Suppr超能文献

内镜下乳头大球囊扩张术用于既往内镜括约肌切开术后复发性难取胆管结石的处理

Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for the management of recurrent difficult bile duct stones after previous endoscopic sphincterotomy.

作者信息

Yoon Hyung Geun, Moon Jong Ho, Choi Hyun Jong, Kim Dong Choon, Kang Myung Soo, Lee Tae Hoon, Cha Sang-Woo, Cho Young Deok, Park Sang-Heum, Kim Sun-Joo

机构信息

Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Soon Chun Hyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon and Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Dig Endosc. 2014 Mar;26(2):259-63. doi: 10.1111/den.12102. Epub 2013 Apr 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic management of recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is effective and safe. However, repeat EST for extension of a previous EST for recurrent bile duct stones may involve substantial risk. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) without repeat EST for recurrent difficult bile duct stones after previous EST.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2006 to October 2010, a total of 52 patients were enrolled; all had undergone EPLBD (balloon diameter: 12-20 mm) to remove recurrent difficult bile duct stones after previous EST. In all patients, stone removal had failed with conventional methods using a basket and/or balloon. The size of the balloon for EPLBD was selected to fit the diameter of the common bile duct or the largest stone.

RESULTS

The median interval between initial EST and stone recurrence was 2.2 years (range 1-10). Median diameters of thelargest stone and balloon were 20.1 mm (range 12-40) and 14.7 mm (range 12-20), respectively. Complete stone removal was achieved in all patients (100%). The median number of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography sessions needed for complete stone removal was 1.6 (range 1-3). Additional lithotripsy was required in 16 patients (30.7%). No procedure-related complications were documented, with the exception of four cases of asymptomatic hyperamylasemia. The recurrence rate of CBD stones after bile duct clearance was 17.3% (9/52) during the follow-up period (mean 27.0 ± 14.1 months).

CONCLUSIONS

EPLBD without repeat EST is effective and relatively safe for the extraction of recurrent difficult bile duct stones after previous EST.

摘要

背景

内镜括约肌切开术(EST)后复发性胆管结石的内镜治疗是有效且安全的。然而,为复发性胆管结石而重复进行EST以扩大先前的EST范围可能存在较大风险。本研究的目的是评估在先前EST后,不重复进行EST的内镜乳头大球囊扩张术(EPLBD)治疗复发性难取性胆管结石的安全性和有效性。

患者与方法

2006年1月至2010年10月,共纳入52例患者;所有患者均接受了EPLBD(球囊直径:12 - 20毫米)以清除先前EST后复发性难取性胆管结石。所有患者使用网篮和/或球囊的传统方法取石均失败。EPLBD球囊的大小根据胆总管直径或最大结石直径选择。

结果

初次EST与结石复发的中位间隔时间为2.2年(范围1 - 10年)。最大结石和球囊的中位直径分别为20.1毫米(范围12 - 40毫米)和14.7毫米(范围12 - 20毫米)。所有患者(100%)结石完全清除。完全清除结石所需的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的中位次数为1.6次(范围1 - 3次)。16例患者(30.7%)需要额外的碎石术。除4例无症状高淀粉酶血症外,未记录到与手术相关的并发症。随访期间(平均27.0 ± 14.1个月),胆管结石清除后胆总管结石的复发率为17.3%(9/52)。

结论

不重复进行EST的EPLBD对于先前EST后复发性难取性胆管结石的取出是有效且相对安全的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验