• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

员工教育以及规范给药和采集时间对病房患者万古霉素谷浓度适宜性的影响。

Effects of staff education and standardizing dosing and collection times on vancomycin trough appropriateness in ward patients.

作者信息

Hammond Drayton A, Atkinson Lexis N, James Taylor B, Painter Jacob T, Lusardi Katherine

机构信息

PharmD, MBA, BCPS, BCCCP. Assistant Professor. Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; & Department of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Medical Center. Little Rock, AR (United States).

Pharmacy Resident. Department of Pharmacy, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System. Little Rock, AR (United States).

出版信息

Pharm Pract (Granada). 2017 Apr-Jun;15(2):949. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2017.02.949. Epub 2017 Jun 30.

DOI:10.18549/PharmPract.2017.02.949
PMID:28690700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5499355/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many institutions have guidelines for initiation and monitoring, but not timing, of vancomycin.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate vancomycin trough collection appropriateness before and after an initiative to change the dosing and trough collection times in ward patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of ward patients from May 2014-16 who received scheduled intravenous vancomycin was performed. Nurse managers and pharmacists provided staff education. Differences between pre- and post-intervention groups were compared using student's t-test for continuous data and chi-square test for categorical data.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between the pre-intervention (n=124) and post-intervention (n=122) groups except for weight-based maintenance dose (15.3 mg/kg vs. 16.5 mg/kg, p=0.03) and percentage of troughs collected with morning labs (14% vs. 87%, p<0.001). Patients in the pre- and post-intervention groups received a similar frequency of loading doses (14.5% vs. 16%, p=0.68). There was no significant difference in percentage of vancomycin troughs collected appropriately at 30 (40% vs. 42%, p=0.72), 60 (57% vs. 63%, p=0.35), or 75 (60% vs. 68%, p=0.22) minutes from the scheduled time of the next dose.

CONCLUSION

Staff education and standardizing collection of vancomycin troughs with morning blood collections did not affect the percentage of appropriately collected vancomycin troughs.

摘要

背景

许多机构都有关于万古霉素起始用药及监测的指南,但未提及用药时间。

目的

我们的目的是评估在一项改变病房患者万古霉素给药剂量和谷浓度采集时间的倡议前后,万古霉素谷浓度采集的适宜性。

方法

对2014年5月至2016年接受定期静脉注射万古霉素的病房患者进行回顾性队列研究。护士经理和药剂师对工作人员进行了培训。采用学生t检验比较干预前后连续数据组间差异,采用卡方检验比较分类数据组间差异。

结果

干预前(n = 124)和干预后(n = 122)组的基线特征相似,但基于体重的维持剂量(15.3 mg/kg对16.5 mg/kg,p = 0.03)以及早晨采集血样时采集谷浓度的百分比(14%对87%,p < 0.001)除外。干预前和干预后组患者接受负荷剂量的频率相似(14.5%对16%,p = 0.68)。在距下次给药预定时间30分钟(40%对42%,p = 0.72)、60分钟(57%对63%,p = 0.35)或75分钟(60%对68%,p = 0.22)时,适宜采集万古霉素谷浓度的百分比无显著差异。

