• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节和膝关节置换术后遗留抗生素药盒:高并发症发生率。

Retained Antibiotic Spacers After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Resections: High Complication Rates.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3510-3518. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.053. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.053
PMID:28690039
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prolonged retention of an antibiotic spacer is occasionally chosen during treatment of periprosthetic joint infections after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the outcome of extended spacer retention.

METHODS

We reviewed 1106 cases of periprosthetic joint infection after THA (n = 308) and TKA (n = 798) and identified 17 (5.5%) retained hip and 34 (4.3%) retained knee spacers. Most patients (35 of 51, 69%) underwent spacer retention because they were medically unfit for further surgery. The remaining patients (16 of 51, 31%) had acceptable function and forewent further surgery. Competing risk analyses, with death as the competing risk, determined the cumulative incidence of reinfection and spacer revision. Radiographic analysis and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The 2-year cumulative incidence for reinfection was 7% for retained hip and 13% for retained knee spacers. The cumulative incidence for all-cause spacer revision was 28% at 4 years for hips and 21% at 2 years for knees. The most common complications were implant migration and femoral spacer subsidence in the hip cohort, and supracondylar femur fractures and spacer dislocations in the knee cohort. The cumulative incidence for radiographic signs of mechanical failure was 72% and 87% at late follow-up for the hip and knee groups, respectively. The latest Harris Hip Score and Knee Society Score were 62 and 63, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic spacer retention is a rare event in the course of planned 2-stage treatment of infected THA or TKA. Failure secondary to recurrent infection is uncommon; however, failure for mechanical reasons is frequent and clinical outcomes are relatively poor.

摘要

背景

在全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)后治疗假体周围关节感染时,偶尔会选择延长抗生素间隔器的保留时间。我们研究的目的是评估延长间隔器保留时间的结果。

方法

我们回顾了 1106 例 THA(n=308)和 TKA(n=798)后假体周围关节感染的病例,确定了 17 例髋关节(5.5%)和 34 例膝关节(4.3%)保留的间隔器。大多数患者(51 例中的 35 例,69%)因身体状况不适合进一步手术而保留间隔器。其余患者(51 例中的 16 例,31%)功能可接受,因此未进行进一步手术。以死亡为竞争风险,进行竞争风险分析,以确定再感染和间隔器翻修的累积发生率。分析影像学分析和临床结果。

结果

保留髋关节的 2 年再感染累积发生率为 7%,保留膝关节的为 13%。4 年时髋关节的全因间隔器翻修累积发生率为 28%,2 年时膝关节的为 21%。最常见的并发症是髋关节组中的植入物迁移和股骨间隔器下沉,以及膝关节组中的股骨髁上骨折和间隔器脱位。髋关节组的影像学机械失败迹象的累积发生率为 72%,膝关节组为 87%。最新的 Harris 髋关节评分和膝关节协会评分分别为 62 和 63。

结论

在计划的 2 期治疗感染性 THA 或 TKA 的过程中,抗生素间隔器保留是一种罕见的情况。继发于再感染的失败并不常见;然而,由于机械原因导致的失败很常见,临床结果相对较差。

