Suppr超能文献

与传统耳镜检查相比,由医疗服务人员收集的全科医生使用视频耳镜检查的诊断准确性。

Diagnostic accuracy of a general practitioner with video-otoscopy collected by a health care facilitator compared to traditional otoscopy.

作者信息

Lundberg Thorbjörn, Biagio de Jager Leigh, Swanepoel De Wet, Laurent Claude

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Family Medicine, Umea University, S-901 87 Umea, Sweden.

Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Aug;99:49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.04.045. Epub 2017 May 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Video-otoscopy is rapidly developing as a new method to diagnose common ear disease and can be performed by trained health care facilitators as well as by clinicians. This study aimed to compare remote asynchronous assessments of video-otoscopy with otoscopy performed by a general practitioner.

METHOD

Children, aged 2-16 years, attending a health center in Johannesburg, South Africa, were examined. An otologist performed otomicroscopy and a general practitioner performed otoscopy. Video-otoscopy was performed by a health care facilitator and video sequences were stored on a server for assessment by the same general practitioner 4 and 8 weeks later. At all examinations, a diagnosis was set and the tympanic membrane appearance was graded using the OMgrade-scale. The otologist's otomicroscopic diagnosis was set as reference standard to compare the accuracy of the two otoscopic methods.

RESULTS

Diagnostic agreement between otologist's otomicroscopic examination and the general practitioner's otoscopic examination was substantial (kappa 0.66). Agreement between onsite otomicroscopy and the general practitioners asynchronous video assessments were also substantial (kappa 0.70 and 0.80).

CONCLUSION

Video-otoscopy performed by a health care facilitator and assessed asynchronously by a general practitioner had similar or better accuracy compared to face-to-face otoscopy performed by a general practitioner.

摘要

目的

视频耳镜检查正迅速发展成为诊断常见耳部疾病的一种新方法,经过培训的医疗保健人员以及临床医生均可进行此项检查。本研究旨在比较视频耳镜检查的远程异步评估与全科医生进行的耳镜检查。

方法

对在南非约翰内斯堡一家健康中心就诊的2至16岁儿童进行检查。一名耳科医生进行耳显微镜检查,一名全科医生进行耳镜检查。由一名医疗保健人员进行视频耳镜检查,并将视频序列存储在服务器上,以供同一名全科医生在4周和8周后进行评估。在所有检查中,做出诊断,并使用OMgrade量表对鼓膜外观进行分级。将耳科医生的耳显微镜诊断作为参考标准,以比较两种耳镜检查方法的准确性。

结果

耳科医生的耳显微镜检查与全科医生的耳镜检查之间的诊断一致性较高(kappa值为0.66)。现场耳显微镜检查与全科医生的异步视频评估之间的一致性也较高(kappa值分别为0.70和0.80)。

结论

由医疗保健人员进行视频耳镜检查并由全科医生进行异步评估,与全科医生进行的面对面耳镜检查相比,具有相似或更高的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验