Rijal Dilli P, Alm Torbjørn, Nilsen Lennart, Alsos Inger G
Department of Natural Sciences Tromsø Museum UiT-The Arctic University of Norway Tromsø Norway.
Department of Arctic and Marine Biology UiT-The Arctic University of Norway Tromsø Norway.
Ecol Evol. 2017 May 30;7(13):4936-4950. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3055. eCollection 2017 Jul.
The impact of invasion on diversity varies widely and remains elusive. Despite the considerable attempts to understand mechanisms of biological invasion, it is largely unknown whether some communities' characteristics promote biological invasion, or whether some inherent characteristics of invaders enable them to invade other communities. Our aims were to assess the impact of one of the massive plant invaders of Scandinavia on vascular plant species diversity, disentangle attributes of invasible and noninvasible communities, and evaluate the relationship between invasibility and genetic diversity of a dominant invader. We studied 56 pairs of Desf. ex Fisch.-invaded and noninvaded plots from 12 locations in northern Norway. There was lower native cover, evenness, taxonomic diversity, native biomass, and species richness in the invaded plots than in the noninvaded plots. The invaded plots had nearly two native species fewer than the noninvaded plots on average. Within the invaded plots, cover of had a strong negative effect on the native cover, evenness, and native biomass, and a positive association with the height of the native plants. Plant communities containing only native species appeared more invasible than those that included exotic species, particularly . Genetic diversity of was positively correlated with invasibility but not with community diversity. The invasion of a plant community by exerts consistent negative pressure on vascular plant diversity. The lack of positive correlation between impacts and genetic diversity of indicates that even a small founder population may cause high impact. We highlight community stability or saturation as an important determinant of invasibility. While the invasion by may decrease susceptibility of a plant community to further invasion, it severely reduces the abundance of native species and makes them more vulnerable to competitive exclusion.
入侵对多样性的影响差异很大,且仍难以捉摸。尽管人们为理解生物入侵机制付出了巨大努力,但对于某些群落特征是否促进生物入侵,或者入侵者的某些固有特征是否使其能够入侵其他群落,在很大程度上仍不清楚。我们的目的是评估斯堪的纳维亚半岛大量植物入侵者之一对维管植物物种多样性的影响,理清可入侵和不可入侵群落的属性,并评估优势入侵者的可入侵性与遗传多样性之间的关系。我们研究了挪威北部12个地点的56对被Desf. ex Fisch.入侵和未入侵的样地。与未入侵样地相比,入侵样地的本地植被覆盖度、均匀度、分类多样性、本地生物量和物种丰富度较低。入侵样地平均比未入侵样地少近两种本地物种。在入侵样地内,Desf. ex Fisch.的覆盖度对本地植被覆盖度、均匀度和本地生物量有强烈的负面影响,与本地植物高度呈正相关。仅包含本地物种的植物群落似乎比包含外来物种(特别是Desf. ex Fisch.)的群落更易被入侵。Desf. ex Fisch.的遗传多样性与可入侵性呈正相关,但与群落多样性无关。Desf. ex Fisch.对植物群落的入侵对维管植物多样性施加了持续的负面压力。Desf. ex Fisch.的影响与遗传多样性之间缺乏正相关表明,即使是一个小的奠基种群也可能造成很大影响。我们强调群落稳定性或饱和度是可入侵性的一个重要决定因素。虽然Desf. ex Fisch.的入侵可能会降低植物群落对进一步入侵的易感性,但它会严重减少本地物种的丰度,使其更容易受到竞争排斥。