相似文献

1
Retained Antibiotic Spacers After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Resections: High Complication Rates.髋关节和膝关节置换术后遗留抗生素药盒:高并发症发生率。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3510-3518. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.053. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
2
Two-Stage Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Specific Articulating Antibiotic Spacer Design: Reliable Periprosthetic Joint Infection Eradication and Functional Improvement.两阶段翻修全髋关节置换术结合特定活动型抗生素间隔物设计:可靠的假体周围关节感染清除和功能改善。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3746-3753. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
3
The Influence of Spacer Design on the Rate of Complications in Two-Stage Revision Hip Arthroplasty.间隔物设计对两阶段翻修髋关节置换术并发症发生率的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1201-1206. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
4
[ANTIBIOTIC-IMPREGNATED ARTICULAR CEMENT SPACER FOR TREATMENT OF PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION].用于治疗人工关节周围感染的抗生素骨水泥间隔物
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Apr;29(4):420-5.
5
Outcomes of Articulating Spacers With Autoclaved Femoral Components in Total Knee Arthroplasty Infection.在全膝关节置换感染中使用经高压灭菌股骨部件的可连接间隔物的结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Aug;33(8):2595-2604. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.059. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
6
Short-term Follow-up of Antibiotic-loaded Articulating Cement Spacers in Two-stage Revision of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Series.感染性全膝关节置换二期翻修中抗生素骨水泥关节连接型间隔物的短期随访:病例系列研究
Orthop Surg. 2018 May;10(2):128-133. doi: 10.1111/os.12381. Epub 2018 May 17.
7
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Implants as Functional Prosthetic Spacers for Definitive Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Multicenter Study.初次全膝关节置换假体作为治疗人工关节周围感染的功能性假体间隔物:一项多中心研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Dec;34(12):3040-3047. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
8
Long-Term Results of a 2-Stage Exchange Protocol for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in 164 Hips.164 髋人工全髋关节置换术后二期翻修治疗假体周围关节感染的长期疗效。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jan 2;101(1):74-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01103.
9
High Rate of Positive Cultures in Patients Referred With Antibiotic Spacers as Part of 2-Stage Exchange.两阶段关节置换术中使用抗生素 spacer 的患者中,阳性培养率较高。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7):2230-2233. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.059. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
10
Two-stage revision of prosthetic hip joint infections using antibiotic-loaded cement spacers: When is the best time to perform the second stage?使用含抗生素骨水泥间隔物对人工髋关节感染进行两阶段翻修:第二阶段手术的最佳时机是什么时候?
Int Orthop. 2015 Sep;39(9):1731-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2751-5. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel post-cam endoskeleton-reinforced posterior-stabilized cement articulating spacer reduced the rate of mechanical complications in prosthetic knee infection.新型后交叉韧带内骨骼增强型后稳定型骨水泥关节连接间隔物降低了人工膝关节感染的机械并发症发生率。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 May 23;20(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05938-2.
2
Infection control rate in two-stage exchange for chronic periprosthetic joint infection: a retrospective cohort study focusing on antibiotic-free period.慢性人工关节周围感染两阶段翻修术的感染控制率:一项聚焦于无抗生素期的回顾性队列研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 14;25(1):523. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10919-1.
3
Cemented Constrained Liners Used as an Articulating Hip Spacer for the Treatment of Chronic Prosthetic Joint Infection.
用于治疗慢性人工关节感染的骨水泥固定受限衬垫作为髋关节活动间隔物
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Aug 10;29:101422. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101422. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Polyurethane: An Old Material for a New Generation of Antibiotic Spacer Implants.聚氨酯:用于新一代抗生素间隔植入物的一种旧材料。
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Aug 9;29:101409. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101409. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Mouldable Collagen-Tricalciumphosphate Is a Safe Carrier for Local Antibiotics-Short-Term Results in Revision Hip Arthroplasty.可塑形胶原-磷酸三钙是局部抗生素的安全载体——髋关节翻修术的短期结果
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 May 30;13(6):510. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13060510.
6
The Use of a Novel On-bone Femoral Spacer Molding Device for Reducing Femoral Spacer Complications in Periprosthetic Total Knee Infection: Preliminary Results.一种新型股骨骨上间隔物成型装置在减少人工关节周围全膝关节感染中股骨间隔物并发症方面的应用:初步结果
Arthroplast Today. 2024 May 9;27:101400. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101400. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Concomitant Cement Spacer and Peri-spacer Fractures Seven Years After First-stage Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Report.初次翻修膝关节置换术后七年出现的骨水泥间隔物及间隔物周围骨折:一例报告
J Orthop Case Rep. 2024 Apr;14(4):78-83. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i04.4366.
8
Evaluation of time to reimplantation as a risk factor in two-stage revision with static spacers for periprosthetic knee joint infection.评价二期翻修中使用静态间隔器治疗人工膝关节假体周围感染时再植入的时间作为一个危险因素。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Mar 25;25(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00745-7.
9
Aseptic survival of the 1.5-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection was acceptable when using an autoclaved femoral component and a new polyethylene insert.当使用经高压灭菌的股骨部件和新的聚乙烯内衬时,用于假体周围关节感染的1.5期翻修关节成形术的无菌生存率是可以接受的。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Nov;31(11):4996-5004. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07552-3. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
10
Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature.二期翻修治疗假体周围感染时,长时间再植入是否是再感染的危险因素?一项文献系统综述。
Front Surg. 2023 Feb 17;10:1113006. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1113006. eCollection 2023.