the differences in the strength and resilience of the lateral crura after performing lateral crural overlay using 2 different techniques.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Seven individual lower lateral cartilages were harvested from 6 cadavers for analysis. Each of the 7 cartilages was included sequentially in 3 test groups in the following order: a preprocedure group (preP), a postprocedure group (postP) in which the lateral crural overlay technique was performed, and a postprocedure with glue group (postPG) in which cyanoacrylate glue was added to the postP cartilages to simulate cartilage healing. A force gauge was used to measure the force required to deflect the lower lateral cartilages distances from 1 to 6 mm.
Differences measured in newtons (N) for strength and resilience of lateral crura between the preP, postP, and postPG groups.
A statistically significant increase in lower lateral cartilage resilience was noted between the preP and postPG groups at all distances of tip deflection (1 mm, 0.20 vs 0.70 N; P < .001; 2 mm, 0.26 vs 1.13 N; P < .001; 3 mm, 0.31 vs 1.53 N; P < .001; 4 mm, 0.41 vs 2.05 N; P < .001; 5 mm, 0.68 vs 2.60 N; P < .001; 6 mm, 1.49 vs 3.26 N; P = .03). There was a statistically significant difference between the postP and postPG groups in the amount of force required to deflect the cartilages 1 to 5 mm (1 mm, 0.24 vs 0.70 N; P < .001; 2 mm, 0.34 vs 1.13 N; P < .001; 3 mm, 0.51 vs 1.53 N; P < .001; 4 mm, 0.77 vs 2.05 N; P < .001; 5 mm, 1.32 vs 2.60 N; P = .01), but not 6 mm (2.33 vs 3.26 N; P = .31).
The lateral crural overlay technique affords increased strength and resilience to the lateral crura of the lower lateral cartilages, which should in turn decrease the likelihood of external nasal valve collapse postoperatively.
NA.
外侧脚覆盖技术是一种改变鼻尖突出度和旋转度的有效技术。通过重叠从而缩短外侧脚,鼻尖得以缩短并向上旋转,进而降低突出度并增加旋转度。尚无数据表明该技术与下外侧软骨强度之间的关联。增强下外侧软骨可能会抵抗鼻外阀塌陷并改善气道。
在这项尸体研究中,我们着手确定使用两种不同技术进行外侧脚覆盖后外侧脚在强度和弹性方面的差异。
设计、设置和参与者:从6具尸体上获取7个单独的下外侧软骨用于分析。7个软骨中的每一个依次纳入以下3个测试组:术前组(preP)、实施外侧脚覆盖技术的术后组(postP)以及在postP软骨上添加氰基丙烯酸酯胶水以模拟软骨愈合的术后胶水组(postPG)。使用测力计测量使下外侧软骨偏移1至6毫米所需的力。
preP、postP和postPG组之间外侧脚强度和弹性以牛顿(N)为单位测量的差异。
在所有鼻尖偏移距离下(1毫米,0.20对0.70 N;P <.001;2毫米,0.26对1.13 N;P <.001;3毫米,0.31对1.53 N;P <.001;4毫米,0.41对2.05 N;P <.001;5毫米,0.68对2.60 N;P <.001;6毫米,1.49对3.26 N;P = 0.03),preP组和postPG组之间下外侧软骨弹性有统计学显著增加。在使软骨偏移1至5毫米所需的力方面,postP组和postPG组之间存在统计学显著差异(1毫米,0.24对0.70 N;P <.001;2毫米,0.34对1.13 N;P <.001;3毫米,0.51对1.53 N;P <.001;4毫米,0.77对2.05 N;P <.001;5毫米,1.32对2.60 N;P = 0.01),但6毫米时无差异(2.33对3.26 N;P = 0.31)。
外侧脚覆盖技术可增强下外侧软骨外侧脚的强度和弹性,这反过来应会降低术后鼻外阀塌陷的可能性。
无。