Krop Ian, Ismaila Nofisat, Andre Fabrice, Bast Robert C, Barlow William, Collyar Deborah E, Hammond M Elizabeth, Kuderer Nicole M, Liu Minetta C, Mennel Robert G, Van Poznak Catherine, Wolff Antonio C, Stearns Vered
Ian Krop, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Fabrice Andre, Institute Gustave Roussy, Paris, France; Robert C. Bast, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Robert G. Mennel, Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology PA, Dallas, TX; William Barlow, Cancer Research and Biostatistics, Seattle, WA; Deborah E. Collyar, Patient Advocates in Research, Danville, CA; M. Elizabeth Hammond, University of Utah and Intermountain Health Care, Salt Lake City, UT; Nicole M. Kuderer, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA; Minetta C. Liu, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; Catherine Van Poznak, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Antonio C. Wolff and Vered Stearns, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 20;35(24):2838-2847. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.0472. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
Purpose This focused update addresses the use of MammaPrint (Agendia, Irvine, CA) to guide decisions on the use of adjuvant systemic therapy. Methods ASCO uses a signals approach to facilitate guideline updates. For this focused update, the publication of the phase III randomized MINDACT (Microarray in Node-Negative and 1 to 3 Positive Lymph Node Disease May Avoid Chemotherapy) study to evaluate the MammaPrint assay in 6,693 women with early-stage breast cancer provided a signal. An expert panel reviewed the results of the MINDACT study along with other published literature on the MammaPrint assay to assess for evidence of clinical utility. Recommendations If a patient has hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, node-negative breast cancer, the MammaPrint assay may be used in those with high clinical risk to inform decisions on withholding adjuvant systemic chemotherapy due to its ability to identify a good-prognosis population with potentially limited chemotherapy benefit. Women in the low clinical risk category did not benefit from chemotherapy regardless of genomic MammaPrint risk group. Therefore, the MammaPrint assay does not have clinical utility in such patients. If a patient has hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive breast cancer, the MammaPrint assay may be used in patients with one to three positive nodes and a high clinical risk to inform decisions on withholding adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. However, such patients should be informed that a benefit from chemotherapy cannot be excluded, particularly in patients with greater than one involved lymph node. The clinician should not use the MammaPrint assay to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive breast cancer at low clinical risk, nor any patient with HER2-positive or triple-negative breast cancer, because of the lack of definitive data in these populations. Additional information can be found at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .
目的 本重点更新内容涉及MammaPrint(Agendia公司,加利福尼亚州欧文市)在辅助性全身治疗使用决策中的应用。方法 美国临床肿瘤学会采用信号法来促进指南更新。对于本次重点更新,一项评估MammaPrint检测法在6693例早期乳腺癌女性患者中应用的Ⅲ期随机MINDACT(淋巴结阴性及1至3个阳性淋巴结疾病的微阵列检测可能避免化疗)研究的发表提供了一个信号。一个专家小组审查了MINDACT研究的结果以及其他关于MammaPrint检测法的已发表文献,以评估其临床实用性的证据。建议 如果患者患有激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性、淋巴结阴性的乳腺癌,MammaPrint检测法可用于具有高临床风险的患者,以指导关于因能够识别出化疗获益可能有限的预后良好人群而停用辅助性全身化疗的决策。低临床风险类别的女性无论基因组MammaPrint风险组如何,均未从化疗中获益。因此,MammaPrint检测法对此类患者不具有临床实用性。如果患者患有激素受体阳性、HER2阴性、淋巴结阳性的乳腺癌,MammaPrint检测法可用于有1至3个阳性淋巴结且临床风险高的患者,以指导关于停用辅助性全身化疗的决策。然而,应告知此类患者不能排除化疗的获益,特别是在有一个以上受累淋巴结的患者中。临床医生不应使用MammaPrint检测法来指导激素受体阳性、HER2阴性、临床风险低的淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者以及任何HER2阳性或三阴性乳腺癌患者的辅助性全身治疗决策,因为这些人群缺乏确凿数据。更多信息可在www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines和www.asco.org/guidelineswiki上找到。