Kato Shin, Chinen Kenji, Shinoura Susumu, Kikuchi Kaoru
Department of Gastroenterology, Okinawa Prefectural Chubu Hospital, Uruma, Okinawa, Japan.
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 10;12(7):e0180536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180536. eCollection 2017.
Predictors for bile duct stone recurrence after endoscopic stone extraction have not yet been clearly defined and a study investigating naïve major duodenal papilla is warranted because studies focusing only on naïve major duodenal papilla are rare. The aim of this study was to observe the long-term outcomes of endoscopic bile duct stone extraction for naïve major duodenal papilla and to assess the predictors for recurrence.
This was a retrospective cohort study that consisted of 384 patients with naïve papilla who underwent initial endoscopic bile duct stone extraction. Patients were followed up in outpatient department subsequent to complete stone clearance. Recurrence was defined as symptomatic repeated stone formation observed at least three months after the procedure. Stone recurrence, predictors of recurrence, and the recurrence rate, depending on each endoscopic treatment for major duodenal papilla, were examined.
In this study, 34 patients (8.9%) developed stone recurrence. The median time to recurrence was 439 days. Periampullary diverticulum and multiple stones were strong predictors of bile duct stone recurrence (RR, 5.065; 95% CI, 2.435-10.539 and RR: 2.4401; 95% CI: 1.0946-5.4396, respectively). The above two factors were independent predictors of stone recurrence as per logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders (Periampullary diverticulum: OR, 7.768; 95% CI, 3.27-18.471; multiple stones: OR, 4.144; 95% CI, 1.33-12.915). No recurrence was observed after endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation (0/20), whereas recurrence was observed in 7 patients after endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (7/45) and in 27 patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy (27/319). However, these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.105).
We determined that the presence of periampullary diverticulum and multiple stones are strong predictors for recurrence after endoscopic stone extraction. Moreover, endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation tended to be correlated with non-recurrence of bile duct stone.
内镜下取石术后胆管结石复发的预测因素尚未明确界定,鉴于仅关注单纯十二指肠乳头的研究较少,因此有必要开展一项针对单纯十二指肠乳头的研究。本研究的目的是观察单纯十二指肠乳头内镜下胆管取石的长期疗效,并评估复发的预测因素。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了384例接受初次内镜下胆管取石的单纯乳头患者。结石完全清除后,患者在门诊接受随访。复发定义为术后至少三个月出现有症状的反复结石形成。根据对十二指肠乳头的每种内镜治疗方法,研究结石复发情况、复发的预测因素及复发率。
本研究中,34例患者(8.9%)出现结石复发。复发的中位时间为439天。壶腹周围憩室和多发结石是胆管结石复发的有力预测因素(相对危险度分别为5.065;95%可信区间为2.435 - 10.539和相对危险度:2.4401;95%可信区间:1.0946 - 5.4396)。经针对混杂因素进行逻辑回归分析后,上述两个因素是结石复发的独立预测因素(壶腹周围憩室:比值比,7.768;95%可信区间为3.27 - 18.471;多发结石:比值比,4.144;95%可信区间为1.33 - 12.915)。内镜下乳头大球囊扩张术后未观察到复发(0/20),而内镜下乳头球囊扩张术后有7例复发(7/45),内镜下括约肌切开术后有27例复发(27/319)。然而,这些差异无统计学意义(p = 0.105)。
我们确定壶腹周围憩室和多发结石的存在是内镜下取石术后复发的有力预测因素。此外,内镜下乳头大球囊扩张术往往与胆管结石不复发相关。