Ives Natalie J, Suciu Stefan, Eggermont Alexander M M, Kirkwood John, Lorigan Paul, Markovic Svetomir N, Garbe Claus, Wheatley Keith
Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Public Health Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
EORTC Headquarters, Avenue Emmanuel Mounier 83/11, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Sep;82:171-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
Many randomised trials assessing interferon-α (IFN-α) as adjuvant therapy for high-risk malignant melanoma have been undertaken. To better assess the role of IFN-α, an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of these trials was undertaken.
IPD was sought from all randomised trials of adjuvant IFN-α versus no IFN-α for high-risk melanoma. Primary outcomes were event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Standard methods for quantitative IPD meta-analysis were used. Subgroup analyses by dose, duration of treatment and various patient and disease-specific parameters were performed.
Fifteen trials were included in the analysis (eleven with IPD). EFS was significantly improved with IFN-α (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86, CI 0.81-0.91; P < 0.00001), as was OS (HR = 0.90, CI 0.85-0.97; P = 0.003). The absolute differences in EFS at 5 and 10 years were 3.5% and 2.7%, and for OS were 3.0% and 2.8% respectively in favour of IFN-α. There was no evidence that the benefit of IFN-α differed depending on dose or duration of treatment, or by age, gender, site of primary tumour, disease stage, Breslow thickness, or presence of clinical nodes. Only for ulceration was there evidence of an interaction (test for heterogeneity: P = 0.04 for EFS; P = 0.002 for OS); only patients with ulcerated tumours appeared to obtain benefit from IFN-α.
This meta-analysis provides clear evidence that adjuvant IFN-α significantly reduces the risk of relapse and improves survival and shows no benefit for higher doses compared to lower doses. The increased benefit in patients with ulcerated tumours, and lack of benefit in patients without ulceration, needs further investigation.
已经开展了许多评估干扰素-α(IFN-α)作为高危恶性黑色素瘤辅助治疗的随机试验。为了更好地评估IFN-α的作用,对这些试验进行了个体患者数据(IPD)荟萃分析。
从所有比较辅助性IFN-α与不使用IFN-α治疗高危黑色素瘤的随机试验中获取IPD。主要结局为无事件生存期(EFS)和总生存期(OS)。采用定量IPD荟萃分析的标准方法。按剂量、治疗持续时间以及各种患者和疾病特异性参数进行亚组分析。
15项试验纳入分析(11项有IPD)。IFN-α显著改善了EFS(风险比[HR]=0.86,95%置信区间[CI]0.81-0.91;P<0.00001),OS也得到改善(HR=0.90,CI 0.85-0.97;P=0.003)。5年和10年时EFS的绝对差异分别为3.5%和2.7%,OS的绝对差异分别为3.0%和2.8%,均有利于IFN-α。没有证据表明IFN-α的益处因剂量、治疗持续时间或年龄、性别、原发肿瘤部位、疾病分期、Breslow厚度或临床淋巴结情况而异。仅在溃疡方面存在相互作用的证据(异质性检验:EFS的P=0.04;OS的P=0.002);只有肿瘤溃疡患者似乎从IFN-α中获益。
这项荟萃分析提供了明确证据,即辅助性IFN-α显著降低复发风险并改善生存期,且与低剂量相比,高剂量并无更多益处。肿瘤溃疡患者获益增加而无溃疡患者未获益这一情况需要进一步研究。