Pallesen Ståle, Nielsen Morten B, Magerøy Nils, Andreassen Cecilie S, Einarsen Ståle
Department of Psychosocial Science, University of BergenBergen, Norway.
National Institute of Occupational HealthOslo, Norway.
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 22;8:1045. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01045. eCollection 2017.
Previous studies on the personality of bullies and targets have exclusively been based on self-report. Against this backdrop we conducted a between group experimental vignette study with three conditions, describing a bully, a target and a control, respectively. Students ( = 242) were recruited as participants and rated the target on the observer rating version of the NEO Five Factor Inventory-Revised reflecting the personality dimensions Neuroticism, Extroversion, Openness to experience, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. A MANOVA showed an overall significant effect of the experimental conditions. On Neuroticism significant differences between all conditions were found with targets rated highest and the control lowest. In terms of Extroversion the target was rated as lower than the control and the bully. No main effect was found for Openness. On Agreeableness the bully was rated as lower than both the target and the control. The bully was rated lower on Conscientiousness than the control. The significant differences reflected medium to large effect sizes. By and large the results are in agreement with comparable self-report data. The results are discussed in terms of practical implications and directions for future research are outlined.
以往关于霸凌者和受霸凌者性格的研究完全基于自我报告。在此背景下,我们进行了一项组间实验性 vignette 研究,设置了三种情境,分别描述一名霸凌者、一名受霸凌者和一个对照组。招募了242名学生作为参与者,并让他们根据 NEO 五因素问卷修订版的观察者评分版本对受霸凌者进行评分,该版本反映了神经质、外向性、经验开放性、宜人性和尽责性这几个性格维度。一项多变量方差分析显示实验情境具有总体显著效应。在神经质方面,所有情境之间存在显著差异,受霸凌者得分最高,对照组得分最低。在外向性方面,受霸凌者的得分低于对照组和霸凌者。经验开放性未发现主效应。在宜人性方面,霸凌者的得分低于受霸凌者和对照组。霸凌者在尽责性方面的得分低于对照组。这些显著差异反映出中等至较大的效应量。总体而言,研究结果与类似的自我报告数据一致。我们从实际意义的角度对研究结果进行了讨论,并概述了未来研究的方向。