Department of Family Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Center for Health and Community, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Nov;53(5):719-729. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
Healthcare systems are experimenting increasingly with interventions to address patients' social and economic needs. This systematic review examines how often and how rigorously interventions bridging social and medical care have been evaluated.
The review included literature from PubMed published between January 2000 and February 2017. Additional studies were identified by reference searches and consulting local experts. Included studies were based in the U.S.; addressed at least one social or economic determinant of health (e.g., housing, employment, food insecurity); and were integrated within the medical care delivery system. Data from included studies were abstracted in June 2015 (studies published January 2000-December 2014) and in March 2017 (studies published January 2015-February 2017).
Screening of 4,995 articles identified 67 studies of 37 programs addressing social needs. Interventions targeted a broad range of social needs and populations. Forty studies involved non-experimental designs. There was wide heterogeneity in outcome measures selected. More studies reported findings associated with process (69%) or social or economic determinants of health (48%) outcomes than health (30%) or healthcare utilization or cost (27%) outcomes. Studies reporting health, utilization, or cost outcomes reported mixed results.
Healthcare systems increasingly incorporate programs to address patients' social and economic needs in the context of care. But evaluations of these programs to date focus primarily on process and social outcomes and are often limited by poor study quality. Higher-quality studies that include common health and healthcare utilization outcomes would advance effectiveness research in this rapidly expanding field.
医疗保健系统越来越多地尝试通过干预措施来满足患者的社会和经济需求。本系统评价考察了衔接社会和医疗保健的干预措施的评估频率和严格程度。
综述纳入了 2000 年 1 月至 2017 年 2 月期间在 PubMed 上发表的文献。通过参考文献检索和咨询当地专家,进一步确定了其他研究。纳入的研究均基于美国;至少涉及一个健康的社会或经济决定因素(如住房、就业、粮食不安全);并整合在医疗保健提供系统内。2015 年 6 月(2000 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月发表的研究)和 2017 年 3 月(2015 年 1 月至 2017 年 2 月发表的研究)提取纳入研究的数据。
对 4995 篇文章进行筛选后,确定了 67 项针对社会需求的 37 项计划的研究。干预措施针对广泛的社会需求和人群。40 项研究采用非实验设计。所选择的结果衡量标准差异很大。更多的研究报告了与过程(69%)或健康的社会或经济决定因素(48%)结果相关的发现,而不是健康(30%)或医疗保健利用或成本(27%)结果。报告健康、利用或成本结果的研究报告结果喜忧参半。
医疗保健系统越来越多地在医疗保健背景下纳入满足患者社会和经济需求的计划。但是,迄今为止对这些计划的评估主要集中在过程和社会结果上,并且往往受到研究质量差的限制。纳入常见健康和医疗保健利用结果的高质量研究将推动这一快速发展领域的有效性研究。