Serinolli Mario Ivo, Novaretti Marcia Cristina Zago
Health Administration Graduate Department, Universidade Nove de Julho, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 10;12(7):e0180009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180009. eCollection 2017.
Various sociodemographic factors can affect the quality of life of medical students and interfere in their ability to study. A deeper understanding of these factors may facilitate improvements in learning and retention of medical students.
We conducted a cross-sectional study of 405 medical students, representing 65.3% of the total student body (years 1-6), at a private medical school in São Paulo, Brazil. Among the entire study group, 177 students (43.7%) were male, and 228 (56.3%) were female. The mean age was 23.55 years (SD = 3.98 years, range: 18-40). The World Health Organization Quality of Life-Biomedical Research and Education Facility (WHOQOL-BREF) scale was used to evaluate the following sociodemographic factors: age, sex, academic year, daily traveling time, housing conditions, smoking, weight, height, participant's and his/her parents' education background, students who had a degree or not and religious beliefs. The reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF was evaluated using Cronbach's analysis, and the association of sociodemographic factors with quality of life was examined using multivariate regression analysis.
Quality of life was significantly higher in medical students with religious beliefs (β 0.14 for psychological domain; β 0.11 for environmental domain) when compared with that in those with no religious beliefs. BMI was negative associated with QOL in medical students (β -0.11 for physical domain; β -18.9 for the psychological domain). In both male and female students, longer daily traveling time was negative related to QOL (β -0.11 for environmental domain). Having at least one parent who was a doctor was associated with a better quality of life (β 0.17 for environmental domain). Male students presented with significantly higher mean scores for three of the four domains evaluated (β 0.20 for physical domain; β 0.25 for psychological domain; β 0.14 for social domain).
This study has provided novel insights into the effects of sociodemographic factors, physical traits, and religious beliefs on the quality of life of medical students. These findings may facilitate improvements in physical, psychological, and social support for medical students at a critical stage in their training, thereby providing tools for student better adjustment to medical school.
各种社会人口学因素会影响医学生的生活质量,并干扰他们的学习能力。深入了解这些因素可能有助于提高医学生的学习效果和知识保留率。
我们对巴西圣保罗一所私立医学院的405名医学生进行了横断面研究,这些学生占学生总数(1 - 6年级)的65.3%。在整个研究组中,177名学生(43.7%)为男性,228名(56.3%)为女性。平均年龄为23.55岁(标准差 = 3.98岁,范围:18 - 40岁)。使用世界卫生组织生活质量-生物医学研究与教育机构(WHOQOL-BREF)量表来评估以下社会人口学因素:年龄、性别、学年、每日出行时间、住房条件、吸烟情况、体重、身高、参与者及其父母的教育背景、是否拥有学位以及宗教信仰。使用克朗巴哈分析评估WHOQOL-BREF的信度,并使用多元回归分析检验社会人口学因素与生活质量的关联。
与无宗教信仰的医学生相比,有宗教信仰的医学生生活质量显著更高(心理领域β为0.14;环境领域β为0.11)。体重指数与医学生的生活质量呈负相关(身体领域β为 - 0.11;心理领域β为 - 18.9)。在男女生中,每日出行时间越长与生活质量呈负相关(环境领域β为 - 0.11)。至少有一位父母是医生与更好的生活质量相关(环境领域β为0.17)。在评估的四个领域中的三个领域,男生的平均得分显著更高(身体领域β为0.20;心理领域β为0.25;社会领域β为0.14)。
本研究为社会人口学因素、身体特征和宗教信仰对医学生生活质量的影响提供了新的见解。这些发现可能有助于在医学生培训的关键阶段改善对他们的身体、心理和社会支持,从而为学生更好地适应医学院提供工具。