Department of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK.
Genneruxi Medical Center, Center for Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Aug;56:55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
People with a diagnosis of schizophrenia have significant social and functional difficulties. Social cognition was found to influences these outcomes and in recent years interventions targeting this domain were developed. This paper reviews the existing literature on social cognition interventions for people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia focussing on: i) comparing focussed (i.e. targeting only one social cognitive domain) and global interventions and ii) studies methodological quality.
Systematic search was conducted on PubMed and PsycInfo. Studies were included if they were randomised control trials, participants had a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, and the intervention targeted at least one out of four social cognition domains (i.e. theory of mind, affect recognition, social perception and attribution bias). All papers were assessed for methodological quality. Information on the intervention, control condition, study methodology and the main findings from each study were extracted and critically summarised.
Data from 32 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, considering a total of 1440 participants. Taking part in social cognition interventions produced significant improvements in theory of mind and affect recognition compared to both passive and active control conditions. Results were less clear for social perception and attributional bias. Focussed and global interventions had similar results on outcomes. Overall study methodological quality was modest. There was very limited evidence showing that social cognitive intervention result in functional outcome improvement.
The evidence considered suggests that social cognition interventions may be a valuable approach for people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. However, evidence quality is limited by measure heterogeneity, modest study methodology and short follow-up periods. The findings point to a number of recommendations for future research, including measurement standardisation, appropriately powered studies and investigation of the impact of social cognition improvements on functioning problems.
被诊断为精神分裂症的患者存在明显的社交和功能障碍。社会认知被发现会影响这些结果,近年来,针对这一领域的干预措施也已开发出来。本文综述了针对精神分裂症患者的社会认知干预的现有文献,重点关注:i)比较针对性(即仅针对一个社会认知领域)和全面性干预,以及 ii)研究方法学质量。
在 PubMed 和 PsycInfo 上进行了系统搜索。如果研究是随机对照试验,参与者被诊断为精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍,并且干预至少针对四个社会认知领域中的一个(即心理理论、情感识别、社会知觉和归因偏见),则将其纳入研究。所有论文都评估了方法学质量。提取并批判性总结了干预措施、对照组、研究方法和每项研究的主要发现的信息。
共 32 项研究的数据符合纳入标准,共纳入了 1440 名参与者。与被动和主动对照组相比,参与社会认知干预可显著改善心理理论和情感识别。社会知觉和归因偏见的结果则不太明确。针对性和全面性干预在结果上相似。总体研究方法学质量中等。几乎没有证据表明社会认知干预会导致功能结果的改善。
考虑到的证据表明,社会认知干预可能是精神分裂症患者的一种有价值的方法。然而,证据质量受到测量异质性、适度的研究方法和短期随访期的限制。研究结果提出了一些未来研究的建议,包括测量标准化、适当功率的研究以及调查社会认知改善对功能问题的影响。