结论

工作人员培训以及将万古霉素谷浓度采集与早晨采血标准化并未影响适宜采集万古霉素谷浓度的百分比。

相似文献

1
Effects of staff education and standardizing dosing and collection times on vancomycin trough appropriateness in ward patients.员工教育以及规范给药和采集时间对病房患者万古霉素谷浓度适宜性的影响。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2017 Apr-Jun;15(2):949. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2017.02.949. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
2
Changing the Time of Blood Collection to Determine Vancomycin Concentrations in Intensive Care Unit Patients.改变采血时间以测定重症监护病房患者的万古霉素浓度
Crit Care Nurse. 2018 Feb;38(1):24-28. doi: 10.4037/ccn2018594.
3
[Research of optimal dosing regimens and therapeutic drug monitoring for vancomycin by clinical pharmacists: analysis of 7-year data].临床药师对万古霉素最佳给药方案及治疗药物监测的研究:7年数据分析
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Jul;30(7):640-645. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.07.005.
4
Impact of Nursing Education on the Proportion of Appropriately Drawn Vancomycin Trough Concentrations.护理教育对万古霉素谷浓度合理抽取比例的影响。
J Pharm Pract. 2016 Oct;29(5):472-4. doi: 10.1177/0897190014568381. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
5
Short term impact of guidelines on vancomycin dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring.指南对万古霉素剂量和治疗药物监测的短期影响。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2012 Apr;34(2):282-5. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9614-6. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
6
Evaluation of an Empiric Vancomycin Dosing Protocol on Goal Troughs and Acute Kidney Injury in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.评估新生儿重症监护病房经验性万古霉素给药方案对目标谷浓度和急性肾损伤的影响
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2023;28(4):335-342. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-28.4.335. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
7
The Impact of Pediatric-Specific Vancomycin Dosing Guidelines: A Quality Improvement Initiative.儿科专用万古霉素给药指南的影响:一项质量改进举措。
Pediatrics. 2017 Jun;139(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2423. Epub 2017 May 11.
8
Vancomycin dosing in critically ill trauma patients: The VANCTIC Study.严重创伤患者万古霉素的剂量:VANCTIC 研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Nov;87(5):1164-1171. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002492.
9
Achieving Vancomycin Troughs Within Goal Range in Low Birth Weight Neonates.使低出生体重新生儿的万古霉素谷浓度达到目标范围。
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2021;26(1):56-61. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-26.1.56. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
10
Improving vancomycin prescription in critical illness through a drug use evaluation process: a weight-based dosing intervention study.通过药物使用评估流程改善危重症患者万古霉素处方:一项基于体重的给药干预研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012 Jan;39(1):69-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.08.017. Epub 2011 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Experience of Vancomycin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Two Multidisciplinary Hospitals in Latvia.在拉脱维亚的两家多学科医院中万古霉素治疗药物监测的经验。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 2;58(3):370. doi: 10.3390/medicina58030370.
2
Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on Vancomycin Usage: Costs and Outcomes at Hospital for Tropical Diseases in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.抗菌药物管理计划对万古霉素使用的影响:越南胡志明市热带病医院的成本与结果
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jun 22;14:2637-2646. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S307744. eCollection 2021.
3
Interventions targeting the prescribing and monitoring of vancomycin for hospitalized patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.针对住院患者万古霉素处方和监测的干预措施:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Infect Drug Resist. 2018 Oct 31;11:2081-2094. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S176519. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients on Concomitant Vancomycin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam Compared to Those on Vancomycin and Cefepime.万古霉素与哌拉西林他唑巴坦联合治疗与万古霉素与头孢吡肟联合治疗相比患者发生急性肾损伤的风险。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jan 15;64(2):116-123. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw709. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
2
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Acute Kidney Injury Associated with Concomitant Vancomycin and Piperacillin/tazobactam.万古霉素与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦联用所致急性肾损伤的系统评价与Meta分析
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 1;64(5):666-674. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw811. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
3
Management of Adults With Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: 2016 Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society.成人医院获得性肺炎和呼吸机相关性肺炎的管理:美国感染病学会和美国胸科学会2016年临床实践指南
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 1;63(5):e61-e111. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw353. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
4
Comparative Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Vancomycin with Concomitant Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Cefepime: A Retrospective Cohort Study.接受万古霉素联合哌拉西林 - 他唑巴坦或头孢吡肟的重症患者急性肾损伤的比较发病率:一项回顾性队列研究
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 May;36(5):463-71. doi: 10.1002/phar.1738. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
5
Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on Patient Safety in Veterans Prescribed Vancomycin.抗菌药物管理计划对接受万古霉素治疗的退伍军人患者安全的影响。
Clin Ther. 2016 Mar;38(3):494-502. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
6
Top Guns: The "Maverick" and "Goose" of Empiric Therapy.王牌:经验性治疗中的“独行侠”与“呆头鹅”
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Feb;17(1):38-47. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.104. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
7
Risk factors for kidney injury during vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam administration, including increased odds of injury with combination therapy.万古霉素和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦给药期间发生肾损伤的危险因素,包括联合治疗导致肾损伤几率增加。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Oct 17;8:579. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1518-9.
8
Nephrotoxicity comparison of two commercially available generic vancomycin products.两种市售通用型万古霉素产品的肾毒性比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Sep;59(9):5470-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00388-15. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
9
Association of vancomycin serum concentrations with efficacy in patients with MRSA infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.万古霉素血清浓度与耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染患者疗效的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015 Jul;21(7):665-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
10
Impact of Nursing Education on the Proportion of Appropriately Drawn Vancomycin Trough Concentrations.护理教育对万古霉素谷浓度合理抽取比例的影响。
J Pharm Pract. 2016 Oct;29(5):472-4. doi: 10.1177/0897190014568381. Epub 2015 Jan 22.